Alabama Second Congressional District Description Essay

Improved Essays
I represent Alabama’s Second Congressional District, a predominantly Republican district where federalism, additional legislation, a bicameral legislature, and the Electoral College are vital to success. Covering the southeast corner of the state, Alabama’s Second Congressional District is a region marked by diversity. From large cities and major military installations to sprawling farmland and small towns, there are a variety of economic and social interests at play. Home to Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base and Fort Rucker, this region is predominantly known for its defense facilities. As the largest employers in the district, these military installations are a great boon as they infuse money into the local economy. Large metropolises such as Montgomery and Dothan are found here and provide jobs primarily in government and in the trade, transport, and warehousing industry. In contrast to these large cities are thousands of acres of fertile farmland where approximately half of the peanuts grown in the United States are cultivated. It is clear to see that this district has a lot to offer and is a true asset to the United States. …show more content…
The constituents generally believe in the sanctity of life, smaller government, lower taxes, the Second Amendment, more states rights, and a balanced budget (Roby).
Federalism is vital to protect the rights and interests of Alabama’s Second Congressional District, diverse interests that would not be properly represented under a single national

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Should powers like these rest in the hands of the federal government or does it belong to the states? According to Larson, “fearing consolidation at the hands of distant elites, or jealous of local advantages, most congressmen refused to vest that authority [for a national system of internal improvements] in the president or any other agents who might injure their interests at home.” (384) Adam only feeds into this fear of a strong federal…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Arguments: Congress desired to have all states have…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carmelo Figueroa Per. 4 November 2, 2017 How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? Tyranny is one of the reasons that governments have gone to anarchy; People have rebelled and started riots or even wars due to the oppression of tyranny. The founding fathers of America wanted a government that was strong, but not too strong.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is clear that the framers of the Alabama 1901 Constitution had one goal, to silence their opponents. They used poll taxes, literacy tests, grandfather clauses and other forms of disenfranchisement. Not only are they responsible for disenfranchisement but also they are responsible for centralization of political power. Alabama after the ratification the 1901 constitution lacks home rule, amends a surplus of amendments that only affect specific counties, and weakens local democracy.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Americans’ rights and liberties are overtly expressed through the Bill of Rights. Federalists and Republicans possessed contradicting views of the same document, fueling debate. Key Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton intelligently reformed the American economy, eliminating the national debt. The Federalist Papers strategically expressed the movement’s motivations and ideals, thus bolstering support. More than 200 years later, the Federalist-Antifederalist debate comprised of the same key issues that face our nation…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution guards against tyranny by utilizing all three branches to keep each other in check. Each branch of government is separate, which allows them to not abuse their power and take advantage of people. Small and large states need to have one representative, as well as two senators. The three branches of government have prevented tyranny for a long time.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the Great Compromise American leaders had to decide what plan of action they should take when improving America’s weak government. State representation was a major controversy between the north and the south. In my personal opinion, I think that states should have a proportional representation in Congress according to its population also stated in the Virginia plan. The reasoning behind my conclusion is that, yes, some states are larger than others and may be split in opinion.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This pleased the larger states that had larger populations that felt that they had more say in political terms since they were bigger. Where the Senate would have an equal amount of representatives from every state no matter what the size of the population was. This made the smaller states happy. With each state agreeing this helped the process of drafting the Constitution. So in the end Roger Sherman’s plan worked for every state.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalists’ attempt to stifle the volatile passions of the public in the federal institutions is an example which will no doubt soon find its way into states, counties, and townships. The constitutional doctrine of placing faith in structures rather than people will result in a mass erosion of citizens’ power. Tocqueville explains this saying, “left to themselves, the institutions of the township can scarcely struggle against an enterprising and strong government…it is easy to destroy it” (Tocqueville, 56). But while the constitutional system makes for good government it does not make for good citizens. Had the Federalists kept the people “strong and independent, they fear partitioning social power and exposing the state to anarchy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are also provisions to decentralize the state government due to the reconstruction after the Davis administration (Ericson and…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Carson gives an in-depth perspective on why such a large portion of the first representatives stressed the importance of a strong state government. As someone who would consider themselves a Republican, I believe in small government, but why? I just always thought, “Well, too big of a federal government can lead to more corruption” but, as I’ve discovered from this book, it is so much more than that. To explain the importance of state government, Carson uses the example of a judge. We are more likely to ensure justice if the majority of problems are dealt with locally.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Expansion DBQ

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One side felt Texas could “increase the wealth and happiness of all classes in our society” (Doc G) and believed “all this patriotism ¬-all this philanthropy -all this religion- appeals to us in favor of the addition of Texas to our Union” (Doc G). On the other hand, the opponents knew that “we are anxious to force free government on all” (Doc H) but only under “a very high state of moral and intellectual improvement, in a civilized state” (Doc H) is the nation able maintain a free government and form “a constitution capable of endurance” (Doc H).…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ever since America was founded, its population has always struggled with the balance between national and local politics. A national government was favored because of its ability to maintain cohesiveness among the whole population, while local, smaller governments were favored in order to limit the powers of the national government and to prevent the tyranny the colonists faced before fleeing from Britain. While some Americans argue that states’ rights hold more importance over the power of the federal government, an “overall trend in American history shows the increase of dominance of local over national politics.” The dominance of the federal government is beneficial for American society because it is more efficient, more democratic, and…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How California’s Government Differs from the Federal Government Each state has its own government that govern the people living in that particular state. The State’s government makes ballot initiatives etc. to help the maintain a democracy in the state. The Federal government, on the other hand, makes laws, treaties etc.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays