New Penology Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
New penology is the ideology of the current parole making systems, with the beliefs that crime is just a part of life and we have to accept it and try to emphasizes the idea of managing people to prevent crime (Feeley, Simin, 1992 p.455). The new penology system accepts the notion crime is not something that can be removed from society, and tries to reinforce the idea of crime is just something that people need to be able to live with(Feeley, Simon, 1992. p.455). A big notion of the new penology is putting more of a focus on trying to patrol problem areas and target populations, with less of a focus on rehabilitation and more retribution(Feeley, Simon, 1992. p455). The idea of trying to help and change people under the new penology system is …show more content…
Also the efficiency of the system can help and along for more inmate to be helped out by the system, because being able to assess inmates though as series of questions and plug them into a computer always for more inmates to be processed. Another benefit of the new penology system is that since a computer is being used to determine the risk level of a inmate it removes any negative bias that could come from a correctional officer that they could have towards the person, or the persons, race, religion, culture, etc. With the ideology of being tough on crime and keeping people incarnated longer is a drain on many resources and research shows that longer sentences do not provide very much a of positive outcome (Goggin, Cullen, …show more content…
New penology ideologies have removed the notion of ever living in a crime less world, which is understandable unrealistic to live in a world without crime. Though it is important to understand and always be trying to reach for a goal and if that goal is just to try to mange crime and of certain populations and areas in hopes of reducing crime, the results are going to what they have been lately with lots of tension between police and citizens. Which should not be the case citizens should not be afraid to go the the police, because if they are they what is point of having police. The ideology of just trying to mange crime instead of trying to remove it needs to be changed in order to see more positive changes in our correctional faculties, and with our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As a police officer, I would say that a quality-of-life enforcement does not reduce future serious crimes, but increased police presence in high crime target areas does somewhat restore social order by acting as a visible deterrent to offenders. Before answering, I must say that I do not believe that zero-tolerance and quality-of-life policing are one in the same because zero-tolerance takes away the individual officer’s ability to show discretion, whereas quality-of-life enforcement, especially today, allows the officer to simply give a verbal warning, a Criminal Court Summons, or a Desk Appearance Ticket instead of the long-standing practice of 24-hour arrest to arraignment…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This role is a lot about peace, they want to keep peace like the crime-fighting role, but in the end, they don’t want to battle to be rewarded that peace. The police role has more focus on terrorism since 9/11. I don’t want to say that terrorism was not an issue in America before 9/11, but it was for sure not focused on as much as it now. Especially…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would mean that the application of this principles involves creating a kind of fear to people to prevent criminal activities in society. While this principle may be effective as it is, it also has been faulted by many. This is because creating fear among people would not be a sustainable way of mitigating criminal activities in the world. This is because it is only effective on a short-term basis. In this regard, people will not commit the crime not because it is wrong, but because they fear the consequences; they fear being arrested and displayed in a court of law.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sherrybaby Film Analysis

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Punishment in the form of incarceration is inevitable, especially in a society that tends to be tough on crime. However, how a person does after they have served their time is incredibly important and can be. The first step to helping ex-offenders is making people aware of the stigmatism that comes with having a record. People make bad choices in life sometimes, but they can also learn from them, and having a record shouldn’t affect the way you look at a person. The next, most important step, is changing policy and creating programs that will allow people previously incarcerated an equal chance to thrive in society to keep them from re-offending.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One reason is because this law, among may others, are not being enforced. People can break minor laws with no consequences, so they begin to think it is acceptable to do so. Another reason is because people are becoming more and more carless. They are beginning to think that laws to protect others don’t matter, if it doesn’t effect them. The combination of these two things result in more people breaking minor laws; which in some people’s eyes is wrong, because breaking minor laws only leads to more chaos in the future— for if people can break minor laws with no consequences, surely breaking major laws, such as grand theft, is…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second problem is that because the citizens are uninformed, they don’t pressure the police to fix the problems that problem-oriented policing would fix. The communities don’t understand that with the help of problem-oriented policing, the issues in their cities and neighborhoods could be fixed. The citizens think that policing is simple and straightforward; a crime happens and someone gets arrested and punished. Herman Goldstein stated in his article that “the public as a whole is woefully ignorant about the nature of the police function and the capacity of the police” (4). The citizens want traditional responses because they happen quickly.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peaceful protests have an important role in society in exacting positive change, and these weren’t what Judge Gullick criticized. He criticized extreme violence that transpired during the riots. Sentencing is a method used to deter some crimes more than others. The court would punish the worst offenders so harshly that a significant portion of the general public would be deterred to enact the violent acts that the punished committed. Peaceful protestors will either not be punished or they will be punished…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore the government should work towards punishing the criminals instead of eliminating causes of crime such as poverty Left realism Left realist believes that criminal is not influenced with nature. They agree with classic theory in the sense that crimes needs to have…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some hope is had when laws are being voted on to decrease the volume of population when it comes to prison. The belief that when someone breaks the law they need to be placed away society may not be wrong yet the way the countrey is executing it is. Crime will always be something that the country faces but the way it hands its criminal need to adjust to the problem at hand and not jump to incarceration as a solution. It is also the prisons job to handle the drug problem. If a country believes that a prison sentence is the solution to a drug crime then it need to keep what started the problem out of the hands of people with a addition.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deterrence is the Utilitarian approach to punishment and could justify the moral argument for the punishment of offenders. The belief is that there is a certain system that is designed to deter criminal behaviour and that crimes must be dealt with robustly. There are two main types of deterrence, individual and general deterrence. Individual deterrence is concerned with the offender itself in committing criminal acts and the psychological thinking as opposed to general deterrence which is a message aimed at the wider community or public (Scott and Flynn, 2014). Preventing future crimes through punishment was an idea that developed from the respected works of Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics