An advertiser is a person that tries to sell you something and is normally excessively engaged in their job. As you can tell by now the juror, I was assigned to watch and take notes throughout the novel Twelve Angry Men is juror twelve. A way to explain the personality of juror twelve is very cheesy he uses this idea of advertising language which is tremendously cheesy way of wording statements for example “Here’s an idea. Let’s run it up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes it.”(Rose 16). Another personality, he brought along from his job was relating everything back to graphs, numbers and statistics. Away from his personalities he brought from work he was acutely easy to sway and could be convinced very easily also seemed to be very
…show more content…
The other jurors vote seemed to alter what juror twelve voted for. The first vote was eleven to one, the only juror that voted not guilty was juror eight. Juror twelve never stated a complete reason why he voted guilty instead just said he agreed with what the other jurors said. The second vote was still not really what juror twelve thought he just voted for what majority voted for and left at that and just want to not be the one holding everyone at the courthouse when he really should have voted for what he believed and fought for it. After many votes of most of the jurors are guilty, juror eight explains why he voted not guilty. After that, the other jurors start thinking that juror eight isn’t completely deranged and is being very logical in this situation. When the vote is six to six it seemed as that juror twelve started to think that everyone is going not guilty so he should as well. Juror twelve never officially established reasonable doubt, instead just followed the band wagon. For the final vote when the jurors came to the conclusion that the boy is innocent, I think that juror twelve was happy he voted not guilty and did the right thing but he was happier that he got out of the hot room and can go back to
The other jurors vote seemed to alter what juror twelve voted for. The first vote was eleven to one, the only juror that voted not guilty was juror eight. Juror twelve never stated a complete reason why he voted guilty instead just said he agreed with what the other jurors said. The second vote was still not really what juror twelve thought he just voted for what majority voted for and left at that and just want to not be the one holding everyone at the courthouse when he really should have voted for what he believed and fought for it. After many votes of most of the jurors are guilty, juror eight explains why he voted not guilty. After that, the other jurors start thinking that juror eight isn’t completely deranged and is being very logical in this situation. When the vote is six to six it seemed as that juror twelve started to think that everyone is going not guilty so he should as well. Juror twelve never officially established reasonable doubt, instead just followed the band wagon. For the final vote when the jurors came to the conclusion that the boy is innocent, I think that juror twelve was happy he voted not guilty and did the right thing but he was happier that he got out of the hot room and can go back to