Agrarian Republic: John Adams And Alexander Hamilton

Superior Essays
In 1789, America had been a country for only eleven years. The country was rapidly changing, with Western expansion, more public institutes of higher learning, and the founders realized they could not go on with the Articles of Confederation. The problems with the articles were numerous, however the overall issue was that the government had virtually no power, as they could not collect taxes. Although they had power the power to declare wars and issue laws, the states had the real power to tax and enforce those laws. The Articles of Confederation were not a complete and final law, they were simply rules for the new nation to live under while separating from England. The process of creating a complete and lasting Constitution was overdue. With …show more content…
At the convention, John Adams and Alexander Hamilton represented those views. Although the two men did not get along, they both believed in a strong central government that controlled many aspects of everyday life. They were closer ideologically to the monarchy of England than the for the people republican ideals. Instead of having a president elected by direct popular vote, the Federalists believed that a leader should be chosen by a few elite electors. The compromise reached with James Madison, who was in favor of direct democracy, was the electoral college system still in place today. John Adams did not have as much faith in the Constitution as his fellow founding fathers did, believing only “a moral and upright people can follow these rules, and although yesterday I knew a few of those men, today I know none.” Adams was quoted saying after the committee, when he had a falling out with fellow Federalist Alexander Hamilton. Adams followed a stoic belief system, that of Socrates and Confucius, which believed that all happiness came from moral virtue. John Adams himself was away as ambassador during the signing of the Constitutional Convention, a fact he long rued, but hoped his ideas would be carried out by …show more content…
A delegate from Virginia, he was also an author of the Virginia plan. He came to the Constitutional Convention and expected it to be another Virgina plan on a federal level. However, his ideas were soon shattered by the bombastic Hamilton. An educated man, one of the youngest there, he argued more elegantly for republicanism than James Madison did. However, he was a fervent slaveholder and did not want there to be a chance of his rights being removed. He believed that a federal government that does not believe in state's right would do that. Together with James Madison, Randolph produced the three branches of government to balance each other out. Even after his advice was written into the Constitution, and being elected to attorney general under George Washington, he failed to sign the completed document, despite writing a majority of it. His fellow delegates asked for an explanation, and he simply said,”(The) Republican propositions of the Virginia Plan had much to his regret been widely, and in his opinion, irreconcilably departed from." His boycott of the Constitution did not deter his political path; he went on the be Secretary of State under

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    At last, because of his efforts New York sent three delegates to the convention, Hamilton included. Hamilton not only contributed to the commencement of the convention, but hey played a key role in the ratification process as well.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Miracle at Philadelphia, Bowen describes Madison, stating, “Madison’s power lay in the grasp of the subject at hand, an ability to compare one political system or idea with another, at lightning speed equating present with past. His convictions were deep and passionate. But by training or by natural endowment he possessed a ruthless tenacity and could await his moment, then rise, his mind free, and without oratory or display put down or reassure the opposition.” Madison utilized such skills to refute the arguments of his fellow delegates, such as with William Paterson’s New Jersey Plan, therefore influencing the formulation of the United States Constitution. The ideas of both James Wilson and James Madison presented throughout the duration of the Constitutional Convention served to shape the Constitution in multiple…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the time John Adam’s presidency came to an end in 1800, two political parties surfaced with contradicting interpretations of the United States Constitution. The Democratic-Republicans had a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while Federalists had a loose interpretation. However, there beliefs were not always completely enforced by either party. In the election of 1800, Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican came to office. Although Democratic-Republicans presented themselves as “the guardians of agrarian purity, liberty, and states rights,” the occasionally shifted their beliefs if they thought it would benefit the United States.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander Hamilton wanted strict interpretation to the Constitution, it is to be obeyed as how it was written. There could be no other possible way or bend to the rules of what the founding fathers of this country established. Thomas Jefferson however did want there to be a sort of “what if” factor to the Constitution. Jefferson believed in loose interpretation. This thinking would lead to what is called “the elastic clause” in government where in the Constitution, the rules are in set motion, but there are times when it is bended due to a certain situation where something would be considered legal although the Constitution deemed it illegal to begin.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787, there were many issues with the Articles of Confederation. They were weak and had little power. The Articles were weak because they had no national court system, and no power to enforce treaties or laws either, among…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Gordon, Hamilton is one of the most important figures in American history as he established the foundation for the economic power that America would become. In fact, “Historians and political scientists commonly credit Alexander Hamilton’s economic plans for revitalizing the American economy and providing the impetus for extended economic progress.” (489) Hamilton’s ideas quickly became central aspects of the modern capitalist economy that would continue to develop and flourish over time. In fact, Hamilton’s financial program was very successful as it led to the development of the New York Stock Exchange which is now the largest financial exchange in the world. Overall, Hamilton’s financial plan for the new government proved to be successful as his ideas were continually carried out even after his death.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After establishing his role in the government, it was then that his philosophies and notions came to life where he commanded a battalion during the Revolutionary War alongside other prominent officers such as the Marquis de Lafayette. After the war had ended, Hamilton was appointed the very first Secretary of the Treasury where he oversaw the elective reign of the first president, George Washington. As well as these two extremely notable and important roles that Hamilton played while he was alive, he was also responsible for writing fifty-one of the eighty-five installments of The Federalist Papers, the most important referencing point for the United States Constitution of America. Hamilton’s contributions, however abnormal or unusual they might have been for his time, continue to change and shape America into a better country, even some two hundred years from when he was…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was agreed upon in the Constitution that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Jefferson). By stating this it was absolute that those who were in a position of power are there because the people they over-see. Some of the men behind the support for the Constitution were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. Although the Federalist strongly supported this change there were many disagreements from the Anti-Federalist group. The main argument came from those who believed this new Constitution would strengthen government at the expense of its people and independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He stressed the importance of the need for the support of his fellow citizens and urged many politicians to consider what policies agreed with what the people wanted in the government at the time. Without Hamilton’s political views and public policies, the nation would have suffered in finding a solid foundation for currency and…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamilton started from unlikely beginnings, but went on to be one of the Founding Fathers of our country. He impacted not just the time he lived in, but some of the core systems and processes that the United States still use today. His focus on a stronger, more centralized government kept much of the young nations’ military alive, and helped pave the road for much of modern economics. Hamilton helped in the creation of the Constitution and held the first ever position of Secretary of Treasury, all while having political and social adventures. He founded one of the two first political parties and established methods of politics that had never been seen before.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The convention discussed removing the three-fifths compromise, requiring a two-thirds supermajority in Congress for the admission of new states, declarations of war, and laws restricting trade. The Hartford Convention was a complete reverse for the Federalist Party. In order to stop Democrat Republican rule, the Federalists resorted to becoming strict constructionists and discussing limiting the power of the federal government, a feat that they opposed altogether. In conclusion, it is therefore evident that although the administrative of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, both supposedly Republican, tried to maintain republican beliefs, rather the beliefs were led by Federalists such as Daniel Webster, as stated in his speech.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two years later he was elected in to the Continental Congress where he was recognized for his power. James Madison knew the Articles of Confederation were flawed and feared the government would not be able to win the war. He believed a stronger government could protect the United States. As he attended conventions, he took the lead for the Federalist on arguing why a constitution should be…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When John Adams (supporter of Hamilton’s Ideas) and Jefferson become President and Vice President, the Constitution broke down even more because it didn’t anticipate a contested election with two different political parties (federalist vs Anti-federalist) at the head of the White House. Again, as a result, the ideals of both revolutionists’ sides didn’t lineup with the…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Anti Federalism Dbq

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During this turbulent time after the war, an elite group of representatives from all the states met and drafted a new Constitution, one that proposed to settle the question once and for all in favor of the large, unified government. They then sent the Constitution out for ratification by the people, forcing every patriot to choose their side: either to be an Anti-Federalist or a Federalist. The Anti-Federalists, who upheld a small republic founded upon a bill of rights as the best form of administration, viewed the Constitution as an inadequate safeguard of their hard-won liberties, and they therefore condemned it as extremely dangerous. The Federalists, conversely, firmly believed that without a larger government, the unchecked power of irrational factions would threaten every individual’s liberties and therefore the Constitution that they had created was desperately…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays