Agrifound Case Study Solution

Jim Teague’s decision regarding whether to give the loan to KiraFlour or not seems simple on the surface, however it is much more complex. The decision making process requires a number of responsibilities and ethical considerations to be examined. Accordingly, Jim must take into account all stakeholders in this decision: his employer, his client, the people of Tanzania, and himself. Overall, Jim should not proceed with giving the AgriFund loan to KiraFlour. By not proceeding with the loan, Jim is maintaining the financial health and credibility of his employer, protecting his client, Baba, from potential failure, protecting the health of multiple Tanzanians, and preserving his code of morality. To approached how to make this decision, …show more content…
First, this related to AgriFund and Jim’s employer, Allen Sweatman. Ultimately, Jim had to be making this choice in the name of the company, as that is what he was trusted to do. Because of this, his loyalty should be with Allen. The two concerns relating to KiraFlour’s business, the E. coli in the flour and the selling of unlicensed products, should have immediately rang bells for Jim, as they could result in credit, litigation, and reputation losses for AgriFund. If the E. coli report is true, this could lead to KiraFlour shutting down, which means that they would no longer be able to repay AgriFund’s loan, posing risks for Allen and the rest of the company. If the their mission is well-intentioned, they should not have to encounter these problems if they are preventable. AgriFund likely can pull from a plethora of other healthy companies that are in dire need of a loan. Jim has to be objective and try to remove his emotional connection from the situation to realize that this money may work better elsewhere. In the end, AgriFund has to focus on their triple bottom line: financial, social, and environmental value. If Jim’s decision even has the possibility of tainting one of these aspects, he should know it is not in the company’s best interest to do …show more content…
It may be easier to say yes and maintain his relationship with Baba, but Jim would feel great guilt if something went wrong later on. Jim has already been introspective enough to realize that he would not be so willing to justify roadblocks along the path to giving Baba a loan if this was taking place in the United States. He realizes that he is downplaying risks and rationalizing his failure to take action. Based on his initial morals that he would never take part in a bribe; ergo, the same logic should follow in this decision--just because it is in Tanzania should not make a difference. Jim is a value-oriented person, so he has used these to come to this final decision. After precisely looking into the different responsibilities to the varying stakeholders in this situation, it is the most logical for Jim to withhold the loan from