Alexander The Great Bloodthirsty Tyrant

Improved Essays
Alexander the Great was seen as one of the most powerful figures ever in the history of people. However, where there is a lot of power there will most likely be room for corruption. Just because his name was Alexander the Great it does not mean that he was a “great” leader. Some historians believe Alexander the Great was an influential leader who spread the ideas of Hellenistic culture during his rule. There is proof that Alexander the Great should be seen as nothing but a bloodthirsty tyrant who was without a doubt crazed for power. Alexander the Great was an egomaniac drunk with lust of conquest because, he solved his problems with violence, led his soldiers to battle for his own conquest, and became obsessed with being treated as a god. …show more content…
He was a god in his own eyes and had his subjects treat him like he was one. One passage that goes deeper Alexander’s life is “Plutarch on Alexander the Great.” Plutarch stated that, Alexander believed that it was only right the he himself should be modeled after statues made by Lysippus. Plutarch also states Alexander had a likeness in the arts of healing. He liked dealing with medicine and even came to the aid his friends when they were sick. He continues on to say that he had a great passion for philosophy and enjoyed the teachings of Aristotle. Basically Plutarch’s testimony states that Alexander the Great was a good man who enjoyed the simple things in Greek life. However, another passage called “The Burial of Alexander the Hephaestion: Ephippus of Olynthus Remembers Alexander the Great” showed the true side of Alexander and his terrible obsessions. Ephippus states that Alexander had a throne of gold in his park and couches with silver that he used to sit on when conducting meetings with friends. In other words, even his own friends were not on his level. Ephippus goes onto to say that at Alexander’s last banquet he made his subjects drank when he drank. Alexander also wore a purple robe, cloven sandals, and Horns of Ammon which made it as if himself were a god. Ephippus continues to say he imitated gods such as Artemis, Hermes, and Heracles by wearing their garments or signature weapons. Lastly, he would have the floor tainted with incense and fragrant wine while it burned and his subjects would standby silent or would only speak good things because they were fearful of Alexander. The 2nd article is most definitely true compared to the 1st one because there is no way an egotistical maniac like Alexander the Great would just enjoy “the simple things in life.” The pieces to the puzzle fit just right into the idea that Alexander the Great

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Also in source D he gave a man a talent making him very rich. In conclusion, Alexander does deserve to be called “Alexander the Great”.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This shows Alexander cared about others since he would not kill innocent people. Exceptional leaders, as well as great people would not kill innocent people. Another reason Alexander was great is found in document D. Document D states they were on a long tough journey through the desert and needed water. They found a little bit of water, but there was not enough so he poured it out because his attitude was if there is not enough water for everyone then nobody could have it. This evidence matters for the reason that it shows he cared about his soldiers and wanted to be fair and not selfish.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But besides his brilliant leadership in battle, Plutarch writes of an unselfish side to Alexander where he gives away his riches to his companions, and of having bronze statues made for fallen soldiers after a battle. (page 4) This portrays Alexander as, not only an effective leader, but one that is almost flawless. Although there are those that disagree, Plutarch’s version of Alexander most definitely deserves to be called Alexander the Great.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great is known as the King of Macedonia and conqueror of the Persian Empire. One of the writers of Alexander, Plutarch was ethnically Greek, but a citizen of Rome. The author takes famous Greek characters and compares them to Roman characters in his biographies; he has created the romantic picture of Alexander and used the story of Alexander to exemplify what is good leadership, and he does emphasize certain values that would be consider good qualities found in a leader, and the outcome of the use of such qualities. Being biased towards the Greeks, Plutarch successfully made his readers to believe that Alexander is a perfect model of leader by emphasizing maturity (insight) and ambition (courage) of Alexander, and by distorting…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also, Alexander conveyed his intelligence throughout his years as a leader. ” Alexander returned to the Persian city of Susa, where he tried to unify his huge empire by taking Darius’s daughter as his second wife and ordering officers to marry Persian women.” (Background essay) In other words, When Alexander wanted something done, he found a way to make sure it happened. In this case, Alexander…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexander of Macedon: A Great Leader Being the first person to conquer the Egyptian, Greek, and Persian empires in just over a decade was no walk in the park, and neither was integrating a culture into all of those empires nor attempting to unite them all. Alexander of Macedon was this man: he conquered the greatest empires, spread the Greek influence, and lead in a unique way with his inspiring character that he is famous for. Although he was not the ideal leader such as Plato’s idea of a philosopher-king, he was an ethical man who wanted his people content. His well-known title, “Alexander the Great,” was very appropriate for him: his fine character and social goals, his unique political leadership and strategic conquering, and his economic…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great was not truly great because he was an inhumane leader and his empire quickly collapsed after he died. Alexander wasn’t truly great because he was inhumane to other people and seemed like a bad general, “Ferocious manhunt…30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified”(Doc C). He obtained 2,000,000 square miles and founded 70 cities(Doc E). However, in nearly every city, Alexander would sell most of the people into slavery and kill the remaining of the people.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander showed no mercy to innocent people, or even his own men. Although history has credited Alexander the “great” with building the largest empire the ancient world has ever seen, few realize his cruel,…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great was a villain who knew how to manipulate people into thinking he was the good guy. Alexander had his fair share of good guy moments but overall Alexander used the good side people saw to manipulate them into doing as he wanted. Due to Alexander’s violence and mistreat to the human race he is villain. When Alexander the Great conquered new land he usually treated the people and the land in a cruel and disrespectful manner.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The View of Alexander the Great and His Relative Divinity Throughout the book ‘The Life of Alexander’, which is written by Plutarch, the idea of Alexander the Great seeing himself or being perceived as a god is addressed several times. After reading the book I believe that while Alexander did not think of himself as a god by birth, he believed that he had been gifted the qualities of a god, which could be taken away by the gods just as easily as they were given. Alexander the Great may have not seen himself as a god, but he did cultivate the image of his divine power in order to assert his authority over others and increase his ability to conquer other lands. As his life neared its end, Alexander saw himself in a more ‘mortal’ sense, speaking…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alexander the Great has been revered as military genius, tactician, and godlike conqueror. Many of the accounts taken down of his life make him out to be the hero of Western culture and practice. The peoples he conquered and the territories he took over worshipped him as a god and even placed him alongside the likes of Zeus and Ra. The main source used to gain knowledge of Alexander’s life stems from historians and philosophers, such as Quintus Curtius, Plutarch, and Arrian. These writers recorded the events that took place in his life as though they shared close ties to Alexander.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great is considered the Greatest, because he has never been defeated in a battle. Alexander is still considered one of the most successful military leaders in history. Even though Alexander the Great is a legend, he still has ton of accomplishments and the impact after his death. When Alexanders father was assassinated during the invasion on the Persian empire that’s when he became king Alexander. Further more into the next paragraph we will be talking about how Alexander made all of those accomplishments, There are so many things that Alexander the Great has accomplished and one of them is when Alexander was the king of Macedonia and how he conquered an empire that was from Balkans to modern–Pakistan.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His only thought on his mind was what he was going to do next, he didn’t think about or care for others. According to “Alexander the Not-So-Great.” “Once he made up his mind to conquer a territory, Alexander the Great was unstoppable.” Another reason why he was a selfish person is that he was too busy worrying about himself, so what ever made him happy…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was very important in Western Civilization, he conquered more land than any other king in this time. His reign as the King of Macedonia was important because he was able to lay down the foundations for the Hellenistic era. Alexander was the son of Phillip of Macedonia and king of Macedonia. His father, who had died wanted revenge on Persia and Alexander continued with his father’s plan to seek revenge against the Persians. Alexander on the other hand wanted total conquest, he had a dream of one world.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, Alexander considered himself as the son of a god, specifically Zeus, in the same way Achilles was the son of the goddess Thetis. The manner by which Alexander conducts himself during war shows direct understanding of the lessons taught by Homer’s poems, especially The Iliad. Based on how Alexander led his soldiers during battle, it becomes apparent that he has understood that the best kings put themselves on the same level as their subordinates, which is one of the characteristics of the distinguished leaders in The Iliad. Early in The Iliad, Achilles chastises King Agamemnon for watching others do the fighting, and then taking the lion’s share…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays