Zombie Argument Against Physicalism

Zombie argument against physicalism
Within the academic realm of philosophy, it is understood that zombies are more or less, imaginary creatures, and their main purpose is to shed light on many problems that philosophy aims to investigate. Needless to say, these unsolved issues are primarily related to consciousness, as well as its relation to our physical world. Compared with those in magic or movies, zombies are just like humans in every material aspect but without conscious experiments. However, zombies behave like humans and some even spend a great deal of time discussing consciousness. While few people believe in the presence of zombies, many states are at least conceivable and some argue that it is possible. Thus, some argue that if zombies were indeed an increasingly potential possibility, then the type of binary-realm is true and physicalism is incorrect after all. This argument is the main importance of the zombie idea to many philosophers although it also generates attention to pre-assumptions regarding the nature of consciousness as well as the relationship between physical and phenomenon. In addition, the use of the idea of coma versus physical …show more content…
This argument refutes these allegations on the grounds that zombies can be conceived and all conceivable possible even without consciousness. The zombie argument poses a threat to materialism by suggesting that materialism is not correct because it assumes the impossibility of zombies, which is conceivable and possible. It is worth mentioning that the argument or idea of coma also generates many concerns and questions about the connection between perception, imagination, and possibility as presented in materialism. Therefore, the zombie argument means that the material is false because it is logically possible for the zombies to exist and consciousness to be inexplicably