He subdued and reigned over his enemies all throughout modern day France and well into the neighboring lands that would become Spain, Italy and Germany. This titan of ancient times is often remembered only by his conquests, but the accounts of Einhart and Notker show him in much more depth and color, leaving the readers with a well fleshed out, multifaceted mental image of the man behind the conquest. To define Charlemagne by his trials helps present him in stark terms. He was a man of staunch faith who worked hard for its propagation. In contrast to his love of Christianity, Charles’ apparent self-adulation provides a new dimension showing a seeming contradiction of what was, at once, a godly man and a king driven by his love of self.…
The Roman Empire fell apart due to poor decisions in military, political, and economic policies. At the empire’s height it stretched from the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea, the empire had to stretch its military thin to provide troops on every front. However Document 1’s map depicts the failure to protect its frontiers which allowed…
16 CE the Roman general Germanicus (15 BCE-19 CE) led his troops into Germania, in defiance of Augustus' dictate that the Rhine should be the boundary of Rome, to retrieve the Standards lost by Varas' defeat. Augustus was dead by then and Tiberius ruled Rome but, still, the previous boundary stood. Historians since have agreed that Germanicus' campaign was driven by revenge, his desire to rally the troops around him and, as a symbol of their personal loyalty to him and to Rome, the retrieval of the Standards. He massacred as many of the indigenous people as he could in retribution for the Roman defeat and recovered two of the three Standards lost in the Battle of Teutoburg Forest. While the people of Rome applauded his victories, he was denied advancement by Tiberius for acting outside of the established policy and also, no doubt, for engaging in a campaign which would have contributed to Germanicus' popularity at Tiberius'…
While he absorbs several territories and ethnic groups into his empire, Charlemagne’s ability to manipulate language and connect with his subjects ultimately what separated his persona from that of a tyrant. Furthermore, in prioritizing Charlemagne’s articulation and elevated speech, Einhard establishes a direct connection between Charlemagne and other renowned Roman orators, such as Cicero and Seneca. This emphasis in turn places Charlemagne within the Roman Empire’s literary tradition, and attributes his successful communication with his subjects to Rome’s legacy of…
Legendary Foundation of Rome Republic vs. Historical Realities and Women. I will attempt to compare the legendary foundation of the republic of Rome described by Livy in a document called The Rape of Lucretia with the historical realities described in The History of Western Societies, a text book. I will also look at the structure of the Roman family and views on women. I will show that the description by Livy and the realities of Rome are very close and my hope is that you will be able to see how Livy’s myth could be plausible. I also hope that you will be able to see in my argument that women at this time were no more than a piece of property with minimal rights, but there was an aspect of respect as to the need for and devotion of women…
Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa: Rome’s Pillar of Strength Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa is known mainly as Augustus’ right hand man, who helped him reach the top against every obstacle he faced and his most trusted friend. He was a man whose intelligence and wisdom were beyond his years, ranging from military prowess to technical ingenuity that had not been seen before. Many of Augustus’ greatest triumphs can be directly traced to his friend’s exceptional efforts and talent, and the unwavering faith that Augustus had in him. Agrippa was more than a Roman general; he was the foundation of Augustus’ success and the pillar of Roman strength that held strong and true. Not much is known of Marcus Agrippa’s background, for many ancient historians did not…
Agrippina the younger was the first empress of the Roman Empire, which almost no modern sources remembered her as such; Agrippina was not often remembered at all, unlike Augustus and his wife Livia. Agrippina’s the younger played an important notable role in the Julio-Claudian family performance. Which had influenced her as its origin the only resource available to women of her time, and especially the male power. Agrippina was before Livia and the wife of one emperor and the mother of another. She was also the sister of a third and the daughter of a prince of the royal houses, which the shadows fell across ruling beliefs long after the price death.…
Introduction: Suetonius and Augustus Suetonius’ approach to biography is elucidated by centring focus on the Life of Augustus. Suetonius rose to prominence as a scholar, and later gained positions in Hadrian’s court, with his work The Twelve Caesars dated tentatively to the reign of Hadrian between 117-38 C.E. He did not write in a chronological style like his contemporary Plutarch, but rather divided his work thematically, into categories such as birth, achievements, career, morals and death, although the structure varied within his work. One of the proposed reasons for this structure is that Suetonius was inspired by Augustus’ Res Gestae. Erik Gunderson argues that Suetonius used Augustus’ Res Gestae as an exempla, while his section on…
In this part the author focuses on the neighboring cities to Rome. He refers to these as a “more traditional and convenient target (p.191)”. Using other articles and books as his sources, he proves his point that the outsiders to the Roman Empire were potentially the most dangerous enemy it ever had. Also by continuing chronologically through time he demonstrates examples of outsiders being a violent disturbance to the Roman Order.…
In the first chapter of William V. Harris’s book, War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, the author makes use of primary sources, such as Polybius, and archeological evidence to analyze Roman attitudes towards war. Since warfare was an integral part of life for the Roman Empire, Harris attempts to provide the reasoning behind their desire to continuously engage in battle. Specifically, in the first half of chapter one entitled, “Roman Attitudes Towards War”, Harris looks at the aristocracy and their general feelings towards war. Overall, Harris claims there were multiple political and social reasons that Romans engaged in war. Specifically, Harris analyzes that with regards to the aristocracy, war gave them opportunities to further their political…
a. The Roman Empire began around 753 BC and fell around 476 AD. In 150 BC – 70 AD, Rome conquered majority of continental Europe, Asia Minor, Palestine, Syria and Egypt. b. The thesis of this chapter is the acceptance of others in the Roman Empire without judgement. This was important to include because every freeborn male born into the empire was allowed citizenship, it also allowed men to take part in making political decisions.…
In the article “Childhood in the Roman Empire” by Ray Laurence, the author goes into detail describing the trials and tribulations of children of the Roman Empire. This article expresses a significant level of focus toward the depiction of children’s life in the ancient Rome. Laurence determines few of the disturbing aspects of childhood, clarifying that the children of the ancient period had to live their difficult life suffering a lot of complications. These notably included the witnessed worsening conditions of the children that considerably involved endless work, violence, sickness, and death.…
The Fall of the Republic was caused not only by one individual’s actions or one event but a culmination of several actions from different individuals and events. Unfortunately, some influenced massively in the Roman society. There Large and quick expansions from Rome’s foundation as an underdeveloped city; creating enormous holes in the governing and political ability in the Senate. While the powerful individuals of Roman mob like the general were jockeyed for position. The Roman life was facing differences far more rapidly than the governing body could manage.…
Explain the negative effects of the Roman conquests Rome held a fate that would be devastating to the city-state following its great conquests. However, to understand the unraveling of the Roman republic, it’s important to understand how Rome obtained the position it had and what ultimately caused the negative effects. To do this an overview of how Rome became the fairest one of all is necessary. This essay will briefly examine how Rome rose to power and through power and greatness lost its upper hand and became torn.…
Explain the negative effects of the Roman Conquest Introduction The Roman conquest was the results of their selfish, ambitious, and avaricious, and who lacked the genuine taste and generous spirit which belong to the highest type of human culture (Morey, 1901). Although Rome had expanded their territories as the results of their conquest the negative effects led to the beginning of fall of the Roman Republic. Externally, Rome was viewed as the supreme power of the world.…