The Al Gore’s Nobel peace prize speech story is much better than the video because of many reasons like for example you can picture everything in your mind. People wonder why read the speech and not just take your time reading the speech again and understand everything and not just listening to Al Gore talk without understanding everything he is talking about. Now I will explain why and how the story is better than the video.
In Al Gore’s speech he says many large words that many people don't understand and so in the story you can search up what the words mean and understand the story much better. My classroom took at least an hour reading the story, but we got the point of it and figured out what Al Gore was trying to tell the people listening to him. Al Gore took only 20 minutes and didn't explain what he was talking about. An example is in paragraph 16-27 Al Gore used big words in just a couple minutes. This is one reason why the story was better than the video. …show more content…
Like when he was talking about the environmental problems we have going on we can picture animals going extinct, habitats getting destroyed, and even us humans hurting our beloved Earth. In the video we don't have time to picture all of this because Al Gore is talking about this all way too quickly! One example is when he talked about how we might have a permanent “Carbon Summer” because of all the pollution we have been sending into the air from our factories and other things like that. This shows that picturing what's going on in the speech is better than not doing so in the
In Al Gore’s speech he says many large words that many people don't understand and so in the story you can search up what the words mean and understand the story much better. My classroom took at least an hour reading the story, but we got the point of it and figured out what Al Gore was trying to tell the people listening to him. Al Gore took only 20 minutes and didn't explain what he was talking about. An example is in paragraph 16-27 Al Gore used big words in just a couple minutes. This is one reason why the story was better than the video. …show more content…
Like when he was talking about the environmental problems we have going on we can picture animals going extinct, habitats getting destroyed, and even us humans hurting our beloved Earth. In the video we don't have time to picture all of this because Al Gore is talking about this all way too quickly! One example is when he talked about how we might have a permanent “Carbon Summer” because of all the pollution we have been sending into the air from our factories and other things like that. This shows that picturing what's going on in the speech is better than not doing so in the