Alienated Labor Karl Marx Analysis

Improved Essays
The article that I have chosen to discuss is Alienation from Species-Life from Karl Marx’s Alienated Labor. This article addresses the issues of what makes up our human nature and how alienated labor relates to this. Marx’s main argument is that alienated labor is separating us from what make us human. Karl Marx sees that one of the main foundations of humanity is for humans to produce. This is since; humans are the only species that produces, even if there is not a need. He believes that in a capitalistic society humans only produce to accumulate wealth and do not own the fruits of their labor. This is where he concludes that not owning the fruits of their labor alienates humans from their species. Marx’s article brings us to really question the world we are living in. Are we really doing what we are intended to do? Are we a slave of our own labor? Although these questions come to mind when reading this article, I would still have to disagree with Marx. I disagree with Marx’s idea that labor in a system of capitalism is Alienating us from our own human nature or species-being. Where I disagree with Marx’s argument is that humans producing even if there is no need are a part of our species-being or human nature, that humans not owning …show more content…
He believed that alienated labor was one of the main reasons for misery in the world. In this view, we are considered slaves to labor, and that it alienates us from others and ourselves. Marx would consider capitalistic societies to be creating this feeling of alienation. Where I have to disagree with him is whether or not we really exist as slaves to our laborers. I don't believe this because in a system of capitalism your decisions in life determine where you end up. If we were really slaves wouldn't we not have choices because those would already be predetermined. In this system there is nothing stopping anyone from being

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this piece, Marx discusses the concept of “Estranged Labour”, about which he goes into great detail. He begins by stating that the current political economy takes the worker from the level of a human, to that of a commodity. He describes this as “the most wretched of commodities”, as the commodification of the worker is always done in contrast to success of the land owner. This creates two classes, the property owners and the propertyless workers, with a stark distinction between the two. The political economy that creates this distinction is run by greed, which is fueled by competition.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes that the working class or proletariat needs to overthrow the bourgeoisie and that private property should be abolished (Marx 22-23). Abolishing private property would get rid of tension between classes. Owning private property is a capitalist idea therefore it needs to be abolished. Getting rid of private property gives more power to the working class and creates equality in the sense that no one individual is above one another. Also people would not be profiting off of private…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Like the classical economists, he focused on the dynamic evolution of capitalism as a system, and the turbulent relationships between different classes. ”(Stanford p.54) During the Mid-nineteenth century, Marx opposed capitalism, believing “payment of profit on private investments did not reflect any particular economic function” (Stanford p.54). Marx is saying that the workers aren’t getting paid for the amount of work they put in. Capitalists were exploiting these workers and rather than sharing the wealth/profits, they were paying the workers a diminished amount (Labor Theory of Value).…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of the capitalist is to achieve the largest profit margin as possible. The workers can usually never own anything except their labor, which is their means of making money. Marx lived during the industrial revolution, which saw the advent of tremendous wealth due to the large number of factories being built during this time. Living and working conditions were sub par for the working class during these times. People worked really long and laborious hours for generally a small amount of money, which in turn made the factory owners abundantly wealthy.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The separation between capitalist and the working class is unfair and uneven. To Marx, “If the wealth of a society is decreasing, the worker suffers most, for although the working class cannot gain as much as the property owners when society is prospering, none suffers more cruelly from its decline than the working class” (Marx, page 284, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, First Manuscript). He concludes that this makes a worker a slave to capitalism; his or her spirit chained to the robotic and mechanical motions of labor. He finds that these people become, “depressed, therefore, both intellectually and physically to the level of a machine, and from being a man becomes an abstract activity and a stomach, so he also becomes more and more dependent on every fluctuation in the market price, in the investment of capital and in the whims of the wealthy.” (Marx, page 285, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, First Manuscript).…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith Research Paper

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I hope this letter finds you well, and you are doing okay. I got your message about wanting to know about the relationship between the market, and the state. I am happy to tell you that I have researched it, and I can now discuss this topic for you. While doing my research for this topic, I came across articles by Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes. In short I have learned that the state should have some form of intervention in the markets.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrastingly, Marx believes that not all humans are free. Although he is against the class system, he believed that it remained an issue in society and that “there was a strain in all societies because the social organization never kept pace with the development of the means of production” (W.B.E.190b). Marx believed that while the ruling class had freedom the Proletariat did not. They were controlled by their employers and thus, did not have the freedom that the employers, or production owners, had. For example, while the owners of any privately owned means of production could decide to take a day off for whatever reason, the working class beneath them could not.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In keeping with the format in which the Questions this week were posed, I will write them out as Question(s) one, two and three. Question one, was Marx right about Capitalism in the 19th century being based on the exploitation of the worker? yes, I believe so. Exploitation doesn't simply mean to take advantage the worker in a terribly negative way, but rather that in their society then and in ours now, we have things such as land lords, who collect rent, Corporations who use human work forces to get their work done, and agencies who make a profit off of the people.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When Karl Marx (2003) talks about labour in a political economy, he argues that the workers are “degraded to the most miserable sort of commodity” (p. 6)—in other words, the workers are being exploited by owners of private property. He introduces the concept of alienation, describing how workers become externalized not only from their labour and the product of their labour, but also from their species’ being and other workers. This, as a result reduces the workers’ capabilities of seeking their greatest potential, leaving them powerless. While Marx is able to explain how alienated labour is developed, are the ideas around alienation only confined to labour? This paper will discuss the ways in which alienation is conceptualized and applied…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This leads to alienation from the work process; this is intimately connected to alienation from the product but rather focuses on how the process is inherently alienating in itself (Marx, 1844). Consequently the focus is not on the disconnect to the final product (Pappenheim, 1959). This is perhaps the most straightforward way in which our species being is being violated. As has been outlined, capitalism creates specialisation, the mechanisation of the human. What defines prosperity under Marxism is the opposite.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two authors have both a similar and very different view of labor and economics. Considering Marx is from Germany, he has strong views. He is obviously, the communist/socialist. His basic belief is that wealth is the direct result of labor. He believes that what you put in is what you get out.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The theory of alienation is ‘the intellectual construct in which Marx displays the devastating effect of capitalist production on human beings, on their physical and mental states and on the social processes of which they are a part’ (Ollman, 1996). Marx’s theory is based on the observation that within the capitalist mode of production, workers invariably lose determination of their lives by being deprived of the right to regard themselves as the director of their actions. Alienation refers to the social alienation of people from aspects of their human nature and can be defined as a condition whereby individuals are governed by institutes of their own creation in capitalist society such as; religion, the state and economy, all of which are…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Marx). Marx argues that while the workers, like the ones mentioned in both works of literature loose themselves to the capitalist system, doing strenuous labor in exchange for money, money that is used to buy the product they themselves helped produced. “The worker receives a part of the available means of subsistence from the capitalist. For what purpose do these means of subsistence serve him? For immediate [664] consumption.”…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays