Alexander Hamilton's Ideas On The Structure Of The Government?

Improved Essays
“Even to observe neutrality you must have a strong government,” said Alexander Hamilton. After the Constitution was written, the people were trying to decide on how the government should be run and based upon. There were two political parties, Jeffersonians and Hamiltonians. The Jeffersonians were Democratic-Republican and the Hamiltonians were the Federalists. Although Jefferson had amazing views, I agree with Hamilton’s on the structure of government, who should govern the nation, and what the economics were going to be based on.
Although Thomas Jefferson’s ideas on how the structure of the government should be are excellent, I agree with Alexander Hamilton’s more. Alexander Hamilton pictured the United States’ ideal government like the British, a strong central government. Hamilton wanted to increase the number of government officials, as well as a loose interpretation of the Constitution. By this he meant that if the Constitution did not
…show more content…
I strongly agree with Hamilton’s idea on the balancement of the economy; agriculture, trade, finance, and manufacturing. I agree with Hamilton wanting the economy to be balanced like this because the trade will help form alliances with other countries that we need products from. Hamilton also wanted to give trade, finance, and manufacturing government aid. Giving government aid to trade would make the trades more efficient because the ships would be able to travel further to bring back other products needed as well as give products to other countries.
Although Jefferson had really good points in who should govern, how the government should be structured, and the economy, I still agree with Hamilton the most. How to structure a new nation, who should govern the country, and how to balance the economy are the most important topics for a new found nation. The ideas Hamilton had for an ideal government is how I would create a new government if it was up to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The members of this party supported a strong central government, a large peacetime army and navy, and a stable financial system. The Federalist had the political philosophy of Federalism, Nationalism and Industrialization. Their ideals consisted of the Belief in a strong federal system of governance and the promotion of a fiscally sound and nationalistic government. Looking at modern day politics, the Democratic Party seems to have a looser view of the constitution compared to the Republican Party. The democrats seem to think that federal government should play more of a role in our lives.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists supported the ideas of the Constitution because they favored and wanted a strong central, federal government. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists. Alexander tried to convince the citizens of New York to ratify the Constitution because they would miss out on being part of the new United States. Hamilton started to write a series of articles that would become published in the New York newspapers. The purpose behind writing these articles in the New York newspapers was to advocate for ratifying the Constitution and to say why the states needed a strong central government.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Constitution and why this type of government with a stronger but evenly balanced federal government was the best choice for the United States of America. The Federalist Papers were written to help endear those states, unsure of the yet to be ratified U.S. Constitution. The government’s first constitution “The Articles of Confederation” was rushed and flawed in the Federalists eyes in that the Federal Government basically lacked the power to keep the country unified as opposed to the states being territories doing whatever they wanted with no…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main argument came from those who believed this new Constitution would strengthen government at the expense of its people and independent states. Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being willing to sacrifice more ultimately benefits everyone. Daniel Shays deserves credit for creating the Constitution because he fought for reforming government to have the capital and authority to do more for disenfranchised Americans. Shays’ Rebellion exacerbated the need for national unity and strength. The rationale against crediting Daniel Shays is that it would be similar to crediting King George III for writing the…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The establishment of these processes created ““the system of checks and balances”…[which] refers to the way the Constitution seeks to prevent any branch of the national government from dominating the other two” (Foner, p. 260). This is one of the strengths that made the United States constitution one of the most greatly appreciated parts of the government. One of the most important architects to the United States political system was James Madison. Madison is considered one of the most influential men that pushed for the establishment of the new government. He is also referred to as the “father of the Constitution” (Foner, p. 257).…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without one of the men, America would not be the only world superpower, an industrial giant, and the world’s watchdog for freedom. That man is Alexander Hamilton, and I believe that his policies helped the United States the most. Though Thomas Jefferson had some excellent points, I side with Hamilton on many key issues, such as the decisions he made as the Secretary of the Treasury, his support of a strong central government, and his reasoning for loose constructionism. One of the most controversial items that make people ignore Hamilton as a reasonable politician was one of the smartest actions that any of the Founders made at the…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When a convention was held to revise the weak Articles of Confederation, the representatives from each state ultimately created an entirely new document - the Constitution. The government under the Constitution was praised by some, saying that a stronger central government was exactly what the country needed. These people began calling themselves Federalists and interpreted the Constitution broadly to execute their ideals of a strong federal government. Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution was giving the federal government too much power and that state legislatures should have most of the power. These people began calling themselves Democratic-Republicans and interpreted the Constitution strictly to execute their ideals of a weaker…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In disagreement with those that opposed a strong central government, contended that it was necessary. In Federalist 1, Alexander Hamilton explains the necessity for ratification. It states “it will therefore be of use to begin by examining the advantages of that Union, the certain evils, and the probable dangers, to which every State will be exposed from its dissolution.” Alexander Hamilton is stating to allow the passage of the new constitution to keep that nation stable, and promote a non-hostile environment. This is a departure from the events that lead up to the Articles of Confederation. In order to do this, Alexander Hamilton along with the other authors of the Federalist Papers, required a strong central government.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists from the pre-Constitutional era remained Federalists, while Jeffersonians named themselves Democratic-Republican. President Washington warned about the dangers of political parties because they would divide the government and the nation into sides. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson led their parties, the Federalist and the Democratic-Republic respectively. As Washington had predicted, the nation was divided between two points of views, but political parties allow people to choose a side upon matters of supporting different ideas. Although Democratic-Republicans favored the common man, Federalists appeared more appealing because they favored the elite and the educated, prefered a strong federal government, and applied a loose construction of the Constitution.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays