Rationalism, Empiricism And Skepticism

Improved Essays
Knowledge is what makes the world go around. Knowledge is needed for all kinds of jobs and could be considered a “gift” for mankind. Our understanding of the world and universe is based off of humanity’s knowledge around them; knowledge is everywhere from the job market to schools, to even recreational activities such as video games; for example, knowing which characters are the protagonists, or which characters are the antagonists. In philosophy however, there are three main types of knowledge: Rationalism, Empiricism and Skepticism. Each type of knowledge has its own advantages and disadvantages however, comparing the three types of the knowledges with the benefits and drawbacks of each, rationalism would be the best out of the three.

Firstly, philosophical rationalism is defined as a view that appeals to intellectual and logical reasons as the source of knowledge or justification. Rationalism is the idea of every fact is a fact for a reason; everything in rationalism is based off of logic thus, nothing is just “made up”; rationalism often exists in the fields of math and science. For instance, René Descartes was one of the earliest and best known proponents of rationalism; René believed the idea behind mathematics could be attained by reason alone without the need of any sensory experience thus, rationalism is
…show more content…
In spite of all those differences, the three types of knowledge can be compared against each other; ultimately however, rationalism stands above as the winner and therefore, the better category of knowledge against empiricism and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. In David Foster Wallace’s 2005 Commencement Speech “This is Water,” he talks about a default setting, which is something people do automatically. It is the concept of going through life without actually considering what is going on around you.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe our society is correct, even though knowledge can still cause disputes, I think having the knowledge helps much more than not having it. “Both societies think that knowledge is important to have and control.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the work, of Frederick
Douglass, Learning to Read and Write, not only the importance, of reading and writing has been emphasized, but also the process of enlightenment, and the ability to think on different lines, after learning how to read and write. The new information translated into knowledge, by the slave, which gave him new perspective and helped him re-understand, more appropriately, new realities, which he never fully understood before. Generally, we see no difference between information and knowledge, in other words, to most of us, information and knowledge are one or same thing. However, when we go in detail, we learn that there is an evident difference, between information and knowledge, which is slightly very subtly discussed in Learning to Read and Write. (Douglas) Knowledge, as discussed above, is translation, of information, through various processes.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justifying belief and what is knowledge’s nature and scope is well defined by the philosophical stance of “naturalized epistemology” in that knowledge comes from the empirical sciences though it’s application of theory, methods and results. Knowledge comes from proving things. This is different from the classical foundationalism which asserts the need to basic belief from which other beliefs can be built on. This essay will discuss the distinctiveness of naturalized epistemology, then how it differs from classical foundationalism and conclude with why it is referable. It should be noted that both systems of knowledge have many variations and so this short essay is more a general discussion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Blind Lake Analysis

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Robert Charles Wilson in his book Blind Lake, “Understanding is better than ignorance. Ignorance, unlike life, unlike narrative, is static. Understanding implies a forward motion, thus the possibility of change.” (Wilson, 263) Without understanding something, people would never learn anything. Without learning anything, people would become prideful believing that we know everything, when in reality, nobody knows everything.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Critique of Reason Through a Nietzschean Lens Reason has arguably been the driving force behind most popular philosophies since the peak of the Greco-Roman era thousands of years ago. The works of philosophers of reason, like Plato, who Nietzsche fervently critiques, have laid the groundwork for many of his ideological successors to proving reason to be the ultimate goal of all philosophy - a way to explain the unknown world and utilize knowledge as a means to quantify and qualify existence. Reason, no doubt, is critical to philosophical thought; however, it’s reached a point where the questions reason poses overpower intuitive and emotional philosophizing that favors a deeper understanding of oneself, one’s desires, and one’s relationship…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the philosopher ascends from the cave and sees the light, he understands things for what they really are. Plato argues that in doing this creates a responsibility to return to the cave and educate the people who remain there. Why, having left the cave and being introduced to the true forms of beauty, truth and good, does the philosopher return to the cave to educate who remain there? The philosopher needs to have some motivation that drives him to return to the cave for education. This is a key theme in understanding what the philosopher's role is in Plato's Republic.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is there such a thing like free will? Are human actions based on real human choices or there is something else hidden behind the whole world idea? How are these all related to determinism? Well, in the field of philosophy these questions are well known and wait for a possible correct answer without any results. Philosophers have been arguing all around the “free will” topic for a long time and discovered that there is not such a correct answer to explain and attest the validity of this conception.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Envision a world in which there was insufficient logical thought processes for the attainment of knowledge. For ages, humankind has struggled with the idea of how one obtains this knowledge, if for nothing more, than to learn efficiency in its acquisition. Without Descartes ' reasoned arguments of rationalism, Hume would not likely have been so inspired to formulate his counter argument of empiricist thought. Descartes defined his basic persona as a, "thinking being" more precisely; he stated famously, "I Think, therefore I am" (Dodson; Avery, 31). Hume acknowledged that rationalism is useful in certain contexts, and that it was an advancement of thought for its time.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the beginning “In the beginning,” the famous first words of the most sold book in the world. The purpose of this literature review is not to enforce any of the beliefs on how the universe and it 's inhabitants came to be, but merely provide the evidence that both sides have used in order to defend the beliefs of each side. Creation Creationism, the perspective that the universe and all it 's inhabitants were created out of nothing by God (Triune God), or at least by an intelligent designer (ID). There are three approaches to creation, biblical creationism, scientific creationism, and scientific biblical creationism. In biblical creationism approach, the word of Bible is the sole source used to defend creation.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Vs Descartes

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Question 1 In meditation 1 his whole goal was to rethink everything he has learned throughout his life and make sure it was all true. He decided to do this because there were somethings he had learned in childhood that he found out to be false later in life. Descartes decided to breakdown the simplest of opinions because he didn’t trust the way he came about the knowledge. He didn’t trust the way he learned it because he had learned most of his knowledge through his senses, but then he realized his senses could be deceived at any time.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke's Argument Against Innate Ideas

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Based on the idea that reason is helping to grasps ideas that are supposed to be innate and that some innate ideas are unknown leads us into a contradictory status and gives way to the third…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are three distinct types of knowledge that the rationalist might put forward as supporting his view and undermining that of the empiricist. First, the rationalist might argue that we possess at least some innate knowledge. We are not born, as the empiricist John Locke thought, with minds like blanks slates onto which experience writes items of knowledge. Rather, even before we experience the world there are some things that we know.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taking an example to show this, we cannot solve a Math problem just by the laws provided to us, there is a proper method in which we have to approach a problem to get to the solution and it can be understood only when we have seen or observed the proper method before hand. But it is important for us to learn about both Empiricism and Rationalism as these are the two extremeties of the propositions of how we gain knowledge and they allow us to check for ourselves that what fits in the situations we face…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays