Al Quade Pros And Cons

Superior Essays
material support. Finally, under this statute Congress made the decision to target anyone in the chain of causation. the key term here is support the government is criminalizing anyone that provides support to terrorist foreign terrorist organization.) passed the “Material Support Statute.” Congress decided that anyone involved in the chain of causation of terrorism will be targeted by the U.S. It clear that U.S. Citizen was involved in the chain of causation of terrorism targeting the U.S. The Material Support to terrorist require a specific intent element to further the terrorist activity the government must prove this intent. Anyone that knowingly provides Material Support to a terrorist can be criminalized under this statute. Criminalizing material support to a foreign terrorist organization. Al-Quade has been designated by the secretary of state to recognized as a foreign terrorist organization. (9:01)
Issue:
Whether the President can try by military commission? And what are the issues that arises when trying in
…show more content…
Moussaoui
Issue: When the government asserts an evidentiary privilege in a criminal prosecution, may the court order the prosecution to choose between disclosing the information or having the indictment dismissed?
Rule:
When the government asserts an evidentiary privilege in a criminal prosecution, the court may order the prosecution to choose between disclosing the information or having the indictment dismissed.

1. Is the classified information Procedures Act (CIPA) which governs discovery criminal defendants have a right to receive certain information such as the information that the prosecution is using against the defendant. And anything else that might be relevant to them putting on a defense. This is a constitutional right that criminal defendants have.
Need: government wants to use confidential information to prosecute; Defendant has constitutional rights to see evidence; Defendant may have confidential

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ireland V Brady Summary

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At first it was denied by the trial court but was later reversed by the court of appeals stating that a new trial was allowed since they jury may have given a different verdict had they known this information. Issue: If a prosecutor fails to give information to the defense, is this depriving a defendant to their right to a fair trial if the prosecution withheld evidence requested or information that contained a testimony that was…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agurs, the Supreme Court had expanded the rule by recognizing a duty to disclose exculpatory information even in the absence of a specific request for it, and the prosecutor failed to disclose this information that violated the defendants due process clause. In this case the female defendant testified self-defense with the stabling of her male acquaintance in a hotel room. She was then convicted of second degree murder. After the conviction of her trail the defendant had learned that the prosecutor failed to disclose this information at the trial of the victim (male acquaintance) having guilty pleas to assault and weapons possession charges. The prosecution failed to mention to the court and jury of the victims’ previous criminal background in the trial (Judge,…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal has the privilege to have a sensible safeguard set for the wrongdoing he or she perpetrated and as indicated by the genuine flight hazard which he or she may force. In 1963 a man known as Ernesto Arturo Miranda was captured of charges he actually admited nightfall of interrigation, and was sentenced, and sentenced 20-30 years. Miranda's court apointed lawyer contended taht he was not educated he has a privilege to insight, and his admission was not volontary. The Arizona Incomparable Court ruled upon this case, and announced that Miranda was unconscious of the rights allowed under the fifth amendent's self implication provision, and the sixth alterations right to a lawyer.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a 5-4 decision the U.S. Supreme Court requires criminal suspects to invoke their right to remain silent with a statement. If a suspect remains silent or won't cooperate during a interrogation session, this is no longer enough to stop any further questioning by law enforcement officials. Warden vs Thompkins is a case that shows “how the provisions of Miranda have been chiped away at” Warden vs Thompkins involved the case of Van Chester Thompkins, who was arrested and charged with first-degree murder. Thompkins was read his Miranda rights, and given an form that he wouldn't sign. After remaining silent for three hours, an officer asked, "Do you believe in God?" and "Do you pray to God to forgive you for shooting that boy down Thompkins answered…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will address the extensive debate regarding presidential powers and the fact that, though unwise and poor law, the War Powers Resolution is not unconstitutional. In order to determine whether or not the War Powers Resolution intrudes too deeply on standing presidential power, it is first necessary to identify the legitimate executive prerogative that the Congress may have infringed upon. Opponents of the War Powers Resolution make a serious argument on intrusiveness regarding only one executive prerogative, the President's power as "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States”, which is said…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once a state has created a law and it has been determined to be constitutional, the enforcement process lends itself to judicial scrutiny when brought before the court. When the process of enforcement and the discovery of evidence have been put into motion, the circumstance surrounding how law enforcement came into contact with the accused is one of the first things reviewed - much of the initial interaction is based on the enforcement of State laws, which cascades into protected rights when the enforcement effort starts, or elements of a crime have been discovered. Since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applies the Federal Government, and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause makes the Bill of Rights applicable…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The right to remain silent is located in Fifth Amendment, and the right to have a presence of attorney is located in the Sixth Amendment of the constitution. The Supreme Court ended up ruling that it was unconstitutional to undertake the interrogation without the warning of the rights secured by the Fifth Amendment. Additionally, the court stated that they must protect the individual from the desire to self-incriminate ("Miranda v."). The court created the Miranda Warning which is as follows: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The matter of contention present with respect to the disclosure of evidence is conspicuous when considering the notion of full disclosure itself. The concept of fully sharing evidence…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Segura V. Williams 1984

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Even if appellant had been subject to an illegal arrest, he would not be entitled to the suppression of the evidence because the police station arrest had not been the fruit of the bicycle detention. The court held that when the connection between illegal police conduct and the discovery and seizure of evidence is so attenuated as to dissipate the taint, the evidence will not be excluded. Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796, 805 (1984). In 1984, the Court first recognized the inevitable discovery doctrine as an exception to the exclusionary rule in Nix v. Williams and held that if the prosecution can establish that evidence unlawfully seized would have been discovered by lawful means, the exclusionary rule does not apply and the evidence is still admissible.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facts: In the case of Miranda v. Arizona , the court’s decision affected four different cases that pertained to the same issue. There were four cases regarding the defendant 's Fifth Amendment rights were violated these cases were Miranda v. Arizona , Vignera v. New York, and Westover v. United States, and California v. Stewart .Of the four cases, three of them had the same issue in that the defendants were arrested and questioned for a crime that led them to confess. However, none of the defendants were aware or told of their 5th amendment right to remain silent until you are given an attorney during questioning. Since they confessed to the crime, the courts convicted, each of the defendants.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    My Cousin Vinny Analysis

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Koral Zazueta PSCI 231 Prompt 1 Court Proceedings in My Cousin Vinny The film My Cousin Vinny is a relatively accurate representation of criminal court proceedings. However, the jury selection process was not explicitly shown in the film. Furthermore, the film does not emphasize much of the pre-trial motions, the preponderance of evidence, or how the evidence was collected. The process of discovering relevant facts concerning the case was also deemphasized.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction The sixth amendment is a section in the Bill of Rights that guarantees a citizen a speedy trail, a fair jury and an attorney if the accused person wants one and a chance to confront the witness who is accusing the defendant of the crime meaning he or she can see who is making the accusations. The right to public and speedy trails means that a citizen has the right to be informed of the charges, call and confront the witness, tried to the impartial jury and right to an attorney. For instance if we get a ticket for speeding or littering, we get informed by a letter or any other source. The intention is that the government cannot just say that we did it, they give us a chance to ascertain our innocence.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sixth Amendment Rights

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The right to counsel is something that a defendant should be allowed as our Sixth Amendment right states. Having this right, give the defendant their own choice as to who can represent them, when they are paying for it on their own accord. The Sixth Amendment rights state, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. ”(Book).…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research Paper The importance of Amendment VI getting signed into the Constitution was crucial for future growth of America 's justice system. James Madison put the Amendment VI into the Bill of Rights. Amendment VI has many protections to the one person accused of a crime, such as Public Trial Guarantee, Right to be informed of criminal charges, and Right to be confronted by adverse witnesses. However, the right to a speedy trial is considered the most important in the constitution, because criminal defendants could be held accountable under a unproven accusations.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The People vs. Larry Flynt Americans value their freedom, most especially their freedom of speech and how their Constitution protects such freedom. Speeches like hate speech, speech plus, symbolic speech, seditious speech and the like are part of their freedom of speech. For the purposes of this paper, the film to be discussed is The People vs. Larry Flynt. This paper will also discuss the interrelationship between media, identities, and politics depicted in the said movie. Brief Summary of the Film…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays