Pros And Cons Of Opportional Voting

Improved Essays
There are multiple causes for concern regarding voting within this country. Our electoral system has a majoritarian rule system. This basically means that “Majoritarian Rule is a winner take all system; the party that obtains more votes wins under majority rules. On the other hand, proportional representation results in a more balanced sharing of political power” (Kartal, 2015). According to CNN, only 55.4% of all eligible voters turned out to vote in the last presidential election that is still technically being settled. For someone who considers themselves to be civic minded, this certainly throws up some red flags. With 44.6% of eligible voters not bothering to vote during a presidential election cycle, this leads me to believe that there …show more content…
With majority rules, some of the elections can be seen as unfair because you can get 51% of the vote and 100% of the representation, this is not the case with proportional representation. In a proportional representation, the votes that are cast will transform into seats won for each political party. This means that “Seat bonuses for larger parties are minimized, and small parties can have their voice heard in the legislature” (ACE Project Staff, 2006). Another advantage is that people no longer feel as though they have wasted their vote on a losing candidate, because as long as the candidate or party meets the required threshold then someone with a similar ideology will be representing them within the legislature. By allowing more minority parties to participate in a legislature, this makes the legislature as a whole more inclusive and balanced. If a legislature is more inclusive and balanced, it is believed that this will allow the policy that comes from the legislature to become more stabilized. “The Western European experience suggests that parliamentary proportional representation systems score better with regard to governmental longevity, voter participation, and economic performance” (ACE Project Staff, 2006). Single-transferable vote also allows for voting between parties and candidates within parties. This …show more content…
Personally, if it were up to me as a choice between majority rule or proportional representation, I would select the proportional representation. Unfortunately, the system that we have established in the United States on the local and state level for the most part is majority rule. I feel that a proportional representation electoral system would make the local and state legislatures more effective and a better representation of the electorate. I also feel that our current system is not very welcoming to smaller minority parties because the larger parties feel that the minority parties are not viable and thus just takes votes away from the larger parties. Unfortunately, to implement a proportional representative electoral system in the United States would take a constitutional amendment to achieve on a federal level. However, a proportional representative electoral system seems more practical on a local and state level because in some states it would only take the repealing of some laws to materialize a proportional representative electoral

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of proportional representation is to eliminate wasted votes and give representation to political parties in proportion to the votes they receive. This will essentially remove the issue of unfair representation that originates from partisan gerrymandering. They key to eliminating partisan gerrymandering from Texas elections is to adopt the large multimember districts used in PR…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are three reasons why the founding father created a bicameral Congress. The first reason was a matter of historical precedent. British Parliament had two houses an upper chamber, the House of Lords, filled with representatives of the aristocracy, and a lower chamber, the House of Commons, filled with representatives of the ordinary people. The second reason the framers' emphasis on the idea of checks and balances. By dividing legislative power between the House and the Senate, the two chambers would serve as checks against each other's authority, preventing a major tyranny.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As this alternative considers the votes of all persons voting, it elects whichever candidate has the most votes overall. This system clearly elucidates any misconstruction of its democratic status, unlike the Electoral College, which fails to do so. The Popular Vote would eradicate this trivial standpoint that most states hold and evolve it into that of equal ability as these “swing” states have. One could also describe this change as a leveling of the playing field. Washington Post (2013) predicts, “This system applied nationally would give Republicans a built-in advantage because it would dilute the influence of highly concentrated urban voters, who tend to vote Democratic in large numbers.”…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States was founded on the basis of representative democracy. We vote officials into office that we trust to make legislation for the people. They do their best as leaders to take into account the wants and needs of the constituents. Although many people feel as if the use of direct democracy can help the constituents be happy and get what they want. However, the use of ballot initiatives are not the best option due to the fact that they will result in a mess in the American political system.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College Essay

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This system still allows for small rural states to have an impact and creates more competitive elections in strong red or blue states. An example would be the 2008 election where Barack Obama won one electoral vote in Nebraska, which allowed the group of people that voted for him in that district to have their votes actually count. This isn’t a perfect system as minority citizens in certain districts will still have votes that don’t count, but it is a much fairer system that still protects small rural states. Also for this system to be fair someone independent from the elections should draw the district borders to stop…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I believe this is the best because it has the most benefits to it in regards to fairness and non-biased. The parties get to discuss thoroughly together the bills and with more people in rule in the government, they can weigh out the pros and cons more efficiently and propose any amendments that might be of the people’s interest. In conclusion, majority, minority and coalition governments all have their benefits and limitations in regards to the policy making process. As discussed above, each type of government system suits different countries.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States electoral system permits constancy and permanency in our nation due to serving as a way of checks and balances. Our system of government is divided into separate powers in order to ensure that all results are reasonably and fairly considered and accepted throughout the common ground. The electoral system is formatted in such a way that it allows for some securities for alterations to take place in order to keep a democratic stance while possessing stability of the political entities in mind as well. Despite sounding that it has a good system of operation, the electoral system has its pros and cons. However, The Constitution has regulated a fair system splitting it up into two senators per state and founding the House of…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Lord Bryce paper it gives an example of how in 1884 New York had thirty six electoral votes, and Mr. Cleaveland of the Democratic party carried a list with a majority of 1100 out of 1,100,000, so he won all of the thirty six electoral votes. The votes of the people who voted for Mr. Blaine were completely lost. Even though some people believe that the best option would be for a popular vote that would utterly give each candidate the percentage of the votes that were casted for them I personally believe that the take all method of the Electoral College is better. The states and people are protected with another source of representation that will represent each individual state for the benefit the majority of the population within each state. With the Electoral College the interests of minorities become evidently important.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    We base the election solely off of popular vote the problem with this is that is does not provide a clear winner, it is easy to rig and would often be in need of a national recount. Other alternatives are to redistribute the electoral votes so that there is 1 electoral vote for every 500,000 people this would make it so everyone's vote was equal but would also make is so small states had practically no power. We make all the states like Maine and Nebraska, in those states they divide the votes by what percent each candidate get instead of a winner takes all system for example if a candidate get 40% of the votes the get 40% of that state's electoral votes. We could also add 102 electors (2 per state and D.C.) these would be awarded to the candidate who wins the popular vote.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Voice Of America in Chains Voting is a large part of what America is today. “Government of the people, by the people, for the people”. The voice of the people is what makes the big decisions in America and mostly through choosing who will represent us in our government in elections. This makes the vote valuable, because it has the power to make decisions and change outcomes. Although many will argue that Mandatory voting will provide a better representation of the Consensus, it will actually demote civic virtues and limit individual freedoms.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This system has each and every vote count from every single person and who ever wins that majority, wins the election. The downside to this would be that if a recount was needed, the entire nation would needed a recount which would be more difficult. America's best interest would be to change the voting system to the Instant Runoff method. This method would be most effective for Americans because it would have everyone votes considered and the most popular would win.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Time To Vote Essay

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many people have busy schedules and do not have time to physically go and vote. Adults do not have much free time compared to young people. Nowadays, Americans work more hours than in the past. In fact, a lot of them work more than 80 hours per week. That makes it hard for them to find a spare time to vote.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (History Central) Second is that any other system would be just as flawed as the Electoral College. This is expressed through the District method and the Proportional voting system as stated previously. The greatest faults in those two systems is that with the District method.. The most concerning flaw with Proportional voting is that smaller populated states would have virtually no power to the election outcome when compared to their larger more populated states counterparts.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although compulsory voting has not been implemented in many democratic governments, those that have adopted its method show very high voter turn out. Since 1924, Australia has been a leading example of how efficient mandatory voting can be when implemented properly. Mandatory voting has many benefits that would not only aid the political system of ones country, but also countless other factors such as economics, foreign policy, and the general will of the people. Obama has even considered instituting this type of policy in the very free and democratic United States of America stating, “…mandatory voting would empower these groups and counteract the influence of big money in elections…”[Josephine Tovey]. With a compulsory voting law in place…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mandatory Voting Essay

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compulsory Voting Believe it or not, fifty-seven and a half percent of Americans voted in the 2012 presidential election. That is a little over half of all Americans that are eligible to vote; so many ask, what about the other half? The top three reasons people do not vote is because they are too busy and have a conflicting schedule, illness or disability, or simply because they lack interest. Voting is important, after all the end result is the leader of the United States or maybe even your local government. Compulsory voting, also known as mandatory voting, is a system in which voters are required to register to vote and to go to their polling place or vote on election day.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays