Alexander III As A Historical Figure In History

Improved Essays
There is a plethora of historical figures in history, but some of these figures are more acknowledged and discussed about than others. The Macedonian general, Alexander III, also referred to as Alexander the Great, is one of the more prominent historical figures. There is no question that Alexander is famous for his undefeated streak during his military campaigns. However, many historians are in constant debate over whether or not Alexander was truly a military leader that deserved to be a highly prominent figure in history. They dispute over whether or not he is entitled to his nickname of Alexander the Great. Some historians argue that Alexander’s constant victories on the battle field provide a sound reason for Alexander to be deemed great. The opposing side refutes that the ruling methods and actions during his reign makes him a questionable leader. …show more content…
The most common belief amongst Alexander’s critics is that he was a cruel and inattentive ruler. However, historians who believe this misconception fail to acknowledge the evidence that expresses Alexander’s redeeming qualities such as good leadership and loyalty to soldiers and friends. These historians also do not realize that a crucial aspect to a great leader is to be successful, which Alexander has more than demonstrated with his triumphs and guidance over territories under his control. Alexander III is entitled to be a distinguished historical figure and has rightfully earned the dignified title “Alexander the Great” through his remarkable leadership, the substantial impact that he had over his conquered territories, and his personal consideration for others, despite the fallacy that he was tyrannical. As a military leader, Alexander had extremely impressive leadership skills and tactics. He demonstrated his ability to be a successful commander through multiple occasions and battles. One of these battles includes the Battle of Granicus River. In Plutarch’s Life of Alexander, Plutarch recalled that when Alexander and his soldiers came across the Granicus River, his soldiers were extremely afraid to cross over the river banks since they feared that the river was too deep and the banks were too rough for them to climb. Alexander demonstrated to his fellow soldiers that they had nothing to fear since he crossed over the river himself and successfully climbed up the river banks. He was able to inspire his men to continue to fight even though they demonstrated a lack of motivation and courage. Furthermore, he showed his perseverance and determination as a commander when he and the Macedonian soldiers faced against Darius and the Persian army. According to Arian in The Anabasis of Alexander, Alexander had only 160 naval ships while Darius had almost double the amount with 300 naval ships. Despite this huge setback with the lack of naval strength, the Macedonian army still emerged victorious in their naval battle against the Persian army. It is evident that Alexander possesses great military skills to be able to train his soldiers well enough to defeat a much larger enemy. Alexander was a formidable commander who served as a backbone to his troops, leading and unifying the soldiers together. As a result, the Macedonian army was a strong cohesive unit who became a daunting force in the ancient world. Some people may argue that it was incredibly selfish for Alexander to have his men cross Granicus River, but his actions should be deemed as selfless instead. He could have easily commanded his men to test out the safety of the river first and cross over when he discovered that the river did not threaten his life. However, he decided to cross over the river before any of his men, which demonstrates that he was a courageous leader and did not prioritize himself over the other soldiers. Although this instance appeared as if Alexander forced his men to continue into battle, regardless of their own will, this was definitely not the case. Plutarch also stated that Alexander permitted his men to rest in quarters whenever they were tired. He allowed his men to leave when they wished and did not force anyone to continue on the expedition if they were unwilling. This information reveals that the claim that Alexander was selfish is unfounded and that he clearly was

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Also in source D he gave a man a talent making him very rich. In conclusion, Alexander does deserve to be called “Alexander the Great”.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As he traveled, he fought in many battles with 5 major battles. He was almost always successful. So, the big question is how great is Alexander The Great?Alexander was great for these reasons; his concern for others, lasting legacy and his remarkable achievements. Alexander was great due to of his concern for others. For example, document C states during the battle of Tyre if you surrendered to him or sought sanctuary at the temple he would not kill you.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great: r.336-323 BC. Commander: 11 years of war, he never lost. He was from Macedonia, and was the most popular conquerer of all time. He was the son of the Macedonian king Philip the second. Macedonia, which was located in the northern edge of Greece, tried to incorporate the Greek culture.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But besides his brilliant leadership in battle, Plutarch writes of an unselfish side to Alexander where he gives away his riches to his companions, and of having bronze statues made for fallen soldiers after a battle. (page 4) This portrays Alexander as, not only an effective leader, but one that is almost flawless. Although there are those that disagree, Plutarch’s version of Alexander most definitely deserves to be called Alexander the Great.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander used his smartness and quick-thinking skills to win battles in the heat of the moment. Once he was about to cross a river when he saw that Porus, the enemy, was directly across from him and his army, “When Alexander saw this, he [decided to] move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled” (Doc A). In like manner in a game of…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great was not truly great because he was an inhumane leader and his empire quickly collapsed after he died. Alexander wasn’t truly great because he was inhumane to other people and seemed like a bad general, “Ferocious manhunt…30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified”(Doc C). He obtained 2,000,000 square miles and founded 70 cities(Doc E). However, in nearly every city, Alexander would sell most of the people into slavery and kill the remaining of the people.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Once Alexander III of Macedonia’s father died, he inherited his throne and took over his empire at the age of twenty. Following in his father’s footsteps, he controlled a vast area of land, from Greece to Egypt extending to the Hindu Kush Mountains. Alexander did conquer over 3,000 miles of land, which is absurd, but his ruthless and sadistic manner doesn’t deserve the honoring title of “great”. Alexander was so power hungry, that his actions became deadly. He would pilfer every town and eradicate any obstacle in his quest for victory.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Homer’s epics have left an undisputable and profound influence on Western literature. However, outside of the realm of literature, Homer’s ideas about honor, kingship, and leadership continued to affect the political world hundreds of years after his death. Specifically, Homer’s impact on Alexander the Great played a central role in not only the way Alexander saw himself, but also in the way he established and ruled the largest empire on earth. From an early age, Alexander was exposed to The Iliad and The Odyssey under the instruction of his teacher, Aristotle. The parallels between Alexander and Achilles are striking; for instance, both are undoubtedly the most remarkable warriors.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people think he was a hero because while referring to the textbook, “Alexander’s efforts to build an empire made him one of the greatest conquerors in history”, thus giving him the name Alexander “the Great”. Conversely, what really was important was how he ruled and conquered; most of his “genius” ideas came from his father, not him. Doc: 2 stated, “Army that he had was good only because of Philip of Macedon’s reorganization, reformed and strengthened army”. Only with Philip’s army, Alexander could have gone far with “his” success. Consequently Alexander the great wasn’t much of a…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great is not that great because nothing is cool about putting his military in many wars and pressure. According to article “Study Say Alexander Not So Great.” “A young Alexander the Great thundered across what is now the Middle East on a bloody mission that ranks among the most brilliant military conquests in history. ”(#1).…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His battle triumphs were, and still are, astounding, and he did not lose a significant battle in all of his campaigns. His most celebrated victory was at the Battle of Gaugamela in 331 BC in what today is Iraq. His leadership was successful in part due to his ability to motivate his soldiers, focus his army on a common enemy, and lead from the front. Hannibal, Julius Caesar, and Napoleon all studied his military methods and widely acknowledged that they would have never had reached the heights they did without Alexander’s experience to draw from.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alexander the Great has been revered as military genius, tactician, and godlike conqueror. Many of the accounts taken down of his life make him out to be the hero of Western culture and practice. The peoples he conquered and the territories he took over worshipped him as a god and even placed him alongside the likes of Zeus and Ra. The main source used to gain knowledge of Alexander’s life stems from historians and philosophers, such as Quintus Curtius, Plutarch, and Arrian. These writers recorded the events that took place in his life as though they shared close ties to Alexander.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the great was a great war leader who took over lands from Egypt to India, conquering the persian empire by the age of 30. I will show you how alexander the great was great through different bits of evidence. The evidence that I am using is from the legend of the helmet and headband, Alexander’s legacy, and the conquering of tyre. This evidence is from the legend of the helmet and the legend of the headband.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander, an admired individual, was considered great. Several achievements such as his brilliant mind, courage, and undefeated record for winning battles could be just a few of the reasons why Alexander was called a great. Adding the term “ the Great “ to a name indicated the leadership of a king. Someone who does what is right even when their are consequences, someone who is fearless, and someone who does the best for their country is a good leader. Alexander was great because he showed leadership and all of these characteristics throughout his entire life.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The life and history of Alexander the Great, and the empire that he formed, has been studied by people ever since his death. Alexander’s empire ruled over a large portion of land from Greece in the west to India, in the east. His actions brought an end to the long standing conflict that the Persians and Greeks had with each other, established multiple cities that bore his name across the land that he conquered, had a major influence on future rulers, and had remnants that lasted until the time of the Roman Empire. Alexander not only had a prominent place in history, but he also contributed to advancements in military tactics of the ancient world. The life of Alexander had a far reaching effect on world history that lasted for centuries after his death, and the study of his life can help a person understand various facets of history that were inspired or influenced by his actions.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays