Alexander: A Military Genius

Improved Essays
In addition to showing kindness to conquered cities, Alexander was a military genius. At the age 18, he was the commander in charge of the battle techniques in the battle of Chaeronea. During the battle, there was a gap in the formation that would have allowed the enemy to attack, but Alexander saw it and quickly went to fill it with the calvary. This quick action helps the Macedonian army win the battle and defeat Greek allied city -states which gave his father Philip II control over most of Athens ( documentary). This would become one of his many military victories. His victories included the battle of Tyre. After the victory at Issus against the Persian king, Alexander processed to Phoenicia and Syria. All the major cities in the land

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As he traveled, he fought in many battles with 5 major battles. He was almost always successful. So, the big question is how great is Alexander The Great?Alexander was great for these reasons; his concern for others, lasting legacy and his remarkable achievements. Alexander was great due to of his concern for others. For example, document C states during the battle of Tyre if you surrendered to him or sought sanctuary at the temple he would not kill you.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Soon after his father's death, alexander took his fathers thrown and was in power and control. He used this opportunity to successfully conquer the Persian empire. he had a very powerful army, and he was known to be a genius for the military force. Alexander also succeeded to colonize the city of tyre.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander the Great brilliantly showcased his ability to strategize in the Battle of Gaugamela. The Battle of Gaugamela was an “extraordinary victory” (Matthews, “Battle of Gaugamela”) against the Persian army. Alexander’s army was composed of an estimated 40,000 to 50,000 soldiers, while his counterpart, Darius III was believed to have “anywhere between 90,000 to 250,000 men” (Wasson, “Battle of Gaugamela”). Outnumbered, Alexander knew he could not face Persian army in their traditional formation.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander used his smartness and quick-thinking skills to win battles in the heat of the moment. Once he was about to cross a river when he saw that Porus, the enemy, was directly across from him and his army, “When Alexander saw this, he [decided to] move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled” (Doc A). In like manner in a game of…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One thing was his determination to conquer the world and didn't give up. He took the Macedonian empire from nothing to something and started to fight. “Alexander then threw his cavalry into a circle around the entire force and ordered the infantry to lock shields, to group tightly and to advance as a phalanx” (Doc.B). Alexander's father King Philip made a phalanx which is when soldiers lock shields and have long spears around then to attack. Like father like son, Alexander used this tactic to defeat Porus’s army and send them running.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander the Great, born as Alexander III of Macedon, was a King of Macedon who was known as one of the most brilliant military generals in history. He created a vast empire stretching throughout Europe and Asia. He lived from 356-325 B.C.E., and during that short time, was able to create a nearly unstoppable military force that never lost a battle while Alexander was alive. The son of Phillip II, he was able to continue his father’s mission to make Macedon into a powerful military and economic force. (Walbank, 2016)…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great was not truly great because he was an inhumane leader and his empire quickly collapsed after he died. Alexander wasn’t truly great because he was inhumane to other people and seemed like a bad general, “Ferocious manhunt…30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified”(Doc C). He obtained 2,000,000 square miles and founded 70 cities(Doc E). However, in nearly every city, Alexander would sell most of the people into slavery and kill the remaining of the people.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Once Alexander III of Macedonia’s father died, he inherited his throne and took over his empire at the age of twenty. Following in his father’s footsteps, he controlled a vast area of land, from Greece to Egypt extending to the Hindu Kush Mountains. Alexander did conquer over 3,000 miles of land, which is absurd, but his ruthless and sadistic manner doesn’t deserve the honoring title of “great”. Alexander was so power hungry, that his actions became deadly. He would pilfer every town and eradicate any obstacle in his quest for victory.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His battle triumphs were, and still are, astounding, and he did not lose a significant battle in all of his campaigns. His most celebrated victory was at the Battle of Gaugamela in 331 BC in what today is Iraq. His leadership was successful in part due to his ability to motivate his soldiers, focus his army on a common enemy, and lead from the front. Hannibal, Julius Caesar, and Napoleon all studied his military methods and widely acknowledged that they would have never had reached the heights they did without Alexander’s experience to draw from.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Furthermore, Alexander’s failure to produce an heir resulted in the complete collapse of his of his empire. As seen in 335, after the effective conclusion of the Greek revolt Diodorus quotes the advise of Parmenion and Antipater to Alexander insisting for him not to become vigorously involved in the Asian campaign until he had produced a son for heir. Alexander opposed these beliefs, disregarding the idea due to the principle that it would take up too much time. Hence the aftermath of his death in 323, the eclipse of Macedonian power, and the ensuing decades of bloody warfare between his successors down to around 301 as a result of his arrogance to produce an heir. While people may justify this point saying that he could not predict his death…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great is considered the Greatest, because he has never been defeated in a battle. Alexander is still considered one of the most successful military leaders in history. Even though Alexander the Great is a legend, he still has ton of accomplishments and the impact after his death. When Alexanders father was assassinated during the invasion on the Persian empire that’s when he became king Alexander. Further more into the next paragraph we will be talking about how Alexander made all of those accomplishments, There are so many things that Alexander the Great has accomplished and one of them is when Alexander was the king of Macedonia and how he conquered an empire that was from Balkans to modern–Pakistan.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There is nothing impossible to him who will try -Alexander the Great The impossible can't be done without trying. That’s how it has worked for thousands of years. Effort is very important this world of ours without it we wouldn't be where we are now. Think of all the early explorers that tried and tried again to find new passageways.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander believed very much in following his father’s path in conquering the Persians. Both he and Darius had great battle strategies and preparations for the Battle of Gaugamela. Alexander had many skilled strategies to battle previous to Gaugamela (History.com). Darius carefully chose Gaugamela for the next battle site (Wasson). Gaugamela was a wide plain for Darius to use his chariots, elephants, many men, and could place obstacles and traps in the field (Wasson; Hickman).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was very important in Western Civilization, he conquered more land than any other king in this time. His reign as the King of Macedonia was important because he was able to lay down the foundations for the Hellenistic era. Alexander was the son of Phillip of Macedonia and king of Macedonia. His father, who had died wanted revenge on Persia and Alexander continued with his father’s plan to seek revenge against the Persians. Alexander on the other hand wanted total conquest, he had a dream of one world.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays