Advantages And Disadvantages Of Nuclear Essay

Improved Essays
NUCLEAR
The application of nuclear is one of the most important invitations in modern. It is real the product of human development. But important inventions always have advantages and disadvantages. Even though nuclear weapons and nuclear energy have been changed our life a lot and made a deep influence. But at the same time, it also made a lot of series problem to human.
When we look at the nuclear, the first thing we can think about is war. The first time nuclear weapon’s power appeared and shocked the world was in second war. In order to accelerated the end of the second war. August 6th and 9th 1945, The United States dropped atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This event killed at least
…show more content…
The nuclear pollution poses a serious threat to the people’s health. The nuclear weapons can killed a large number of people. But more people died of illness that caused by radiation. The nuclear radiation brought them suffering not only in physical, they still suffered the pain that lost loved ones in mental. According to statistics, in second war, about 70000 to 80000 of Hiroshima’s 350000 residents were killed by the blast, and many suffered long-term illness from radiation. Also after Fukushima disaster, water containing levels of radioactive iodine far above the legal limit. Excess iodine will increase the rate of thyroid cancer. “104 of the area’s 300000 young people who were under 18 at the time of the disaster have been diagnosed with thyroid cancer.” (Anastasia Pantsios 2014)⑥ The nuclear radiation even affected the future of a …show more content…
If we can not use it in right way, it will become a disaster to world. Because it is impossible to ask human leave it, nuclear has been played an important part in our life. How to use it in right way is the most important problem. First, forbid to use nuclear weapons if the war happens. So that, the countries which have nuclear weapons must to limit them. We all know, it will be a disaster to normal people if use it like the second war in Hiroshima. Second reduce nuclear weapons. At any time nuclear power is the biggest threat in the world. Defend country can not be the reason to research nuclear weapons. Third try to develop it can be benefit to humans. As a new energy, it is still have great room for development. If nuclear can be used reasonable, it will have a large change in the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear weapons have horrific effects, massive explosions, radiation, severe burns. For example, during the second world war when America threw a nuclear bomb on Japan(August 6 the first bomb on Hiroshima city in Japan and on August 9 of Nagasaki ).The development of nuclear…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This radiation is extremely deadly and occurs during the initial bright flash of light that accompanies a nuclear explosion. It is estimated that twenty percent of the deaths in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were due to prompt radiation. Other than this, residual radiation and fallout also played a part in the deaths of so many people. Many people also died due to flash burns caused by the bombs and the excruciating heat of the explosions. This explosion caused multiple people suffering, including Mr. Yamaguchi, who was present at both explosions and survived both.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the weeks after the bombing, thousands of people would die from radiation poisoning due to the fact that atomic bombs emit massive amounts of radiation. In the days following the use of the first atomic bomb the United States pleaded with Japan to surrender and start rebuilding. However, the Japanese would not give up the fight even after such a massive loss. this showed Truman that he could not hold back any longer and decided to send in a second atomic bomb to destroy a second Japanese city. The second atomic bomb was to be dropped on the Japanese city of Nagasaki and like the first atom bomb, would kill tens of thousands of people.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1943 an Italian Physicist, Enrico Fermi, created a chain reaction that changed the course of history. The U.S started the Manhattan project in fear of if the Germans got the atomic bomb first that they would use it for the wrong cause. There were two bombs that were dropped in World War II. Both were built and dropped by the U.S. The United States dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The medical community has a great influence on informing citizens that nuclear weapons should be banned. The medical community cannot support the hundred of millions of people that are injured from a nuclear war. The medical community could possibly lose most of their work force, as many employers would be killed from the explosions. There is also a history behind nuclear wars. The first nuclear, or atomic, bombs were deployed on Hiroshima.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atom Bomb Effects

    • 1368 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the late 1930s and into the WWII era, the Manhattan Project allowed the U.S. government to enrich uranium and to then create a bomb, initially called The Gadget”, that could destroy an entire city with the immense power it released. During this period in human history, it now became possible for a single bomb to annihilate the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. More so, the radioactive aftermath of these bombings took a heavy toll on the overall health of human environments, which did not discern between civilian and military actors within the context of war. The invention of the atom bomb defined a horrifically new level of human weaponry, which challenged the ethical and moral role of the United States as a first world power after the defeat of the Japanese. During this time, David Lilienthal, the director of the Atomic Energy Commission in the 1940s, defines the effects of the use of atom bomb right after the war had ended: Then we burned Tokyo, not just military targets, but set to wipe out the place, indiscriminately.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The pacifist position argues that the use of nuclear weapons will always be morally wrong because: “1) their use will result in widespread noncombatant deaths and 2) the destructive effects of such weapons will necessarily be out of proportion to any political or military objectives achieved” (p.208). Yet, there are some objections against the pacifist position. First, an argument against the view that the proliferation of nuclear weapons it’s inevitable and will eventually escalate to nuclear war, is that since 1945 there is not a single case recorded with the use of nuclear weapons. Second, by taking this pacifist’s position…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another long-term effect caused by the introduction of the atomic bomb, arguably, is the beginning of the Cold War. The Cold War officially began in 1947 and was a confrontation nearly always conducted through “military surrogates” such as economic pressure, selective aid, diplomatic maneuver, and the technology rush. All of this was in order to avoid a direct confrontation that would have led to a nuclear war. Many say that the final shots of World War II, ‘Little Boy’ and ‘Fat Man’, where the first shots fired of the Cold…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other countries now realized that American forces had developed a weapon so powerful that it could not be beat. Hiroshima was devastated socially, politically and economically. Hiroshima was a city that had many hospitals and clinics. The bombing destroyed 32 of their health clinics and 18 of their hospitals. At the time of the bombing Hiroshima employed two hundred and ninety eight doctors.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People have different thoughts on if the U.S should retain or dismantle their nuclear arsenal. People that think it should be kept make arguments like how nuclear weapons help keep the U.S safe and how they can be used if there were to be any sort of war. On the contrary People that feel our nuclear weapons should be dismantled say our nuclear weapons cost too much to be kept and they make us seem hostile to other nations. So should the U.S keep its nuclear arsenal? Well there are lots of pros and cons to both sides of this argument.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays