Alexander is deserving of the name “the Great” because he conquered all the land also, He was very giving. In document A ,it states “He conquered 11 cities and put them in his name ” Also, in document A he had about “40,000 men”. “This is shows that he is great because he was able to conquer and put them in his name also he had over 40,000 trustworthy men. In document E , It states “he was giving ”. It describes in source D he was giving by saying “He poured the water on the ground performing a miracle”.…
As he traveled, he fought in many battles with 5 major battles. He was almost always successful. So, the big question is how great is Alexander The Great?Alexander was great for these reasons; his concern for others, lasting legacy and his remarkable achievements. Alexander was great due to of his concern for others. For example, document C states during the battle of Tyre if you surrendered to him or sought sanctuary at the temple he would not kill you.…
Soon after his father's death, alexander took his fathers thrown and was in power and control. He used this opportunity to successfully conquer the Persian empire. he had a very powerful army, and he was known to be a genius for the military force. Alexander also succeeded to colonize the city of tyre.…
Alexander used his smartness and quick-thinking skills to win battles in the heat of the moment. Once he was about to cross a river when he saw that Porus, the enemy, was directly across from him and his army, “When Alexander saw this, he [decided to] move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled” (Doc A). In like manner in a game of…
Courage is the only thing that Alexander the Great definitely had. He stayed strong in the empire's weakest times. Living in the world that this empire took place in, was very tough. Many empires and city-states want power more than anything else. Alexander had the ability to conquer more land than any other empire in ancient times (Doc A and C).…
Alexander of Macedon: A Great Leader Being the first person to conquer the Egyptian, Greek, and Persian empires in just over a decade was no walk in the park, and neither was integrating a culture into all of those empires nor attempting to unite them all. Alexander of Macedon was this man: he conquered the greatest empires, spread the Greek influence, and lead in a unique way with his inspiring character that he is famous for. Although he was not the ideal leader such as Plato’s idea of a philosopher-king, he was an ethical man who wanted his people content. His well-known title, “Alexander the Great,” was very appropriate for him: his fine character and social goals, his unique political leadership and strategic conquering, and his economic…
Alexander the Great was not truly great because he was an inhumane leader and his empire quickly collapsed after he died. Alexander wasn’t truly great because he was inhumane to other people and seemed like a bad general, “Ferocious manhunt…30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified”(Doc C). He obtained 2,000,000 square miles and founded 70 cities(Doc E). However, in nearly every city, Alexander would sell most of the people into slavery and kill the remaining of the people.…
Once Alexander III of Macedonia’s father died, he inherited his throne and took over his empire at the age of twenty. Following in his father’s footsteps, he controlled a vast area of land, from Greece to Egypt extending to the Hindu Kush Mountains. Alexander did conquer over 3,000 miles of land, which is absurd, but his ruthless and sadistic manner doesn’t deserve the honoring title of “great”. Alexander was so power hungry, that his actions became deadly. He would pilfer every town and eradicate any obstacle in his quest for victory.…
Alexander the Great was worthy for his title. In the text it states,” The prince took charge in companion cavalry at age 18… Alexander became king of Macedonia at the age of 20.” This quote proves my opinion because he was in charge of the cavalry at a very young age, and he was responsible for the cavalry. Another piece of evidence to support my claim is,” Alexander’s army consisted of 40,000 soldiers… by a lion.” This quote proves my claim because he had lots of people in his own army that would protect Alexander’s citizens.…
Alexander liked to win and he was very powerful. He was able to…
There are villains in this world that do many horrid things, but there are also heroes. Alexander the Great is one of those heroes that lived many years ago. He was a hero because after every battle he visited his wounded soldiers to see how they were doing. In Section 3 of Chapter 5, it says, “ He visited all of his wounded men after each battle.”…
Alexander the Great is not that great because nothing is cool about putting his military in many wars and pressure. According to article “Study Say Alexander Not So Great.” “A young Alexander the Great thundered across what is now the Middle East on a bloody mission that ranks among the most brilliant military conquests in history. ”(#1).…
Next, Alexander the Great was genuine when dealing with a potential…
Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…
His cavalry rode down the Persian line as a gap opened between Darius’ and Bessus’ men (Wasson; Hickman). Alexander saw the gap and went for Darius (Langley, 19). If Alexander did not decide to go for Darius then the spread of Greek culture may not have occurred. He then threw a spear at Darius and it missed him by inches (Wasson). Darius then fled as well as many of his men (Hunter, 26-27; Hickman).…