Hunter Gatherers and agriculturalists are different in their own ways. Hunter gatherers basically have all the food that they are acquired to have. Both societies know when each season was coming. An advantage hunter gatherers have is when contribute 70 percent of the food supply, but a disadvantage is when they don’t have enough food where they’re locate at, so they have to go to different locations to search for food. An advantage the agriculturalists have is when they don’t need to move to many different locations because they never run out of food, but still need to keep producing and maintaining crops to survive.
Hunter gatherer assorted where they were located at. The agriculturalists were not steady about their food supply. Both groups …show more content…
Agriculturalists had a bigger amount because there was a bigger food supply. Advantages for a small population is less people to feed, but a disadvantage is having less people to work. A disadvantage for a bigger population would be feeding the people because of the small amount of food they have. An advantage hunter gatherers have would be having more people to help and grow crops. Most of the population both hunter gatherers and agriculturalists depend on the technology.
Agriculturalists had more technology than the hunter gatherers. Both groups can survive without technology. Hunter gatherers disadvantage was when they have to move so much just to find food, to able to survive. Both hunter gatherers and agriculturalists survive with all their food supply they had, including the people, and the amount of technology.
Covering all sources, both societies were manage to survive their daily struggles. A comparison between both societies have were able to survive using their comprehension. Both groups knew their valuable resources , most importantly their location and their advanced to technology. Including to this information, both hunter gatherers and agriculturalists don’t have much in common, but were able to survive in their own
Hunter gatherer assorted where they were located at. The agriculturalists were not steady about their food supply. Both groups …show more content…
Agriculturalists had a bigger amount because there was a bigger food supply. Advantages for a small population is less people to feed, but a disadvantage is having less people to work. A disadvantage for a bigger population would be feeding the people because of the small amount of food they have. An advantage hunter gatherers have would be having more people to help and grow crops. Most of the population both hunter gatherers and agriculturalists depend on the technology.
Agriculturalists had more technology than the hunter gatherers. Both groups can survive without technology. Hunter gatherers disadvantage was when they have to move so much just to find food, to able to survive. Both hunter gatherers and agriculturalists survive with all their food supply they had, including the people, and the amount of technology.
Covering all sources, both societies were manage to survive their daily struggles. A comparison between both societies have were able to survive using their comprehension. Both groups knew their valuable resources , most importantly their location and their advanced to technology. Including to this information, both hunter gatherers and agriculturalists don’t have much in common, but were able to survive in their own