Ah Bun Case Study

Superior Essays
Abstract

This essay will examine the voluntary euthanasia case of Ah Bun in Hong Kong whether is morally permissible or not by considering various factors. First, I will introduce a brief background of euthanasia especially the voluntary one. Second, I will show case the controversy issue of Ah Bun that aroused a heated debate in Hong Kong. Third, I will analyses three reasonable factors of Ah Bun in support of relevant ethical theories. Forth, I will critically examine two opposing reasons using ethical concepts as well. Finally, I will conclude the case of Ah Bun is morally acceptable to carry out voluntary euthanasia and urge the government to take immediate action to regulate related law.

Introduction

“Euthanasia” is commonly known
…show more content…
To begin with, carrying out voluntary euthanasia upon patient’s request is a respect of basic right to him. According to Kant, he believed we all are rational agent with “intrinsic worth”. Therefore we should treat everyone “always as an end and never merely as a means only” to respect his rational capacities. Therefore, we ought not to against Ah Bun’s will to end his life with dignity. Since his action did not induce harm to others in the society, he should have the autonomy to make his own choice for …show more content…
In this case, Ah bun not only had to endure the pain caused by the medical treatment but also had to bear the hopeless waiting to die and how “useless” he thought when he lied on the bed day by day. His family also had to suffer from seeing their dearest son torturing. According to utilitarianism, the morally right action means which can bring the greatest happiness for all concerned. Therefore, if the overall happiness increases (i.e. level of relieving pain for Ah Bun and his family is greater than the loss in happiness for Ah Bun to have a merely possible bright future and for his family to lose a son), he should be allowed to take the voluntary euthanasia.
Also, as stated by Virtue Ethics, his act can also demonstrate the virtues which help achieve eudaimonia , for example Ah Bun can show his courage to face the death and his family and the doctor can exhibit kindness to help Ah Bun relieve

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics and concerns in our society. It crosses many social, political, emotional and moral boundaries which is something many subjects cannot do all at once. This paper is meant to show my personal view on this controversial subject. Margaret Battin’s article ‘Euthanasia: The Fundamental Issues,’ discusses three moral principles that are typically used to argue for the legalization of euthanasia as a regulated practice. These three principles are; the Principle of Mercy, the Principle of (patient) Autonomy, and the Principle of Justice.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is clear that the utmost importance in any medical context is the relationship between the healthcare practitioner and the patient. The duty of a physician is to adhere to certain principles of medical ethics namely the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. By examining the case study involving Dr. Nancy Morrison, one can observe that these principles are often ambiguous when referring to the issue of whether she committed voluntary active euthanasia or nonvoluntary active euthanasia. Thus, the thesis will aim to exemplify that ultimately Dr. Nancy Morrison was culpable for her actions. To give some context to the issue, Paul Mills was a 65-year-old individual suffering from terminal esophageal cancer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Of Euthanasia

    • 1751 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When looking into sources getting different views can greatly broaden the view of the reader and also the author which allows them to make an educated and logical argument on the subject. The topic of physician assisted suicide has many different sides to its argument which makes it a prime candidate in getting opposing views for research. It brings into question the morals and integrity of doctors, and also the morals of the patients and families that choose physician assisted suicide. Many people see it as tarnishing the value of human life, while others believe it gives a person one of their most basic human rights to choose how their body is handled. These types of arguments can change the views of a person when they thought they had come to the right conclusion, which shows the importance of doing in-depth research.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the case like this, how can we insist on the laws of humanity? Besides, the choice of euthanasia is strictly a personal affair. Voluntary euthanasia is a patient - driven action. The patients request a physician’s assistance to relieve their pain.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Controversies have been revolving around the reckless outcomes in the legality of euthanasia. Also known as mercy killing, euthanasia is the implementation of dismissing a life with a terminal illness or intolerable suffering. In the levels of morality and professionalism, it is ludicrous to assist termination of one’s life, especially in a passive or involuntary way. Legalization of euthanasia has proven higher levels of convictions in non-voluntary euthanasia. Thus, the United States as well as many other countries around the world, have developed a negative reputation from controversial cases surrounding assisted suicides.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main argument about physician aid in dying and Euthanasia is whether or not it is ethical and whether or not it should be legal everywhere. However, the decision is the patient’s to make. The controversial topic of Physician Assisted Suicide is well known in the United States, and many people have found conflict in this practice because it breaks some religious values. The legalization of this practice, however is slowly progressing all over the world.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, it will be argued that there is a moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. The distinction is that active euthanasia is the direct involvement of action that cause someone to die. However, passive euthanasia is the inaction of allowing someone to die by not doing something that would prolong the patient’s life. I cannot agree with James Rachel argument of “the bare difference between killing and letting die does not, in itself, make a moral difference,” because killing in active euthanasia and letting one die in passive euthanasia can be differentiate in the notion of the principle cause, intent, and motive of the action vs inaction (Vaughn, 2017).…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We live in the year 2015, and still it is illegal to grant an individual in need the right to a peaceful departure. Euthanasia offers patients the option to leave their life happier than they would have been otherwise. Furthermore, it is a decision that a patient should be given the right to in times of intense suffering, considering that it is their own life. Finally, the absence of euthanasia has denied so many the end that they have desired through years of…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Active euthanasia is when direct action is taken, ending the life of the patient. I chose to focus my paper on the article entitled “Voluntary Active Euthanasia” written by Dan W. Brock. In "Voluntary Active Euthanasia", Brock analyzes the arguments for and against the legalization of active euthanasia. From his perspective, an individual’s well-being and control over…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Rachel’s paper he wants his readers to reach the conclusion that “active euthanasia is sometimes morally permissible” (Rachels 266). In his paper he chooses to expand and revise a Utilitarian argument, but for this paper I am choosing to focus on his discussion of “the argument from mercy.” Rachels chooses to focus on one main point of the argument from mercy, “Terminally ill patients sometimes suffer pain so horrible that it is beyond the comprehension of those who have not actually experience it” (Rachels 267). This quote helps to point out that people who usually argue against active euthanasia are not usually people who have experienced a terminal illness and the possible pain that can accompany that.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One great thinker that has examined the morality of what has become known as voluntary euthanasia is Professor Peter Singer. Singer, in general, believes that voluntary euthanasia is morally permissible and goes to great lengths supporting his viewpoint. Despite his well-supported opinion, there are other thinkers that disagree with his moral reasoning. Each of those philosophers explains in detail the flaws…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When a patient gives their agreement is considered voluntary euthanasia; however, non-voluntary occurs when a person cannot agree because they are in a coma (Naga & Mrayyan, 2013). This written assignment will focus…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays