Essay On Alexander Hamilton Ideas

Superior Essays
Alexander Hamilton Everlasting Ideas
Alexander Hamilton is Federalists who serve under the office of George Washington whose legacy has often misunderstood. He was one of the Founding Fathers of American and helped create the United States legal system. Also, as a Federalist, his ideas were pro-Britain which caused friction between him and the other Founding father. After his death, many of his political collages try to carry his Federalist ideas through their presidency. Although Hamilton ideas were not popular, some of his ideas have helped the United States as a country. Hamilton is credited for his contribution to convincing the colonies to want the Constitution, help fund the U.S Army, and create nation debt for the United States of America.
…show more content…
Hamilton argued in his Publius article that, “If the states are united under one government, there will be but one national civil list to support; if they are divided into several confederacies, there will be as many different national civil lists to be provided for…”(Mary-Jo Kline 186). At the time, the Newspapers helped the colonist of the country get up to date about what was going on in the country. He explains to the colonist in his papers that there will be too much conflict and confusion if there were separate confederacies in each state. Hamilton magnificent writing and persuasion help the government receive the ratification of the majority of the states. Also, Hamilton reminds the citizens that “the entire separation of the States into thirteen unconnected sovereignties is a project too extravagant and too replete with danger to have many advocates” (Kline 186). Even more, Hamilton arguments of union and separations in his papers helped the United States obtain the ratification of the Constitution; which gave the government more power than they had under the Articles of Confederation. Additionally, the constitution protected the rights of the citizen as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    During the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention, it was familiar that Articles of Confederation was successful in the unification of the colonies after the commotion of the American Revolution. Although the AOC was a huge step to the becoming of this nation, it wasn’t sufficient enough to run the newly-independent country. In force, the constitutional Convection didn’t just revise the Articles, but also wrote the Constitution which was drastically and extremely different from the Articles. On November 15th 1777, the founding fathers adopted the Articles of Confederation which established a confederate-style government with a weak central branch.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without Hamilton’s drive to make the convention possible, the United States wouldn’t be where it is today.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While both men served prominent roles in the emergence of a two party system, Alexander Hamilton held a greater impact in molding our nation’s history. George Washington felt that choosing an ambitious man of intelligence was a very important decision when selecting Alexander Hamilton as his Secretary of Treasury. Hamilton believed that the future of America’s economy lay in the hands of those with capital because they were reliable with the government. Envisioning an industrial powered nation, Hamilton favored a strong central government and believed that the only way to economically flourish was through a government-assisted society. To enforce his ideology, Hamilton outlined a plan to Congress that consisted of three pathbreaking reports on public credit, a national bank, and manufactures (America A Concise History 194).…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the active form of government in America by 1777, despite not being universally ratified until 1781. During the early years following the Revolutionary War, Hamilton recognized the budding defects in current governmental structure, most notably the fact that the federal government could not wrangle the various State Legislatures to move in unison on a path to preserve the Union and protect America’s newfound liberty. Hamilton could see the writing on the wall, The Articles had created a tenuous relationship between the the States and the National governments. Hamilton’s primary criticism of the Articles was that the system did not provide the necessary amount of power for the federal government to preserve and protect the Union and its interests. The federal government lacked autonomy to take action on issues that impacted multiple states, due to the limited powers of the executive branch and propensity of legislatures to debate actions to exhaustion without taking significant action.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalist party believed in the constitution and they did not think that The Bill of Rights were necessary; it was led by Hamilton. “Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them.” (The Great Debate 1). In order to support and defend The Constitution, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay had come up with a plan to write a total of 25 essays divided evenly among the three men, this later became 85 essays.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jefferson’s idea of an ideal society was revolved around the common man. (MP 165) He praised the “yeoman farmer” and trusted in their discretion about what America could become. “He felt that urbanization, industrial factories, and financial speculation would serve to rob the common man of his independence and economic freedom.” (MP165) Jefferson feared the opposite of what Hamilton did, he feared the national government gaining power.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, in “The Hamiltonian Miracle,” Gordon successfully proves that Alexander Hamilton was an economic genius as his brilliant policies significantly helped create the foundation for America’s national…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the Revolution came near the end, Americans decided there needed to be a set of laws in place, for the independence that will be gained if they win the war. The first set of rules to be drafted is known as the Articles of Confederation. Seeing that it was America’s first attempt at a government, it is quite obvious that there were many issues with the rules and provisions created, which caused problems in the new nation and stress among political leaders. The Articles of Confederation caused economic, legislative and leadership problems, along with unrest in the Anti-Federalist Party as shown in Documents A, spoken by Melancton Smith and Document B written by Brutus 1.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I do not think Hamilton left out much when making this argument, he made a very good case on how the judiciary branch preserves the Constitution. I would also say that his point was strong, but was not strong enough to mitigate further debates about the matter, with few of our nation’s presidents, including Jefferson and Lincoln, who disagree with Hamilton’s view. This essay clearly relates to several readings that we have covered. While in this essay discussed several aspects of the judiciary branch and argued its place in our government, in Federalist No. 10 and No. 51 several other aspects of how our government should be made would was discussed. They include how federal power would…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were two men who wanted change in the political party system. This is where the two new political parties were created, the Federalist party and the Democratic-Republicans. These two new forms of government brought new and different ideas on how to run a federal government. Most candidates of today still follow these ways of thinking, but their ideals are much less extreme, but also these ideas could be applied to some of the problems of today. Alexander Hamilton started his political career as an advisor to Washington during his presidency.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation’s first flaw is that it did not give congress hardly any power. For a country to run properly and fairly, it needs to have a strong central government. When the government is not given enough power, States start to branch off and try to be…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Confederation Dbq

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the rights of the people were protected by state bills of rights. As Article II of the Confederation states “All states are independent from one another. The state governments will retain all powers that are not specifically given to the national congress”. This reveals that since the states were not united as one, or under a single power of order, the states were not able to maintain order and conflict between each other. Since each state had different laws and obligations, it caused too much chaos, such as “In 1784, Congress sent John Adams as a minster to London to solve these issues, but the English did not consider him a suitable representative” (Page 153).…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It gave them a chance to start a new form of government without a king. The only problem was Hamilton and Jefferson did not have the same idea of the type of government they wanted to accomplish for their new nation. Hamilton wanted to accomplish a strong central government. He wanted a government that would be able to control the people’s behavior. He understood that “sometimes good people do bad things and bad people do good things”, this gave Hamilton an advantage because Jefferson did not recognize this.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is often the case in revolutions that many partnerships who take a lead role in shaping a new society do not continue to work together after their goal is achieved, that is exactly what happened to James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, who had risen to prominent positions within the new nation of America as delegates for their respective state. Both would be each other 's support for fighting for a new and ratified U.S. constitution. Although their partnership falls apart, they are truly America’s most needed partnership. Madison and Hamilton together led the U.S. to create and ratify the U.S. Constitution, which gave people more rights, made everyone more equal, and set the path for a self-governing America. James Madison and Alexander…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays