Aldf's Argument For Animal Rights

Improved Essays
Animal rights is a topic that has been all over the news lately and has raised many questions which makes it a controversial topic. Many argue that animals should not obtain rights as humans. However, animals must acquire a Bill of Rights since they are treated inhumanly and have similar traits as humans.
Accordingly, the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) claims that animals have the right to earn rights just like any other living creature. The ALDF argues that animals are defenseless against abuse caused by humans. They are underprivileged of protection humans are ought to supply. According to the ALDF, “Deprived of legal protection”. The essence of ALDF’s argument is that animals dispossess constitutional safety. I agree that animals are
…show more content…
The ALDF’s petition claims “The right of animals to be free from exploitation, cruelty, neglect, and abuse”. This abuse and mistreatment is causing animals to be upset. ALDF’s theory that animals are getting injured by humans is useful since it sheds insight on the difficult problems animals are facing including chemicals. Scientists are using animals to test makeup for human use. All these toxic chemicals animals are exposed to are causing tragic skin problems including allergies and cancer which are painful. Even though i agree that animal testing is for human good, i still believe the animals do need rights to prevent these tragic results. Of course many people might probably disagree with this assertion but recent research has demonstrated various situations where animals were subjected to emotional situations that made animals show their ability to feel empathy. According to Jeremy Rifkin in this article “A Change of Heart about Animals”, pigs can crave affection if they are denied their playtime (Rifkin 33). They can even experience depression if they are isolated for a long time. In addition,the government in Germany is encouraging farmers to give pigs 20 seconds of human contact each day and provide them with toys (Rifkin 33). Also, when elephants lose a loved one, they experience grief. Elephants stand over their kin for days and even touch the dead body with their trunks (Rifkin 34). All these studies and many more indicate that animals show empathy toward themselves and others and determine their similarity with humans and this similarity must be accounted for or else it would be like torturing other

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Ought animals have rights, or ought they fall under the category of being morally considerable? I argue that there is no single framework in which to address the moral treatment of animals. A careful blend of these two ideas, moral rights and…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Online links are provided in order to prove the credibility of the image. At the top of the image, there is a link to the agency that created the image called Freedom for Animals. The audience is able to learn more about the organization and what they have done in terms of cosmetic testing on animals and animal rights. At the bottom of the image, another link is also provided in order to give the audience more information and to do their own research regarding animal testing. The creation of this piece makes a statement that animals are not able to defend themselves the organization is their…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights”, author Abby Hearne states that the current animal rights movement is “built upon a misconceived premise that rights were created to prevent us from unnecessary suffering.” This mixed with the misunderstanding of animal happiness and what it really means. This paper is written for people who are supporters of the current animal rights movement. The author Abby Hearne’s main argument in this essay is that our definition of animal rights is fundamentally wrong.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no doubting the fact that animals do not have rights in the conventional sense, or in any other sense for that matter. The reason is because they are not moral agents; they cannot do things out of a sense of right or wrong and cannot reason, as opposed to humans. Without reasoning, they are unable to have rights and therefore, are not responsible. Does that mean humans have the right to treat animals badly? Of course not; but that is for humans to decide, because animals cannot decide anything.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals are also used for a range of clothing and food. In 2014, ‘the end cruel cosmetics’ bill was passed within Australia in an attempt to put an end to animal testing. This, however, is still only one country amid the world that is headed for change. There are numerous reports with appalling statistics…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believe an animal should be treated just like a human. This group is called Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC). The authors thesis is, “But more research and testing are needed and much of it must be done on animals. But will it occur? Not if the animal "rights" terrorists plaguing Huntingdon Life Sciences have their way (Epstein and Brook)”.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We as humans should also speak up for those who cannot. The Animal Legal Defense has sponsored a petition that states the following: “Deprived of legal protection, animals are defenseless against exploitation and abuse by humans. Through the animal Bill of Rights, the Animal Legal Defense Fund is working to show congress a groundswell of support for legislation that protects animals and recognizes that like all sentient beings, animals are entitled to basic legal rights in our society.” Society has always grown and changed to become more modernized; this Animal Bill of…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal rights activists have gained considerable attention in the past few decades through education of the public. The exposure of animal cruelty has led more people to support the need for animal rights. The question now is not whether or not animals deserve rights. Instead, the question is what should those rights be and how far should they extend. A key factor that determines what rights an individual deserves is dignity.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Opening Statement All around the world on a daily basis animals are being harmed because of humans. We are forcing these animals to suffer for our entertainment, experimental, and food purposes. Many animals are subjected to harsh treatment. The experimental division in animals uses them to their advantage. While innocent animals are used on tv and in bull fights for entertainment.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal cruelty has always been a challenge that gets overlooked by society in the food market. Many people do not take into consideration the life of the cow, chicken, or pig, and lots of other animals, while enjoying their juicy hamburger, chicken leg, and bacon. “An Animal’s Place” by Michael Pollan argues about animal liberation while using support from Peter Singer’s “Animal Liberation” book. Peter Singer is pro animal rights and has converted lots and outs of people over to vegetarianism, while Michael Pollan loves steak and seeks to see if Singer could convert him as well. Our world changes consistently with the trends of our society, from the civil rights movements of blacks and women, to the legalization of gay marriage.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Animal rights is the idea in which all animals have the right to their life and their most basic interest, like avoiding pain and suffering. Animal rights movements started in the west, the first public victory for animal rights activist was the Britain's Treatment of Cattle Act or The Martin’s Act, which prevents improper treatment towards…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Animals are not ours to eat. Animals are not ours to wear. Animals are not ours to experiment on. Animals are not ours to use for entertainment. Animals are not ours to abuse in any way.”…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal Rights Should animals have rights? If so, should these rights be comparable to those given to humans? Animal Rights are rights believed to be owed to animals in order for them to live full lives, free from suffering. Animals are currently being used, and in some cases abused, in medical research, clothing industries, hunting for sport, food, and population control, and countless other services to humans. As is the case with all ethical issues, there are two defined perspectives and supporters of the current and future treatment given and due to animals.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Rights For Decades the American society as well as many others, have been participants in an ongoing controversy regarding animal rights and animal protection. This particular debate has raised so much havoc in the world today, considering activist for animal rights are very passionate and will not stop on the account of politeness to get a point across. A widely known animal rights group established in 1980, known as Peta are famous for throwing buckets of wet paint on a various victims wearing a fur piece of clothing to prove a point. Being an activist for animal rights opposed to being a non-activist has not only become two different beliefs, but two opposite lifestyles as well.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays