Alexander Hamilton Federalist No. 1 Essay

Improved Essays
Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 1 argues for the ratification of the Constitution in the state of New York through the suspension of self-interests and dangerous ambitions. The future of the newborn nation rested on the formation of its government already gravely insufficient and bound to fail under the direction of the Articles of Confederation. Hamilton expressed the purpose of his discussion in the Federalist Papers declaring, “The utility of the union to your political prosperity The insufficiency of the present Confederation to preserve that Union….The conformity of the proposed Constitution to the true principles of republican government....The additional security which its adoption will afford to the preservation of that species …show more content…
1 rested on the opportunity found in the proposed Constitution. Hamilton elevated this opportunity to a monumental choice resting on the people. The citizens of the United States were given a chance in history that had never been proposed, a chance to influence the political sphere in the formation of a government based on the social contract theory. “It seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force” (Hamilton). Hamilton wanted a republic which had a strong, central government to unite the nation, along with a Constitution which gave power to the people. By ratifying the constitution, He asserts the ability the people have to shape a nation by choice instead of chance. The ideal opportunity should not be left to fortune, but rather taken as a challenge citizens need to advantage of out of duty to their …show more content…
Human nature inclines itself towards personal gain, yet Hamilton calls the people to pause this tendency in order to ensure the success of the nation. Hamilton states, “Happy will it be if our choice should be directed by a judicious estimate of our true interests, unperplexed and unbiased by considerations not connected with the public good”. He offers a challenge to first discern the truth, and then make conclusions upon the public good which would then parallel the ideals of the Constitution. Hamilton outlines his convictions in Federalist No. 1, even writing, “For nothing can be more evident, to those who are able to take an enlarged view of the subject, than the alternative of an adoption of the new Constitution or a dismemberment of the Union,” stressing the necessity of the ratification of the Constitution in the state of New

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Which ultimately led to the formation of America’s first political parties. Alexander Hamilton strongly accepted the need for a powerful central government. Hamilton was an officer in the American army during the American Revolution, which he had seen first-hand the creation of a forceless central authority.…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Section 8

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "Philadelphia May 25, 1787 fifty five delegates from all states excluding Rhode Island would meet in response to Alexander Hamilton’s summons(Constitution Convention Notes). They had the soul purpose to simply revise the Articles of Confederation,yet it was obvious the articles were in need of much more. The U.S constitution . George Washington was elected chairmen of this party they would slowly resolve the problems in secrecy.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In their book, Washington and Hamilton: the Alliance that Forged America, authors Stephen F. Knott and Tony Williams describe how the unique and “indispensable relationship” between George Washington and Alexander Hamilton became essential to the founding of America. Knott (a professor of national security affairs at the United States Naval War College in Rhode Island) and Williams (the professional development director at the Bill of Rights Institute and program director of the Washington, Jefferson & Madison Institute in Virginia) are both historians who describe the invaluable relationship shared between George Washington and Hamilton. Their book describes how the two men of such diverse backgrounds shared similar ambitions and contemplated a like minded vision for the future of America, despite the heated controversy inflicted by their opponents. While many historians provide detailed accounts of the relationships between the founding fathers, Knott and Williams reveal several…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States of America in the Post-American Revolution was overflowing with joy, fear and cautious optimism. The world had held its breath as it watched thirteen small imperial colonies succeed in defeating the British Empire and wining its long sought after independence. Unfortunately, the defeat of Britain was only the beginning of the woes America would face. It would come down to two prominent political intellectuals of the time, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, to take it upon themselves to heed this danger. Together they sought to persuade their colleagues and the masses through secret and not so secret writings and meetings.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The author of the book A Brilliant Solution, Carol Berkin, a successful American historian that was born in 1942 in Alabama and was awarded the Bancroft Dissertation Award, from her college at Columbia University where she was awarded and an M.A. and a Ph.D. He has written many books In her book, she summarizes the key elements in the creation of our current government and constitution. She goes into detail factoring in people's beliefs and views to help generalize an individual's standpoint on an issue. In the book, Ms. Berkin is trying to argue that the creation of the constitution was not an easy process but was very tedious work. The book A Brilliant Solution is divided into many chapters but its best summarized in the parts starting…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While trying to ratify the constitution two parties were formed, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now the Federalist wanted a strong government with a strong executive branch. Now the Federalist felt that the Constitution was fine just the way it was, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights. The Federalist also believed that only the elite and educated should be eligible to lead the colonies. Alexander Hamilton was a great influence with the Federalist since he believed that they should have a strong National Bank to manage money across state borders.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander Hamilton wanted strict interpretation to the Constitution, it is to be obeyed as how it was written. There could be no other possible way or bend to the rules of what the founding fathers of this country established. Thomas Jefferson however did want there to be a sort of “what if” factor to the Constitution. Jefferson believed in loose interpretation. This thinking would lead to what is called “the elastic clause” in government where in the Constitution, the rules are in set motion, but there are times when it is bended due to a certain situation where something would be considered legal although the Constitution deemed it illegal to begin.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the active form of government in America by 1777, despite not being universally ratified until 1781. During the early years following the Revolutionary War, Hamilton recognized the budding defects in current governmental structure, most notably the fact that the federal government could not wrangle the various State Legislatures to move in unison on a path to preserve the Union and protect America’s newfound liberty. Hamilton could see the writing on the wall, The Articles had created a tenuous relationship between the the States and the National governments. Hamilton’s primary criticism of the Articles was that the system did not provide the necessary amount of power for the federal government to preserve and protect the Union and its interests. The federal government lacked autonomy to take action on issues that impacted multiple states, due to the limited powers of the executive branch and propensity of legislatures to debate actions to exhaustion without taking significant action.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With regard to the contentious attitude towards the new constitution of the United States, a Freeman’s Essay to the People of Connecticut discredits the arguments against the ratification of the new constitution and urges the readers to independently and justly judge the constitution. From the title of the document, the author is clearly pleading to the citizens, specifically of Connecticut, to disregard the eloquently formulated objections by anti-federalists against the constitution and outright denies any validity of these claims. The author’s criticism of the public’s ignorant acceptance of the opinions of influential figures serves to outline a core problem of the ratification of the constitution; the fear that the important values of…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was agreed upon in the Constitution that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Jefferson). By stating this it was absolute that those who were in a position of power are there because the people they over-see. Some of the men behind the support for the Constitution were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. Although the Federalist strongly supported this change there were many disagreements from the Anti-Federalist group. The main argument came from those who believed this new Constitution would strengthen government at the expense of its people and independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays