Aldf's Argument For Animal Rights

Improved Essays
Animal rights is a topic that has been all over the news lately and has raised many questions which makes it a controversial topic. Many argue that animals should not obtain rights as humans. However, animals must acquire a Bill of Rights since they are treated inhumanly and have similar traits as humans.
Accordingly, the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) claims that animals have the right to earn rights just like any other living creature. The ALDF argues that animals are defenseless against abuse caused by humans. They are underprivileged of protection humans are ought to supply. According to the ALDF, “Deprived of legal protection”. The essence of ALDF’s argument is that animals dispossess constitutional safety. I agree that animals are
…show more content…
The ALDF’s petition claims “The right of animals to be free from exploitation, cruelty, neglect, and abuse”. This abuse and mistreatment is causing animals to be upset. ALDF’s theory that animals are getting injured by humans is useful since it sheds insight on the difficult problems animals are facing including chemicals. Scientists are using animals to test makeup for human use. All these toxic chemicals animals are exposed to are causing tragic skin problems including allergies and cancer which are painful. Even though i agree that animal testing is for human good, i still believe the animals do need rights to prevent these tragic results. Of course many people might probably disagree with this assertion but recent research has demonstrated various situations where animals were subjected to emotional situations that made animals show their ability to feel empathy. According to Jeremy Rifkin in this article “A Change of Heart about Animals”, pigs can crave affection if they are denied their playtime (Rifkin 33). They can even experience depression if they are isolated for a long time. In addition,the government in Germany is encouraging farmers to give pigs 20 seconds of human contact each day and provide them with toys (Rifkin 33). Also, when elephants lose a loved one, they experience grief. Elephants stand over their kin for days and even touch the dead body with their trunks (Rifkin 34). All these studies and many more indicate that animals show empathy toward themselves and others and determine their similarity with humans and this similarity must be accounted for or else it would be like torturing other

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Animal welfare is how well the animals should be treated. Michael C. Appleby explains animal welfare as, “Ethical concern over the quality of life of animals” (19). If one believes in animal welfare then does one believe in animal rights also? Animals get mistreated in different settings whether circuses, zoos or factories. According to the “Animal Rights Debate” Rich…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Act Essay

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People fight for the propositions of laws so it can benefit animals and at least tolerate the circumstances the animals have been put into. Some protest in peaceful acts in a way to get the media to have a broad source for recruitment to fight for the cause getting the attention from those who cause the cruelty to animals. An idea that emerged that Smith talked about, was we faced the idea of “Anthropomorphism” that animals are aware what is happening and the animals are smart enough to know what is going on and contribute emotions of what they are going through (Smith pg.8). That cause guilt to workers or anyone who caused an animal physical pain causing organizations to stand up for animals incapable protecting themselves. People…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Should animals). It is said that animal researchers treat animals humanely, both for the animals sake and for reliable test results. However, the cons are still pretty big. Most think that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Also, it is said that animals are very different than humans and make poor test subjects.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, animals do not exhibit human diseases such as HIV, Alzheimer's disease and many more. Therefore, it sounds useless to think that testing drugs to these diseases using animals will give accurate results (Slattery & Cryan, 2012). Apart from this, using these animals as test subjects also greatly violates the animal rights, because animals just like humans have feelings and deserve to be treated right. However, if not for the use of these animals, the medicine world would be stagnant. However, the use of animals as testing subjects should be banned, because it greatly invades animals’ rights and puts the animals through a lot of pain and suffering.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even humans, on a biological level, are animals themselves. With that being stated, the main argument boils down ethics, with each and every person’s morals playing an important part. I, personally, am against animal abuse, so consequently I believe that this issue should be addressed more firmly by people, by the law, and by the world. I, as a pet owner think that animal cruelty is one of the most wicked things in the world. People with good intentions but ultimately neglect and abuse animals, I am more lenient to, because people who fall under this category generally cannot help the situation they are in, or just ignorant on the issue.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fox, an ethical philosopher, “Animals do not have ‘rights’ equivalent to humans due to their exclusion from the human ‘moral community’” (Baier 137-138). This “community” includes having a sense of time, being able to make decisions and having a sense of self-awareness (Baier 138). Therefore, testing on animals is more ethical than on humans, based on their inferior status. On the other hand, Peter Singer is against animal testing on the basis that animals do feel an extraordinary amount of pain and should have as many rights as humans. Animals should have equal rights just like…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The major negative effect of animal testing is that it's seen as cruel and inhumane. The article “About Animal Testing” written by the Humane Society International states: “Animals are forced chemical exposure in toxicity testing, which can include oral force-feeding, forced inhalation, skin or injection into the abdomen, muscle, etc.” (HSI 1). Many of these animals will die due to the method of which they perform this tests. Another con maybe how animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A specific community may decide that the animals they use for many purposes including food and fur among others do not have rights, which leaves them vulnerable. On the other hand, a community that decides to protect animals rights may choose to define tough measures against those that violate those rights. Without a doubt, this theory is consequential in the sense that it prompts the conversation on animal rights, by asking people to consider animals as beings with feelings. Ultimately, what happens to animals will depend on the beliefs of a specific society since the majority will follow whatever society passes as…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Gluck appeals to his readers’ emotions and morals in “Second Thoughts of an Animal Researcher”. Through personal experience he realized that animals have their own personalities and unique qualities. Gluck also brings logic into the equation when he pointed out that animals have very similar pain receptors to humans. In “Animal Research is Wasteful and Misleading”, Barnard and Kaufman also use logic to persuade against animal experimentation. Data shows that testing on animals is not effective.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal Experimentation Animal Experimentation has been a problem and it still remains being one of the biggest problems. Most people agree that animal experimentation should be banned but there is no agreement of what the outcome would be. Although, there are other ways of getting results without testing on animals which are, human tissue, drug trials, genetic testing, etc. Other people think animal testing is the best way because some animals have an organism as a human like traits such as mice, rats, cats, monkeys, pigs etc. Sometimes testing on an animal does not completely match with a human body reaction towards the outcome of the research from an animal.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays