Aegisthus

Great Essays
Back home, one of my former classmates awaits his sentencing after recently being found guilty of capital murder. He has a calm temperament, a few friends and ability for genius endeavors. No one thought anything of him, until he killed a elderly man and attacked the man’s wife in the couple’s own home. He chose the house because it “felt right” and the day because the “weather was beautiful,” He came to school the next day and aced his chemistry test. The following day, police arrested him and found a hit list including one of my dance teammates, other fellow students and his adoptive parents. The punishment phase perseveres to find justice for the elderly couple, deciding between a life sentence and execution. But what about the justice for …show more content…
This differs from normal virtues where the masses have a common definition and know its apparent portrayal in actions of themselves and others. For example, the Argive elders praised the honor of the men following their ruler to fight in Troy and called Aegisthus, who stayed behind “a coward” (Ag. 1644) and Orestes emasculated him by calling him a “woman at heart” (Cho. 305). Although the people describing Aegisthus had different experiences with him, they saw the same lack of a quality in him in comparison to the honored and glorified men that protected Argive. Virtues such as honor are apparent but justice is more obscure as most everyone has their own view on how justice should work. Apollo represents a type of justice that also extends mercy to those who did wrong with right reasoning and describes the Furies’ type of justice that “slaughters men for their crimes,- where heads are cut off and eyes gouged out” where no mercy is shown (Eum. 186-187). These types of justice often conflict and cause chaos when disagreements arise. The pursuance of these different justices leads one man to be loved as a merciful, good, just man, whereas the other man is cruel, unjust and unforgiving. This results even though each of them actively pursues the same virtue of justice, but carries it out in different ways. Not only are there different types of justice, but different justice occurs for different …show more content…
Being just can lead to a prosperous life. The Furies recommend all to “freely embrace Justice- and you will surely prosper,- you will never know destruction” (Eu. 550-552) This is similar to other virtues that can lead to, but does not guarantee, a good life. In fact, Furies warn men to “respect Justice, never kick away her alter for the glimpse of wealth” just ten lines before they promise prosperous lives as award for justice (Eu. 539-540). These conflicting views show the complex results of being just and pursuing justices. Even though one is just, they may not necessarily live comfortably. Even those who are just struggle with temptations to chase after wealth. Likewise, possessing other virtues does not lead to a certain wealth. Furies also state that in order to have justice, one must be in fear of the consequences to their own actions, for “how can the man or city that has no fear to nourish the heart ever have respect for Justice?” (Eu. 522-525). The Furies believe that fear is the root to justice and that a person can not be just without fear. This differs from other virtues that do not require fear; many virtues, such as courage, criticize fear. Additionally, justice is constantly changing which person or group is being favored, as “the scales of Justice tilt suddenly,- for those who bask in the light,- for those who dwell in the shadows,- for the powerless shrouded by the night” (Cho. 61-65).

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Revenge Cycle In ancient Greece, retributive justice served as both a strict societal code and an expectation of the cosmos. In The Eumenides by Aeschylus, the Furies serve as the defenders of this justice, which is explored in depth during the Furies’ monologue as they pursue Orestes for his matricide. In order to understand this passage fully, the reader must first grasp the Furies’ sense of justice.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In What Do Murderers Deserve? David Gelernter explores the idea of the death penalty, and its acceptable uses. He does this by providing complex ideas, analogies, and examples, allowing his numerous evidence to actually prove his point. His writing style is eloquent and slightly inflammatory, as he tries to inspire support to an issue that is often pushed to the periphery of other discussions.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Historically, many atrocities have been committed to certain persons, leading to cycles of revenge and cries of innocence. In politics, forgiveness can only have the true meaning when revenge stops and the accused stop working towards proving innocence. The need to publicly know what mistakes were done is important into accepting and deciding to forgive. Nevertheless, forgiveness differs from mercy because the former entails a situation where the victim works to overcome vices like resentment and hatred while mercy comes in when certain passions like love are involved. Therefore, forgiveness can only occur in the right context.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When someone commits a crime there are many punishments they can receive. House arrest, fines, jail time are some of the most common. But one type of punishment is the most polarizing of them all, the death penalty. Whether the death penalty should be used is often a debated topic between the science of killing someone for their crimes, or the more religious beliefs that it is cruel and unusual to use the death penalty. When considering people who were sentenced to the death penalty like Gregg, Penry, and Baze.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Republic written by Plato is one of the early works of political philosophy. Using dialogue between students and Socrates, his teacher, Plato attempts to define justice and explain why being just is rewarding. Republic ends with the myth of Er, a story about a man who travels to the afterlife then returns to tell what he saw. The myth of Er fits into the rest of Republic because it supports the assertion that being just is beneficial and that being just or unjust is a choice; however, it appears different than the rest of the book because the myth introduces a different reason why justice is advantageous, and it has a non-dialectical style. These differences support the idea that Plato may have used the myth of Er to persuade those who…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine if you awaken to find out that the night before, a family member was murdered? How would you feel? Some would feel mournful and grief-stricken while others urge for justice or vengeance. Presume that the convicted murderer is thrown in prison to rot. Knowing that, you would feel relieved knowing justice was being served.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To be just or not to be just? This is a question that the weak face as Thrasymachus views justice as the “advantage of the stronger” (Plato, The Republic, 338c). Thrasymachus’ view of justice is challenging as it benefits the rulers, and leaves the perspectives of the weaker unattended to, triggering us to ask the question: how can we find a solution to challenge Thrasymachus’ dark view of justice? Thrasymachus’ view of justice is one-sided, thus Cephalus and Polemarchus characterizes justice as the interest of the weak rather than only the strong, while Glaucon and Adeimantus entail that there is a discrepancy between the ruler’s definition of justice and the weak’s definition of justice.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Role Of Honor In The Iliad

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The definition, importance, and paths to achieve honor have all changed across history. From the bloodthirsty, conflict-fueled honor of the Romans to the modern day, Western concept of a solid moral platform from which one acts, honor proves itself diverse in form and difficult to gain. For the Ancient Greeks, especially in battle, honor was firmly affixed to respect and glory; this concept is easily relayed through Homer’s The Iliad. Instead of purely stating the events of the Trojan War, Homer uses its characters as platforms from which he can add his own perspectives regarding the true value of honor.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dialogue between Socrates and Meno revolve around a fundamental issue: whether virtue can be taught. However, Socrates indicates that it is unfeasible to answer this question without knowing what virtue really is. He is interested in knowing the intrinsic nature of a virtue and what makes all instances of virtue, virtuous. In other words, the reason why something is a virtue. Although Meno produces his first faulty definition when he says, “If you want the virtue of man, it is easy to say that a man’s virtue consists of being able to manage public affairs…, and be submissive to her husband” (71e), it still does not answer Socrates’ question.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Oxford Dictionary, justice is being defined as a just behavior or a treatment. In the ancient Greek, justice has been perceived differently. Different philosophers have different arguments towards that topic of “ What is Justice?”. Plato elaborates on this topic in his book Republic to give his opinion about what justice is through different characters such as, Thrasymachus and Socrates. Thrasymachus is a sophist, who challenged the view of justice and moral values and gives a glimpse of the kind of the point of view from someone who lives in the 5th century Athenians.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why follow the rules? Why not get what you want when you want it however you can get it? The mere function of today’s world is based on the elite necessity to have every citizen obey their laws. In addition, people never stop to ask themselves, “Why is there a pressing validity in the action of obeying wholesome rules, and how does this benefit me personally”? Thrasymachus addresses the underlining importance behind morality and the misleading advantages that follow with being virtuous.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “To recapitulate: the idea of justice supposes two things; a rule of conduct, and a sentiment which sanctions the rule”(Mill, 45). In regards to justice there are two main factors for Mill. The first being equality and the second being punishment. The goal of punishment is to establish order and reorder of social order, and vengeance is an animalistic desire that is natural. Without equality we wouldn’t be able to regard other peoples happiness and therefore justice becomes a concept that is derived from higher-level thinking and vengeance is a mixture of animalistic thinking and abstract thinking.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Book I of Plato’s Republic, Socrates and Polemarchus debate the assertion “it is just to give to each what is owed to him,” that Simonides originally theorized. The postulation develops from Cephalus’ prior claim that a just man is one who “speaks the truth and repays his debts” (331d). Socrates undermines Cephalus’ definition of justice by proposing a scenario wherein a madman lends a sword to a friend, and the friend may either return the weapon or keep it from the obviously dangerous individual. Socrates concludes that returning the weapon, which would be the “just” action according to Cephalus because it constitutes honest repayment, is unjust. In his debate with Polemarchus, Socrates once again critiques the proposed relationship between…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics