A military intervention is seen as a set of tools and forms coercion of the conflicting parties to preserve or establish peace between them with the use of special forces, equipped with by means of armed struggle. The essence of military intervention lies in the effectiveness of violent impact on the conflicting parties. The effect of coercion of conflicting parties to establish peace with the military element is achieved by the application or threat of material damage, thus limiting their financial ability to maintain the armed struggle. Because of this, the military element is able to exert the most significant influence on the conflicting parties. But the huge drawback of the military element in keeping the peace is that its use is associated
…show more content…
The military intervention should not initially be made if it clearly can lead to conflict escalation or to greater human suffering than in the case of non-interference. This should be done everything possible to ensure compliance with the intervention of the international humanitarian law. However, the goals of intervention are not only to end the violence and restore order (Annan, 2003). A military success is not final, but only the initial stage of intervention. The main goal of military intervention, no matter which factor was a motivator the countries engaged in it, must be a halt loss of lives and the protection of human rights. The humanitarian considerations should be the primary motive for the use of force. And after the resolution, the invaders have to overcome social chaos, to change the environment and living conditions, reproducing in the country …show more content…
A rude behavior can be considered as a violation only to a certain category of human rights, in particular, those that are fundamental to ensure its existence. Mass character suggests the presence of a significant number of violations and the systematic – their frequency of occurrence or duration for a certain period of time. Such violations may be the result of acts or omissions of the state or a consequence of the collapse of the state and carried out in peacetime and during armed
The military intervention should not initially be made if it clearly can lead to conflict escalation or to greater human suffering than in the case of non-interference. This should be done everything possible to ensure compliance with the intervention of the international humanitarian law. However, the goals of intervention are not only to end the violence and restore order (Annan, 2003). A military success is not final, but only the initial stage of intervention. The main goal of military intervention, no matter which factor was a motivator the countries engaged in it, must be a halt loss of lives and the protection of human rights. The humanitarian considerations should be the primary motive for the use of force. And after the resolution, the invaders have to overcome social chaos, to change the environment and living conditions, reproducing in the country …show more content…
A rude behavior can be considered as a violation only to a certain category of human rights, in particular, those that are fundamental to ensure its existence. Mass character suggests the presence of a significant number of violations and the systematic – their frequency of occurrence or duration for a certain period of time. Such violations may be the result of acts or omissions of the state or a consequence of the collapse of the state and carried out in peacetime and during armed