As stated by US diplomat Henry Kissinger, “The conventional army loses if it does not win. The guerrilla wins if he does not lose.” The strategic aim of al-Barnawi, once gaining rapport with local leaders and improving his troops’ competency, would do well to consolidate his position in the Sambisa Forest in which Boko Haram is presently confined. The forest, already heavily mined, could become the Nigerian army’s Vietnam War; by booby trapping, mining and otherwise sabotaging roads and trails towards insurgent held positions, the guerrillas would cripple and demoralize future inlays into the forest. Creating a defence-in-depth system of trenches in the deeper woods would further discourage the army from marching where they are not welcome. By lightly manning the forward trenches and feigning retreat, encouraged coalition forces could be lured deeper into the woods and slaughtered by further booby traps and awaiting militants. This sort of discouraging strategy would make even the most ambitious Nigerian officer think twice about barreling into enemy territory without vastly superior forces; at which point, the insurgents could simply retreat from their camps, allowing their foe to waste their resources on largescale probes into the heavily mined and sabotaged forest. The Nigerian and coalition forces would be forced to adopt a passive defence on the outskirts of the forest, rendered unable to advance due to attritional and morale damages. It is important to note that, in news articles published in November 2016, that the Nigerian Navy is currently deploying sailors to the region in order to supplement the Army and deploy gunboats onto Lake Chad; with the government being forced to deploy it’s navy onto dry land speaks to the desperation in which the Nigerian government seeks to quickly and decisively end the
As stated by US diplomat Henry Kissinger, “The conventional army loses if it does not win. The guerrilla wins if he does not lose.” The strategic aim of al-Barnawi, once gaining rapport with local leaders and improving his troops’ competency, would do well to consolidate his position in the Sambisa Forest in which Boko Haram is presently confined. The forest, already heavily mined, could become the Nigerian army’s Vietnam War; by booby trapping, mining and otherwise sabotaging roads and trails towards insurgent held positions, the guerrillas would cripple and demoralize future inlays into the forest. Creating a defence-in-depth system of trenches in the deeper woods would further discourage the army from marching where they are not welcome. By lightly manning the forward trenches and feigning retreat, encouraged coalition forces could be lured deeper into the woods and slaughtered by further booby traps and awaiting militants. This sort of discouraging strategy would make even the most ambitious Nigerian officer think twice about barreling into enemy territory without vastly superior forces; at which point, the insurgents could simply retreat from their camps, allowing their foe to waste their resources on largescale probes into the heavily mined and sabotaged forest. The Nigerian and coalition forces would be forced to adopt a passive defence on the outskirts of the forest, rendered unable to advance due to attritional and morale damages. It is important to note that, in news articles published in November 2016, that the Nigerian Navy is currently deploying sailors to the region in order to supplement the Army and deploy gunboats onto Lake Chad; with the government being forced to deploy it’s navy onto dry land speaks to the desperation in which the Nigerian government seeks to quickly and decisively end the