Alexander The Great: The Achievements Of Alexander The Great

Improved Essays
Alexander the Great is credited with being an exceptional ruler who conquered the majority of the known word. Accomplishing some of the most impressive and elaborate conquerings in the 300s BCE, Alexander the Great had an empire spanning from Egypt to Asia. Alexander was able to achieve such victories through his short life because of his father, his army, and his impeccable leadership abilities. A lot of the accomplishments made by Alexander the Greats can be attributed to his father Phillips II. Phillip wanted to ensure that Alexander would become both an intellectual and philosophical person. Philip hired Aristotle to tutor Alexander in Philosophy, politics, and science from a young age. The philosophy taught to Alexander influenced …show more content…
Alexander’s army was made up of 32,000 highly trained men that were loyal to their leader. (Mark, Joshua. "Alexander the Great."). Alexander leads his army from the front and not the back like most generals, he would not drink water if there was not enough for the rest of the soldiers. Alexanders army was also extremely skilled and innovative. The army was split into smaller groups that each had their own leader so that there would be much better communication and organization. The phalanx was a very successful technic for the army, it required a group of men to be in a tight group and constantly pushing forward(Donal L. Wasson, The Army of Alexander the Great). This technic worked because the men in Alexander’s army were all loyal, they would not move from the formation even though the outermost men were exposed and were very likely to be killed during a …show more content…
Alexander united his cultures instead of forcefully converting each new territory. That tactic was what allowed Alexander to obtain that much territory without many revolts. This can be seen when Alexander took over Ephesos and instead of imposing his belief onto them, he offered to rebuilt their Temple(Mark, Joshua. Alexander the Great). Alexander had also conquered Egypt, and even went as far as to visit and Egyptian oracle so that he could be titled the son of Zeus. Alexander showed how much he wanted to unite cultures from this example because he went to an Egyptian oracle in Egypt to proclaim himself a son of Zeus, a Greek God. Alexander the Great really wanted to connect the Greek and Persian cultures. He appointed Persians high military statuses in his military. Alexander the Great was fine with allowing other cultures to keep their practices as long as they did not cause trouble for him. Alexander had also come up with an amazing idea that establishes one universal language instead of many obsolete languages. He chose to make Greek the universal language. Alexander created the Hellenistic era by using The Greek language, as well as mixed in Greek influence throughout his vast

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He was brave man; he would rather die than be bribed to leave his family, and even though his wife did not give birth to a boy he didn’t sleep with another women he improvised by adopting his nephew’s son. Caesar’s mapping skills were excellent because they were easily understood by his men in which making most of campaigns successful. He was a reasonable man; he signed treaties and he knew when it was time to attack and when it was time to retreat. Caesar’s nine year reign, of being roman general, demonstrated what it really takes to win. The ambition in his heart to conquer is a real good motivation of success.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Campaigns of Alexander the Great by Arrian is easily comparable to The Funeral Oration of Pericles by Thucydides since these two primary sources exemplify the maximum power of the pre-Roman leaders in antiquity. Alexander the Great and Pericles both had complete authority and admiration of their men, but both likewise encountered troubling periods amongst their men. In the case of Alexander, his kinsmen were far from home, and were questioning why they persisted to fight under, and with, Alexander. Pericles’s people doubted anything they might accomplish about the war in Peloponnese. Throughout their speeches, they possessed the aptitude to persuade.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar transformed Rome from a growing empire into a mighty empire. Throughout many battles, many affairs and many risks, Caesar became one of the most feared leaders in history. He had other leaders running away from him or trying to take him down for many years, and no foreign leaders accomplished their goal. Caesar was not only strong in a military sense, he was one of the smartest leaders as well. Julius Caesar was a successful leader because he knew how to manage his power and popularity, he handled foreign policy very well, and he knew how to show his strengths.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great and Julius were both charamistac conqueror who were respects and left behind a legacy so great it is remembered thousands of years in the future. Alexander and Julius also built two of the greatest empires known to man. They also were both probably megalomaniacs and definitely had an ego problems. They also have probably some of the most notable military tactics and battles they won. They also caused massive power rifts after their deaths leading to civil wars.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is why he was so involved in the Gallic Wars. Due to his many accomplishments during these wars, Julius Caesar was elected to Pontifex Maximus or high priest and then elected as Consul. In these positions, Caesar assisted in the creation of programs that would increase the use of sanitation for the people. It is said that Caesar stated, “ 'No condemnation could be too severe if Caesar did not hold the lives of his soldiers dearer than his own” (JC,2). He would also push for the soldiers to personalize their own weapons which caused the soldiers to feel as if their weapons were just as special as a major officer’s weapons.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He knew how to take the fear out of his army and throw them at the face of danger without and scare from any of them. “Excerpts from “The Anabasis of Alexander,” A.D. 171 “He was … very heroic in courage, … He was very clever in recognising what was necessary to be done, when others were still in a state of uncertainty; … In … ruling an army, he was exceedingly skillful” this was very important for him being a ruler. Without traits like this he would of never conquered as much land or accumulated as much power. In alexander's last battle he fought to the death of him “Excerpts from “In the Footsteps of Alexander the Great.” 1997 “The exact cause of Alexander’s death has never been determined. He, of course, suffered greatly during his campaigns, enduring at least 21 wounds that, at one point, left his so [hurt] he could not speak above a whisper.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great’s empire was the most successful military force of any Ancient Mediterranean civilization. From Alex’s battle tactics and doing new, maybe even crazy, things to win all the way to him conquering the vast majority of the known world and it’s civilizations. Even more than those things though is his cultural influence after his…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, he treated them as friends and kinsmen so that his kingdom would not be filled with warfare, banishments and secret plots. In this way he could mediate and govern the world (Plutarch 4). He conquered the Persians so that instead of him treating them as leaders, they would treat him as a leader. Alexander deserved to be called, the Great, because of his strategic military skills, ambition to become a great leader at a young age, and the way he maintained and controlled his empire when he was the king (Plutarch 4). A larger empire was something Alexander lusted for.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander III achieved many things in his life, including his leadership of the best military at the time, control of one of the biggest empires ever, and influence on many kinds of cultures. All of these achievements show that Alexander deserves to be great. The main reason that most people know Alexander is that he conquered a great radius of land. The amount of land he conquered is around 2,000,000 sq miles, this feat made Macedonia one of the biggest empires, however, 10 years after his death, the huge empire of Macedonia splits apart. Alexander started his conquering spree at 20 years of age and to conquer it all took 11 years, making him one of the youngest people in history to achieve such an extraordinary deed.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A great deal of respect was earned through success in battle, and was equated to a man’s ability to lead in government. Prominent figures like Pompey and Caesar were so successful because of the abilities they showed early in their careers. Augustus did not immediately establish himself as a threat during the battles against Caesar’s assassins. In fact, when he and Antony led their army against Brutus and Cassius in 42 BC, Augustus “disgraced himself in the first of the two actions by taking to his tent with illness” (Potter 172). Surely, if this weakness…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays