Alexander The Great Plutarch's View

Superior Essays
The View of Alexander the Great and His Relative Divinity Throughout the book ‘The Life of Alexander’, which is written by Plutarch, the idea of Alexander the Great seeing himself or being perceived as a god is addressed several times. After reading the book I believe that while Alexander did not think of himself as a god by birth, he believed that he had been gifted the qualities of a god, which could be taken away by the gods just as easily as they were given. Alexander the Great may have not seen himself as a god, but he did cultivate the image of his divine power in order to assert his authority over others and increase his ability to conquer other lands. As his life neared its end, Alexander saw himself in a more ‘mortal’ sense, speaking …show more content…
Rumors about his birth including a dream of his mother’s womb being struck with a lightning bolt, how his birth must have been attended by Artemis, and that his mother was the consort of a high being circulated, which likely added to the idea of Alexander being a divine being. Another instant that could have added to the people seeing Alexander as divine was that three major victories happened on the day of his birth, and it was said that “…the son whose birth coincided with three victories would himself prove invincible.” Alexander surely grew up with people claiming that he was divine, which likely led to his own portrayal of himself as a divine being, but I do not think that he thought of himself as a god. Later on in ‘The Life of Alexander’ Plutarch mentions an exchange between Alexander and a greek priest who addressed him as “…O, son of Zeus, and that Alexander was delighted at this slip of pronunciation…” This likely furthered the idea that Alexander was a divine being, but I still believe that at his core Alexander knew he was merely a …show more content…
In order to be a divine being one often lived with the gods, or feasted on ambrosia, the food of the gods, or bled ichor, the blood of the gods. In ‘The Life of Alexander’ Plutarch recalls a moment “…some years later, when he had been wounded by an arrow and was in great pain, he remarked, ‘What you see flowing, my friends, is blood, and not that Ichor which flows in the veins of the blessed immortals in heaven.’” This shows that Alexander clearly saw himself lacking some aspects of being a true god, but doesn’t deny the fact that he still could have seen himself as having divine aspects. Towards the end of his life, “…he began to believe that he had lost the favor of the gods, and he became increasingly suspicious of his friends.” This again shows that Plutarch portrayed Alexander as knowing that he had been gifted his divine powers by the gods, and that he arguably did not see himself as a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Also in source D he gave a man a talent making him very rich. In conclusion, Alexander does deserve to be called “Alexander the Great”.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This shows Alexander cared about others since he would not kill innocent people. Exceptional leaders, as well as great people would not kill innocent people. Another reason Alexander was great is found in document D. Document D states they were on a long tough journey through the desert and needed water. They found a little bit of water, but there was not enough so he poured it out because his attitude was if there is not enough water for everyone then nobody could have it. This evidence matters for the reason that it shows he cared about his soldiers and wanted to be fair and not selfish.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But besides his brilliant leadership in battle, Plutarch writes of an unselfish side to Alexander where he gives away his riches to his companions, and of having bronze statues made for fallen soldiers after a battle. (page 4) This portrays Alexander as, not only an effective leader, but one that is almost flawless. Although there are those that disagree, Plutarch’s version of Alexander most definitely deserves to be called Alexander the Great.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also, Alexander conveyed his intelligence throughout his years as a leader. ” Alexander returned to the Persian city of Susa, where he tried to unify his huge empire by taking Darius’s daughter as his second wife and ordering officers to marry Persian women.” (Background essay) In other words, When Alexander wanted something done, he found a way to make sure it happened. In this case, Alexander…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    but it still shows that he cares about what the gods think of him and his public image. Even though he did do some bad stuff it was overcome by all of the great stuff that he did. Those were my opinions on why Alexander the great really was great. I hope I provided valuable info in this topic…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Once Alexander III of Macedonia’s father died, he inherited his throne and took over his empire at the age of twenty. Following in his father’s footsteps, he controlled a vast area of land, from Greece to Egypt extending to the Hindu Kush Mountains. Alexander did conquer over 3,000 miles of land, which is absurd, but his ruthless and sadistic manner doesn’t deserve the honoring title of “great”. Alexander was so power hungry, that his actions became deadly. He would pilfer every town and eradicate any obstacle in his quest for victory.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander liked to win and he was very powerful. He was able to…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alexander the Great has been revered as military genius, tactician, and godlike conqueror. Many of the accounts taken down of his life make him out to be the hero of Western culture and practice. The peoples he conquered and the territories he took over worshipped him as a god and even placed him alongside the likes of Zeus and Ra. The main source used to gain knowledge of Alexander’s life stems from historians and philosophers, such as Quintus Curtius, Plutarch, and Arrian. These writers recorded the events that took place in his life as though they shared close ties to Alexander.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In spite of the fact that he was pulling together his boundless realm, the Macedonians felt they were losing their pioneer. He began self-love to unite his differed regions with a typical religion, yet he brought it too far with prokynesis. (Prokynesis is the demonstration of bowing before somebody) .Alexander had the general population of his realm do as such. After this, Alexander still held quite a bit of his energy, yet it would soon be detracted from…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Polybius began his Histories by reminding Romans of Alexander's achievements, and subsequently, Roman leaders saw him as a role model. Pompey the Great assumed the nickname ‘Magnus’ and searched the captured lands of the east for Alexander's 260-year-old cloak, which he then wore as a sign of greatness. Julius Caesar dedicated a statue but replaced Alexander's head with his own, and Augustus visited Alexander's tomb in Alexandria and briefly changed his seal from a sphinx to Alexander's profile. There has also been some speculation that Julius Caesar wept by a statue of Alexander, embarrassed that the Macedonian had accomplished so much more at a younger age than he had. Plutarch, a Greek who became a Roman who lived four hundred years after Alexander, wrote his Life of Alexander as one of a series of 'Parallel Lives', comparing ancient Greeks with 'modern' Romans (Alexander was compared to Julius…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His only thought on his mind was what he was going to do next, he didn’t think about or care for others. According to “Alexander the Not-So-Great.” “Once he made up his mind to conquer a territory, Alexander the Great was unstoppable.” Another reason why he was a selfish person is that he was too busy worrying about himself, so what ever made him happy…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “It seemed to the Macedonians a very critical time; and some would have persuaded Alexander to give up all thought of retaining the Greecians in subjection by force of arms, and rather to apply himself to win back the gentle means the allegiance of the tribes who were designing revolt, and try the effect of indulgence in arresting the first motions towards a revolution.” (Plutarch, 12) Plutarch explains that the citizens of Macedonia did not want to be ruled by Alexander, but he rejected the ideas previously stated and found this “very critical time” was a time to prove himself and win over the Macedonians, and he did so when he battled in the city of Thebes, and he showed no mercy when he pillaged it. Plutarch wanted these battles to show the power of Alexander, as he often compares him to Julius Caesar for being a great leader, and a calm collected man even though Alexander was not that. Plutarch was biased with Alexander, for he praised him for the choices he had made because he made judgements on Alexander and not the situation. I believe that with his bias Plutarch has a persuasive document with Alexander the Great, which makes me feel as if this writing is credible.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Later Alexander is considered “the son of God. “ When Alexander was born Philip and his wife declared “All…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, Alexander considered himself as the son of a god, specifically Zeus, in the same way Achilles was the son of the goddess Thetis. The manner by which Alexander conducts himself during war shows direct understanding of the lessons taught by Homer’s poems, especially The Iliad. Based on how Alexander led his soldiers during battle, it becomes apparent that he has understood that the best kings put themselves on the same level as their subordinates, which is one of the characteristics of the distinguished leaders in The Iliad. Early in The Iliad, Achilles chastises King Agamemnon for watching others do the fighting, and then taking the lion’s share…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays