A major point raised in the article against the ALS ice bucket challenge was moral licensing, which can be defined in context as people feeling less obligated to donate if they have done so in the past. Within this notion, several questions can be raised, such as can the action of donating to a charity ever be truely unethical? And more specifically, Is it morally problematic if charitable donors believe they are doing more good than they actually are? The example used in the text is that donating $55 000 to the ALS association and extending the life of one man or conversely using the same sum to save the life of 20 children with malaria.
To answer this question one must look at certain ethical principles and ideologies,for example using kantian
To answer this question one must look at certain ethical principles and ideologies,for example using kantian