Harper et al. (2009) modeled how to use the central tenets of CRT to analyze the history of African Americans in higher education and to assess policy decisions that nullified African Americans advancements to access higher education. One verdict that Harper et al. (2009) alleged contributed to the regression of Blacks was the 1954 ruling of Brown v. the Board of Education. The scholars goes on and state that because Brown v. the Board of Education was ruled unconstitutional to educate blacks and whites separately, insinuating that blacks were inferior to whites due to the perception that white institutions would provide a better education for
Harper et al. (2009) modeled how to use the central tenets of CRT to analyze the history of African Americans in higher education and to assess policy decisions that nullified African Americans advancements to access higher education. One verdict that Harper et al. (2009) alleged contributed to the regression of Blacks was the 1954 ruling of Brown v. the Board of Education. The scholars goes on and state that because Brown v. the Board of Education was ruled unconstitutional to educate blacks and whites separately, insinuating that blacks were inferior to whites due to the perception that white institutions would provide a better education for