Alexander Hamilton's Ideas On The Structure Of The Government?

Improved Essays
“Even to observe neutrality you must have a strong government,” said Alexander Hamilton. After the Constitution was written, the people were trying to decide on how the government should be run and based upon. There were two political parties, Jeffersonians and Hamiltonians. The Jeffersonians were Democratic-Republican and the Hamiltonians were the Federalists. Although Jefferson had amazing views, I agree with Hamilton’s on the structure of government, who should govern the nation, and what the economics were going to be based on.
Although Thomas Jefferson’s ideas on how the structure of the government should be are excellent, I agree with Alexander Hamilton’s more. Alexander Hamilton pictured the United States’ ideal government like the British, a strong central government. Hamilton wanted to increase the number of government officials, as well as a loose interpretation of the Constitution. By this he meant that if the Constitution did not
…show more content…
I strongly agree with Hamilton’s idea on the balancement of the economy; agriculture, trade, finance, and manufacturing. I agree with Hamilton wanting the economy to be balanced like this because the trade will help form alliances with other countries that we need products from. Hamilton also wanted to give trade, finance, and manufacturing government aid. Giving government aid to trade would make the trades more efficient because the ships would be able to travel further to bring back other products needed as well as give products to other countries.
Although Jefferson had really good points in who should govern, how the government should be structured, and the economy, I still agree with Hamilton the most. How to structure a new nation, who should govern the country, and how to balance the economy are the most important topics for a new found nation. The ideas Hamilton had for an ideal government is how I would create a new government if it was up to

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In 1787, the Continental Congress was brought together in the Philadelphia Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was written and since people had different views on how to interpret it, two political parties were eventually formed: The federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. The main reason for the rise of political parties during the 1790s was because each of the parties favored different political and economical reforms needed as a new, developing country. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and they favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, while Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party favored strict interpretation. The Federalists wanted to create a national economy by creating…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Vipond Mr. Haindfield APUSH 1 November 2017 Unit 6 Reaction Paper In the 1780s and 1790s, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had vastly different ideas on how the economic future would be for the United States. Both of them envisioned a prominent nation, but with both different ideas on how to get there. Despite Jefferson’s view of a future of agricultural economy, which was based on farming, no national bank, and strong state governments; Hamiltons view of an industrial economy, which was based on manufacturing, a national bank, and a strong national government, prospered. The extent in which each of their visions affected the United States were reflected by strikes done in the labor work force, the repeal of the national bank by Andrew Jackson, and the growing number of textiles in the U.S. between 1810 and 1840.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It gave them a chance to start a new form of government without a king. The only problem was Hamilton and Jefferson did not have the same idea of the type of government they wanted to accomplish for their new nation. Hamilton wanted to accomplish a strong central government. He wanted a government that would be able to control the people’s behavior. He understood that “sometimes good people do bad things and bad people do good things”, this gave Hamilton an advantage because Jefferson did not recognize this.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, in “The Hamiltonian Miracle,” Gordon successfully proves that Alexander Hamilton was an economic genius as his brilliant policies significantly helped create the foundation for America’s national…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict adherence to the Constitution, Alexander Hamilton believed that the document was meant to bend when something was deemed necessary for the public good. Even though he previously spoke against it, Jefferson bent the rules of the Constitution for things he thought were right, which proves how it is sometimes vital for the government to tasks outside their explicit powers. Without Hamilton’s view on a loose interpretation on the Constitution, there would be no uniform national currency, as it was not stated in the document. Hamilton advocated for the Constitution, but knew that it was something that was not perfect, so when problems arise strict adherence to it was not entirely…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These ideas formed the Federalist Party, originating in the early 1790s. Hamilton 's views for America were ambitious and power-hungry, and from his fears and hopes, for his country, the Federalist Party was born. One fear of Hamilton 's was the people. He believed that the masses were “turbulent and changing.” (MP 163)…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In American history, few ideological disagreements have been as important as the divide between Alexander Hamilton 's Federalist Party and Thomas Jefferson 's Democrat-Republicans. Both parties were led by brilliant men whose political arguments would lay the foundation for debates on the nature of government in America that are ever present in our national discourse. Hamilton thought America should drive ahead into the future as an industrial and mercantile powerhouse, whereas Thomas Jefferson felt that America 's greatness lied in the "yeoman farmer" and the agrarian traditions he represented. Both sought the best path forward for the young American nation and both would have a chance to put their theories to the test in their capacities as ministers in the Washington Administration…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am persuaded that the Federalist [Hamiltonian] political approach toward governing the young United States had stronger ideas versus the Republican [Jeffersonian] position, which lacked in forward thinking, suppressed free marketing and trade, sought to reduce the national army, and yet supported virtue of the common people. The American Revolution caused high war-debt issues, requiring immediate and effective attention, which in my opinion demanded a strong centralized government. Hamilton’s group, the Federalists, were made up of mostly educated bankers, merchants, and manufactures with some wealthy plantation owners interested in securing the future of the Union by force of “big government”. They believed that government control should be in the hands of the elite and wealthy, that there should be a National Bank, and the establishment of public credit, saying it was authorized by the constitution as “necessary and proper”. Hamilton wrote, “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men the great difficulty lies in this:…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which ultimately led to the formation of America’s first political parties. Alexander Hamilton strongly accepted the need for a powerful central government. Hamilton was an officer in the American army during the American Revolution, which he had seen first-hand the creation of a forceless central authority.…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Legacy: The Seed in a Garden “There is a certain enthusiasm in liberty, that makes human nature rise above itself, in acts of bravery and heroism.” (Hamilton). Known as a bastard orphan, Hamilton was born and raised on an island named Nevis in the British West Indies on January 11, 1757. With a mother who died, father who vanished, and a cousin who had committed suicide, Hamilton was left alone. At the age of 14, he started working for a trading charter which imported and exported goods to and from America.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander Hamilton once said, “When the sword is once drawn, the passions of men observe no bounds of moderation.” Hamilton, an orphan immigrant, wrote his way out of poverty and into the nation’s spotlight. Appointed by George Washington to be the first Secretary of Treasury, Hamilton recognized no qualms or boundaries when it came to fighting for what he believed was right. Although faced with an impossible economic situation, Alexander Hamilton utilized his passion, relentlessness, and rigor, to lay the bedrock for a strong national economy with a three-part plan. After the Revolutionary War and a failed government under the Articles of Confederation, the Unites States was given a fresh start for a strong and centralized government.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without Hamilton’s dedication to improving America’s economy and strengthening the foundations of the country, the U.S. might not be the same as it is…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shortly after the ratification of the Constitution, George Washington unanimously won the presidential election of 1789. Striving towards a nation of unity, Washington set up a cabinet of four strong individuals in order to inaugurate a system of both balance and credibility. Although Washington was strongly against political parties, it wasn’t long until they began to emerge. Filling the cabinet with tension, Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, and Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State, brought upon new challenges for American politics in the eighteenth century, when they brought two very incompatible visions of what they hoped America’s future would look like to the plate. Additionally, their political and economic differences greatly…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During the early, immature years of our nation’s history, the interests of north and south, rich and poor, and industry and agriculture were dealt with as compromises, upsetting both sides until two deeply different visions for the country arose. Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton believed that our new country’s federal government should be more powerful. However, Hamilton 's views faced strong opposition by many, such as Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson and House Representative James Madison. He believed it more wise to provide more power to individual states. The two emerging parties deemed themselves with names that reflected their most treasured values.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two men who wanted change in the political party system. This is where the two new political parties were created, the Federalist party and the Democratic-Republicans. These two new forms of government brought new and different ideas on how to run a federal government. Most candidates of today still follow these ways of thinking, but their ideals are much less extreme, but also these ideas could be applied to some of the problems of today. Alexander Hamilton started his political career as an advisor to Washington during his presidency.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays