Bloom frames his defense of ethnocentrism by stating that it should be the one actual take away of analyzing other cultures because “only in Western nations… is there some willingness to doubt the identification of the good with one’s own way” (Bloom, 36). This serves as a cornerstone for a critic of the modern university’s “western prejudice” that forces cultural history on students in such away that they learn nothing from other cultures and nothing of their own superiority. Remarkably, one of the key arguments Bloom makes in his tear down of academic historicism is built off of an ignorance seemingly born out of a strict adherence to the classical canon. To say that western cultures are the only ones to question their innate good is false. It would have been easy to correct if Bloom examined any number of non-western cultures, but paradoxically, the only thing he would have learned from his examination is apparently a blind reinforcement of his own
Bloom frames his defense of ethnocentrism by stating that it should be the one actual take away of analyzing other cultures because “only in Western nations… is there some willingness to doubt the identification of the good with one’s own way” (Bloom, 36). This serves as a cornerstone for a critic of the modern university’s “western prejudice” that forces cultural history on students in such away that they learn nothing from other cultures and nothing of their own superiority. Remarkably, one of the key arguments Bloom makes in his tear down of academic historicism is built off of an ignorance seemingly born out of a strict adherence to the classical canon. To say that western cultures are the only ones to question their innate good is false. It would have been easy to correct if Bloom examined any number of non-western cultures, but paradoxically, the only thing he would have learned from his examination is apparently a blind reinforcement of his own