Political parties function as a mode for which politicians can identify with a group that represents certain ideologies or certain citizen demographics. One-party dominance can greatly determine outcomes of elections and forcefully shape the …show more content…
Two disadvantages of one-party government are internal dissent and disenfranchisement of citizens. Just because a particular party may be the majority does not mean that all of its members are in complete harmony concerning their ideologies or policies they want to see implemented. Often times there are defectors within the camp due to the emergence of a particular candidate up for leadership or a particular policy of which there is disagreement. This internal dissent is evidenced by the recent presidential elections, although it did not affect the outcome, there was some disturbance within the Republican party when Donald Trump became the presidential nominee. The same thing happens within our state elections and many time leads to spilt ticket voting. Whenever a single party becomes splintered, the party needs to keep factional disputes under control, or risk losing voters to the other party. Which brings me to the second disadvantage of a one-party government, the disenfranchisement of citizens. In addition to the dissent within the party, the external opposition to the party still exist. The minority party, which in most cases, represents the individuals that do not identify with the dominant party often have their needs or desires unmet. If the dominant party does not rule well, the disenfranchisement of a political group can only go on so long before there is a breakdown in civility. This often leads to much contention between both the popular political parties as well as citizens of the state. A one-party government has two options: either they listen to the public and continue winning offices, or they don't and face losing