In the last stanza, canine individuals say their animosity toward feline individuals is on account of they "cherish excessively, are flighty,/are variable, wed an excess of wives,/desert their kids, cool all at supper tables/with stories of their nine lives". The second stanza, then again, foresees a more profound, darker truth: interest is unsafe to existing conditions. Inquisitive individuals "doubt what is constantly said"; they look past "what appears" to be, to what something really is in actuality; they "ask odd inquiries, meddle in dreams, leave home, smell rats, have hunches."
In his last examination, the creator argues his case to let the feline individuals be who they are. "Give them a chance to," he says, "be nine-lived and conflicting, sufficiently inquisitive to change." Why? Since the "feline individual" is a "minority of one" who can be "depended on to come clean". In the event that he appears to be flighty, it is on account of he is willing to fall flat. He gathers truth by being willing to commit errors, to fall flat and fizzle and come up short once more, to persevere through the agony, to experience the demise, and return from hellfire again and