Advantages Of A Republican Form Of Democracy

Decent Essays
I believe that the republican form of democracy is a better form of government than the direct form of democracy. This is because the republican democracy is more efficient and precise. The job gets done rapidly and the people receive a more relaxing life and this will make the community more joyful overall.

In a direct democracy, the people would be in voting booths all day just waiting and sitting voting on every issue. This would make the people more stressed. The people are not perfect and since we form the government, neither is the government. Direct democracy always ends in people wanting to become more popular and better than others. Riots can occur, the government could completely corrupt, complex accountability will be drawn, and the lack of public interest. On the other hand, there are some good things about direct democracy. Such as, freedom, represents the people, better governance due to transparency, and respect of human rights. An advantage would be that the problem would have more views from the people and it will make the decision more precise and fair to the people.

Whereas, in a republic democracy, the people would be much more relaxed. There would be less commotion and this will make the people feel like they don’t have to worry about everything. This form of government gives freedom, rules, and rights. This
…show more content…
But, the most important similarity between a direct democracy and a republican democracy is that in both the people have a say/have rights as to the solutions to problems. This is the main trait of any democracy that separates it from other forms of government. Whereas, the most important difference between a direct democracy and a republican democracy is that in a direct democracy each person directly votes on every issue. Whereas, in a republican democracy, the representative will vote on legislation for the people based on what they may

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Bostonistan Case Study

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A stable democracy typically is better off financially, less likely to go to war and better positioned to fight corruption. This is why states across the globe stride toward a democracy and depending on circumstances fail. For example, Bostonistan and Germany, established democracy, but due to divided parties and gridlock this form of government was no longer acceptable. There is no variation of democracy that ensures success, however it will triumph when the right systems align with the citizens ' values and states history. From there the Government’s commitment to root out corruption, abandon failed old practices, and take account public interest will lead to a steady successful state.…

    • 2073 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. B.C.: This mean before Christ and relates to democracy because it was formed in 508 B.C. 2. B.C.E. :…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Big Republic Essay During 1787, when the Constitution was written, framers sought to create a government in which power was limited so that the people’s liberty would not be threatened. As a result of many debates and discussions, many framers believed that a republican government would abate the threat of tyranny and would grant power to the people instead of a democratic government. A democracy (democratic government) is a form of government in which the power of the majority rules. A republic (republican government) is a form of government in which the people and elected representatives rule according to the law.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is more effective than a direct democracy, in which the people who make up a faction would be able to directly influence government. Representation dilutes factions. Elected officials are less likely to negatively impact legislation due to their identification with factions because it simply is not possible for them to single-handedly pass a law. Given the idea that factions cannot be destroyed without also destroying liberty, the best way to control them is to allow the republican form of government to vote them out. Diversity…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This will benefit Australia by giving it independence as country and nation, allowing it to grow on its own, without constantly being under the Queen. Becoming a republic will allow us to have our own head of state, who knows Australia, rather than a queen who lives in a different country. Since the first settlers arrived the Australian people have constantly been growing and forming their own identity, culture, beliefs and values which are different to those of the people in other countries. Australia is already a nation with its own identity, which can only grow stronger if given the chance to become a republic. It is also believed that the ARM 's goal of democratic engagement when choosing the presidential election method is vital if Australia were to become a republic, rather than the 1999 example when people had no choice in this.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When looking at both the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution, in general they might look similar due to the fact that they were both created for the same reason. Although, if you examine both documents closely, the difference in details begin to become apparent. The Articles of Confederation is “the first basis for the new nation’s government” (pg 64), therefore, there are bound to be similarities between the current Constitution of the United States since they were both crafted with the general idea of creating a democratic government. Despite being similar in many aspects, many differences do exist, for as the times change, the U.S. Constitution has to be ratified in order to keep order within our nation.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Personally, I do not think that single party governments are very representative for the country but of course, it does have its advantages. Furthermore, I do conceive that the more parties the government have the better as long as it is not too…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A comparison of the Athenian and Roman governments demonstrates that the Athenian Limited democracy is the more effective type of government because citizens have more of a say in government, the Roman Republic has many risky outlets for greediness for power, and the Romans had no way of dealing with oppositional factions. Citizens had more say in government. They were able to be in the Athenian Assembly, which held power like making laws, passing laws, conducting political trials, and electing government officials. Even the poorest citizens had equal opportunities and this is very important because people can express their opinions clearly by proposing laws on their own. All citizens, which was limited to natural born males complete with…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers of America was once asked the question, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a Republic or Monarchy?” He responded, “A Republic, if you can keep it.” The United States of America is undeniably a Republic. The people have the power to elect representatives to be a voice for them. To clarify, the people have power.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College If there was in place a system that has not failed in its purpose of transitioning power in a peaceful way for over 200 years would you think it prudent to replace said system? I believe you should not, but that's exactly what some people want to do. Replacing it with a direct democracy straying the election process away from its constitutional republic design. Being, in turn, the whole design of the American government.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voting System In Canada

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our current representative democracy gives citizens the right to vote under a free electoral system. Frequently seen as right rather than an obligation, not all citizens take part in the election. Therefore, not making an appearance can dramatically effect our political system causing an unfair election. Other countries to avoid unfair democracy have obtained for compulsory voting; eg. Brazil, Australia and Austria.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The three branches of government are The Judicial branch, The Legislative branch and The Executive branch. • The legislative branch has two house and they are the senate and the house of representative. The houses of senate consist of 100 senators and only two senators are assigned to each state.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is democracy? Democracy to me means freedom. Freedom to pick and choose the lifestyle I want to lead in life. The freedom to be able to follow any religion I please and marry whoever I choose. Also the freedom to own property and choose where to live.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes down to it direct and representative have more differences than similarities. Some of the few things that they have in common is voting, which plays a large part when it comes to letting citizens have a say in their government. One of the biggest consequence, both governments suffers is risk of corruption. In a direct democracy, citizens do not have much of a say. Not only that, but those elected do not have to fulfill any promises made before being elected.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The best form of government for a society is the democratic system. Most people will agree with me, because it is the form of government that presents greatest strengths and benefits to the Human Being, but also present certain dangers, such as that depends on the opinion and participation of the most. How can this be a disadvantage? Well, if the majority is not adequately prepared to think freely and reflectively, this will be the first step to destroy the best system of government today. That is why I think that Rousseau in the Social Contract expresses the Best Form of Government.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays