Hey Mathew,
There are great ideas that is presented within your discussion. I am quiet intrigued when you stated that Ahmed’s behaviour can set up as a bad example to other students. I do believe that it is unfair that Hugh is subjected to inequality in this scenario. There is obviously an issue with only acting in the best interest of Ahmed, which is the opposite of what the codes of ethics encourage (Code of Ethics, 2017). Although Di has implemented a policy that is quite frustrating and one-sided, it is not the best choice to completely ignore her to achieve equality. Di may not have done this out of her own personal beliefs, but through her own ethics. This can be understood through ethical principles such as autonomy and beneficence
There are great ideas that is presented within your discussion. I am quiet intrigued when you stated that Ahmed’s behaviour can set up as a bad example to other students. I do believe that it is unfair that Hugh is subjected to inequality in this scenario. There is obviously an issue with only acting in the best interest of Ahmed, which is the opposite of what the codes of ethics encourage (Code of Ethics, 2017). Although Di has implemented a policy that is quite frustrating and one-sided, it is not the best choice to completely ignore her to achieve equality. Di may not have done this out of her own personal beliefs, but through her own ethics. This can be understood through ethical principles such as autonomy and beneficence