Agnostica's Rights

1. In case a state is depriving people of the right to self-determination, then another state or all the other states have the right to request in accordance with the international rules to allow them to use their right to self-determination, since the accused state is obligated because the self-determination is a right and obligation towards all and no one should be deprived. No state should claim that if another state is supporting a referendum for self-determination, because it is not a matter that is only for the domestic jurisdiction, but it is also of international relevance. The actions that Reverentia made for East Agnostica it is in consistent with international law because it doesn’t threat force ,actually with the military troops to the border they were just assisting in humanitarian …show more content…
Agnostica breached the Marthite Convention by unilateral termination, and this is an international wrongful act, because they didn’t neither consult or negotiate with Reverentia, nor wait at least three months after they notified that they want the termination of the Convention. In the Convention were expressed their rights and obligations and Agnostica have no right to terminate it whenever it wants because there are rules that prohibits it , because it is needed mutual consent. In conclusion of this facts Reverentia states that the Marthite Convention is still in effect.
4. Reverentia’s removal of the software in the Marthite extraction facilities was a countermeasures and even though it may constitute as unlawful act ,they made it because they wanted to force Agnostica to continue with the Convention. In such a condition this countermeasure that took Reverentia was only to preserve its rights, because Reverentia wanted only that the Agnostica to complete its obligation under the Marthite Convention and not to terminate it by unilateral declaration. Reverentias removal of the software in the Marthite extraction facilities was consistent with international