David Luban proposes that “These doctrines originate from a moral understanding of violent conflict. The danger exists, however, that when the concepts of the theory are adopted into the usage of politics and diplomacy their moral content is replaced by definitions which are merely convenient.” Here, Luban places the blame directly on the politicians who bend the ideas of just war to fit their personal agenda. To further the just war doctrine, propaganda was put out further glorifying war, turning it into “a festive competition, more like a game than a gravely serious matter” (World History 463). This thinking persuaded more men to enlist in the military, just like Paul, and subsequently give up their lives in a war that would never benefit them, only those in power. Propaganda, misinformation, and manipulation were all tactics used by governments to persuade men to fight in the war, and Paul grew aware of this throughout the novel, All Quiet on the Western
David Luban proposes that “These doctrines originate from a moral understanding of violent conflict. The danger exists, however, that when the concepts of the theory are adopted into the usage of politics and diplomacy their moral content is replaced by definitions which are merely convenient.” Here, Luban places the blame directly on the politicians who bend the ideas of just war to fit their personal agenda. To further the just war doctrine, propaganda was put out further glorifying war, turning it into “a festive competition, more like a game than a gravely serious matter” (World History 463). This thinking persuaded more men to enlist in the military, just like Paul, and subsequently give up their lives in a war that would never benefit them, only those in power. Propaganda, misinformation, and manipulation were all tactics used by governments to persuade men to fight in the war, and Paul grew aware of this throughout the novel, All Quiet on the Western