The article of Acker (2004) and the article of Richards & Gelleny (2007) focus specifically on the effect globalization has had on gender …show more content…
This derives from a growing amount of female employees in the manufacturing zones. More recent studies show that women accept lower salaries, although the participation rate has increased. Also is stated is that women are less in control of the spending of their wages (Chambers, 2000, as cited in Gunter & Van der Hoeven, 2004). Acker (2004) states that the difference between work done by men and work done by women comes from a traditional division. In this view women are responsible for unpaid, reproductive labor. They are fulfilling positions with a lower salary and power than men. These gendered statements are modified into the present form of globalization. Therefore, unpaid labor for women seems to be justified (Acker, 2004). At this moment, women are represented in high positions. However, this phenomenon is still rare and most of them perform in some masculine way. Nevertheless, this may indicate that an economy dominated by males could be old fashioned soon. A new form of economy would be more represented by females. (Acker, 2004). At the same time, Standing (1999, as cited in Acker, 2004) argues that the jobs currently defined as feminine are low-paid, part-time, insecure and without benefits. Jobs related to multinational corporations result in a higher salary than the traditional domestic jobs. Therefore, the increased access for women to the workforce