Advantages And Disadvantages Of Texas Government

Improved Essays
Texas government where one party controls both houses of the Texas State Legislature and the governorship are responsible for causing divisions in society by being "too partisan" or representing too many diverse interest, because they do not stand for anything. Being a one party, Texas cause people to live with consequences by segregating a way of life, because of how like-minded people are. This causes political problems, because there is no understanding for people who cannot conceive this lifestyle.
Political parties function as a mode for which politicians can identify with a group that represents certain ideologies or certain citizen demographics. One-party dominance can greatly determine outcomes of elections and forcefully shape the
…show more content…
Two disadvantages of one-party government are internal dissent and disenfranchisement of citizens. Just because a particular party may be the majority does not mean that all of its members are in complete harmony concerning their ideologies or policies they want to see implemented. Often times there are defectors within the camp due to the emergence of a particular candidate up for leadership or a particular policy of which there is disagreement. This internal dissent is evidenced by the recent presidential elections, although it did not affect the outcome, there was some disturbance within the Republican party when Donald Trump became the presidential nominee. The same thing happens within our state elections and many time leads to spilt ticket voting. Whenever a single party becomes splintered, the party needs to keep factional disputes under control, or risk losing voters to the other party. Which brings me to the second disadvantage of a one-party government, the disenfranchisement of citizens. In addition to the dissent within the party, the external opposition to the party still exist. The minority party, which in most cases, represents the individuals that do not identify with the dominant party often have their needs or desires unmet. If the dominant party does not rule well, the disenfranchisement of a political group can only go on so long before there is a breakdown in civility. This often leads to much contention between both the popular political parties as well as citizens of the state. A one-party government has two options: either they listen to the public and continue winning offices, or they don't and face losing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College Abolish

    • 1518 Words
    • 6 Pages

    By getting rid of the Electoral College would bring the problems of those that with money could run and win even though they may not be the best candidate to run the country. It is a scary thought of some millionaire taking control of the country and just causing so many problems because they have only a single thing they want to do and no guidelines to stop them from causing those problems. It would be nice to have Independents represented better in the system it is a known system that keeps the crazies out. Most people know about who Reagan was and Carter was but not really Anderson. Anderson was Independent who got very little support compared to the others (Document B).…

    • 1518 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although I do agree with some opinions against the system when they state that it is not an equal manner in which to represent every individual vote in this country. The winner-take-all aspect that most states use prevents diversity and the recognition of the minority of that state. This is a major issue since most states are fastened to one party. On the other hand, I do agree with how the Electoral College prevents the voting of presidents by people who do not really know much about the candidates they are voting for. Sometimes people vote with their emotions, or even sometimes buy into propaganda.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How would you feel if your vote in deciding the next president of our country didn’t matter? Well, this is true for many people due to our broken Electoral College system of voting. I strongly feel that we should get rid of it for many reasons. My first reason is that it doesn’t give equal representation to certain states. My second reason is that it doesn’t match up with the popular votes that were taken by the people.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Congress is currently controlled by the Republicans, but not enough for a supermajority, so gridlock is very possible due to Congressional makeup. There is also gridlock in the design; the founders were frightened about the general public, so they made it harder to elect officials when the public is unable to elect directly officials and vote on policy, it creates gridlock because the elites have to argue over what is best. Also, they way elites act create gridlock because they are always making choices under the rational choice theory with the motive also to become reelected. Finally, because Congress has the power to create informal rules it leads to unconventional rules that elites use to pass or deflect policy. As a result, these rules block legislation resulting in gridlock.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that it is a very inefficient way to run our government. At least in our Mock Congress, the Republicans voted for the Republican bills, and the Democrats voted for the Democratic bills. If you wanted a member from the other party to vote for you, you had to either trick them or bribe them, and that is not how our government should be ran. This was both an unnecessary obstacle and a frustration for me. I was surprised to see some members who voted for individual bills instead of just for their party, though.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Extended Republic

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The election of these representatives would take place in their own districts, and they would be held responsible for properly conveying the concerns of their constituents to the larger body. Though this seems fair and equal, there was the fear that the citizens would not really know their leaders well enough. In such a large nation, there would be very few people who were recognized by the entire nation, and the Anti-Federalists were afraid that it would be these same people who ended up getting elected each time to lead the people. This would create a “natural aristocracy” where those elected would be truly unlike those who were voting for them (Storing 17). While it is true that the first few leaders tended to be those who were prominent for their role in shaping the country, it was a largely unfounded fear.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This system favors some citizens over others, which denies some people their choice of president. There is no proper distribution of the vote. Lots of presidents, like President Bush, lost the majority vote but won the electoral vote. As Edwards states, “…’proper distribution’…This claim is nonsense.” Direct voting would increase turnout. Because the citizens would know their vote would actually count for…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Causes Of Primaries

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The data gathered in this article can also suggest other major causes of polarization. If the political elite had the greatest sway over the candidates, there would be very little turnover because most candidates would have no reason to be ousted except when they were removing themselves from their party. In this case, a low level of turnover could be expected regularly. Similarly, if the electorate base had the most influence in who was elected, a moderate level of turnover could be expected regularly in primaries. In times of scandal, a very low level of turnover could be expected, as more incumbents would be defeated in re-election.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Texas governor is the Head of State, but he is relatively weak because he shares power with the other members of the executive branch and they are not subordinate to the governor, so they might have conflicting agendas. I think that operating like this, the Texas’ executive would not be able to address the people’s needs and interests in an effective way because the members might just waste time by fighting each other. However, this system promotes participation because most members are elected by the people and there are more officials to listen to them. There are many differences between the federal government and the Texas government, and I think that, overall, the federal government does a better job at protection the people’s interest and promoting public…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College Unfair

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This means that the representative chosen to vote in the electoral college must represent the popular vote or the values that the state holds. Most of the time this is what happens, but sometimes, like with Al Gore & Bush, they can lose the electoral college because the representative voted differently to the state vote. Unfortunately, this seems unfair but sometimes it could be for the better. Truth is, there are many people who go out and vote for someone or something that they are completely uneducated about. Per say, someone could go out and vote for someone without knowing how that candidate feels about certain education issues, gun control reforms, foreign policy issues etc.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays