(1)The generation of millennials are changing our world in many different ways, either for better or worse. They are commonly viewed as self-preserved, selfish, incoherent, narcissistic, and spoiled. Older generations fear that because the millennial’s political views are much different from democrats and republicans, that it may cause a revolution and therefore both older and future generations will suffer. Ron Fournier argues that millennials will destroy Washington’s current state of affairs, and Jack and David Cahn help support this claim in a similar perspective. Both Fournier and Cahn and Cahn use several types of development strategies, purpose strategies, appeals and various other techniques to persuade their audience to believe that Millennials are indeed in charge of the future, and their actions will cost us. This Cahn “manifesto” extends Fournier’s logical conclusion about revolutionary, or worse, millennial political goals.
(2)As an individual, every person has …show more content…
Jack and David both claim that their “thesis is that these pragmatic, resilient, and optimistic young people will use their votes to wage a silent war against the Washington elite” (¶ 16). If they all collaborate, they can create a silent war against the Washington elite. You need a powerful group for this to occur, and there is no doubt that millennials are willing to do so. The audience that they are aiming for is similar to that of Fournier’s, a college-educated reader with basic knowledge of politics and its policies. Cahn and Cahn’s tone throughout the introduction is solemn, informative and urgent, which keeps the reader interested and more open-minded. Unlike Fournier, Cahn and Cahn is much more straightforward and informative, which creates a powerful argument and persuades the reader in an effective
(2)As an individual, every person has …show more content…
Jack and David both claim that their “thesis is that these pragmatic, resilient, and optimistic young people will use their votes to wage a silent war against the Washington elite” (¶ 16). If they all collaborate, they can create a silent war against the Washington elite. You need a powerful group for this to occur, and there is no doubt that millennials are willing to do so. The audience that they are aiming for is similar to that of Fournier’s, a college-educated reader with basic knowledge of politics and its policies. Cahn and Cahn’s tone throughout the introduction is solemn, informative and urgent, which keeps the reader interested and more open-minded. Unlike Fournier, Cahn and Cahn is much more straightforward and informative, which creates a powerful argument and persuades the reader in an effective