Advocate Vs Facilitator Case Study

Mediation: Advocate vs Facilitator From the first mediation class, I learned that the mediator’s role is to ease a conversation in order to guide two or more conflicting parties towards a resolution. Consequently, it is imperative that the mediator is trusted by all parties in order to allow comfortability with the issue, sharing their interests, and conflict resolution process. As facilitators of the process, mediators do not have a stake in the outcome of the mediation. Their role is to be caring, impartial, and attentive throughout the process and challenge the parties to reflect on their interests and positions while working towards a common ground. Each individual at the mediation table is an advocate for their own position. In negotiation processes, an agent can advocate on behalf of a principal. In multiparty mediation, I have observed that sometimes one or several people may additionally facilitate the conversation. In many instances, playing double duty at the mediation table is setting up for failure or intensity in the conflict at hand. Facilitators are meant to help ease a conversation and ensure a conducive atmosphere. They help maintain effective conversations by guiding parties involved with challenging questions, and making sure that all voices are heard. Thus, they guide learning for the …show more content…
Oftentimes, unless there is a designated external mediator, the facilitator also plays an advocate role. Advocates are typically pushing for certain concerns while speaking on behalf of another person and/or organization. They defend their opinion while holding their given position and cause. In negotiation, the agent, who negotiates on behalf of a principal is the advocate. In certain instances, personal feelings towards a cause can also affect an agents negotiation strategy and how they interact with parties at a mediation