For example, the First Amendment considered: the right to freedom of speech, press, and religion. Equally important in the White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders struck back at ESPN host Jemele Hill for referring to President Trump as a “white supremacist,” calling the comment “outrageous” and saying she should lose her job does it make sense to have someone lose their job because they wanted to share their open like the first amendment stated or is it the fact that it's the “President” that the whole first amendment is abolish. Henceforth, the 8th Amendment Forbids exorbitant bails and fines and ( punishment that is unusual or cruel). Focusing mostly on the punishment I feel this goes with the topic of freedom too because will our citizens feel that our brutal policemen are free from this law because sometimes police officers have had impossible events occurred around them leaving them in a tiger mouth yet they always find a way to escape before the tiger close his mouth without a tiny scratch on them. Is it okay to say just because they escaped the consequences that they're free or is the law working around them not against them because they're apart of the law. Briefly, freedom is what you consider it or what you fight for because you know how you should be treated as to be considered
For example, the First Amendment considered: the right to freedom of speech, press, and religion. Equally important in the White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders struck back at ESPN host Jemele Hill for referring to President Trump as a “white supremacist,” calling the comment “outrageous” and saying she should lose her job does it make sense to have someone lose their job because they wanted to share their open like the first amendment stated or is it the fact that it's the “President” that the whole first amendment is abolish. Henceforth, the 8th Amendment Forbids exorbitant bails and fines and ( punishment that is unusual or cruel). Focusing mostly on the punishment I feel this goes with the topic of freedom too because will our citizens feel that our brutal policemen are free from this law because sometimes police officers have had impossible events occurred around them leaving them in a tiger mouth yet they always find a way to escape before the tiger close his mouth without a tiny scratch on them. Is it okay to say just because they escaped the consequences that they're free or is the law working around them not against them because they're apart of the law. Briefly, freedom is what you consider it or what you fight for because you know how you should be treated as to be considered