Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Unified Government

Improved Essays
There are advantages and disadvantages of having a unified as opposed to a divided government. Generally, unified government describes that only one political party controls all other branches of government.
First of advantages of having a united government is, since the voters wanted a united government, they believes divided government interrupt the U.S. government based on the past facts of the United State government history. The most successful US governments and presidencies happened when they applied the united government. That is why, just as surely, unified government offers the successful checking system that needs to check only one party, also it might helpful to keep the strong president power that president is able to control
…show more content…
Be prepared to give a comprehensive answer to each question they will be worth 15 points each, one page.

1. Compare and contrast the delegate model of representation and trustee model of representation. Which of the two do you consider more democratic? Why? Which better reflects reality? Why?
There are two types of basically different representation with the different legislative outcomes, the delegate model of representation and the trustee model of representation. First, both the delegate and the trustee of political representation position to compete and inconsistent requests on the act of representatives. The delegate means a representative who considers his voters, listens, records their ideas, and then repeats their opinions no matter what kind of legislative branch he belongs to it. On the contrary, the trustee means a representative who listens to his voter’s ideas, takes those ideas as seriously, and then tries to activate and follow that opinion by himself. Moreover, during trustee notions of representation want representatives to obey and follow their own decision about the proper step of actions, the delegate beliefs want representatives to obey and follow their voters’

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The late 1700s were a time when the United States was trying to figure out their best form of government. During the late 1700s, many people were debating if the U.S. Constitution should be passed or if it should not. Many people argued that it did not benefit the majority of the people and that it only favored the rich. The ratification of the U.S. Constitution would have many positives that would outweigh the negatives that it would bring forward. Unification of the country is what the Constitution brought to the table.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “For the Articles’ idea of government consisted of one majority house of government called the Delegates and each state having one overall vote in decision-making. And when these votes came altogether they would determine the outcomes of certain situations,…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The separation of power also creates a checks and balances system which prevents one of the branches of government from having more power over another. Ultimately resulting in a equal or limited government. Without these systems limiting the government's powers and keeping it balanced the government would be controlled by a single group of people (tyranny). Our government today is a clear democracy run by our three branches united so I’d say our systems have ultimately create a balanced or limited form of government in the…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787, the New America had won her independence from England, yet a vacuum had been created which forced the need to form a new governmental system. This system would allow the people to rule themselves as well as protect their new nation from others. In response, two ideas of government were formed among the people. One group called themselves the Federalist who saw a need for a strong national government and the other group was called the Anti-Federalist who preferred for each state to rule and govern itself. As Brown and Shi state, a “fierce political debate that ensued, advocates of the new Constitution assumed the name Federalists.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The emotional and dramatic debates of 1787 initiated an event turning change in the structure of the United States government. The passion of James Madison’s ambition to create an equally powered federal government through the division of government branches have set foot to what the modernized American system is seen today. Rakove elaborates in great detail of the trials and errors which the delegates of the 1787 Convention had to endure. However, without the strenuous debates, contemplating opinions, and theoretical views of the Virginia Plan delegates against the New Jersey Plan delegates, the American nation would fail to stand on the strong values of equal government power. From the various attempts to create an organized federal government power and Constitution, the intentions of the delegates of the 1787 Convention were centered upon the values of theory and philosophy rather than…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny. It was what the colonists of America were escaping when they left Britain. A tyrannical government is infamous for completely revoking the rights of the people. This is why the Framers wrote the Constitution. They did everything possible to create a government that would protect the people’s rights.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, why we as American citizens are bound to uphold our constitution? Second, have we had an opportunity to express our views on our constitutional system? Third, how has the constitutional system served our democratic values? Dahl uses the eight chapters in his book to offer plausible answers to the questions he proposes. Dahl begins by outlining the historical roots of the constitution.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. Divided Government: A divide government can be defined as one party controls the White house and another party controls one or both houses of Congress. A divided government is when the president and one or both of the houses Congress are ultimately controlled by two different parties. Different branches of the government are controlled by different political parties. Since, the different branches of government are able to check in on one another, this allows a way in which the views of one party are able to stall the action of the other party.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I believe this is the best because it has the most benefits to it in regards to fairness and non-biased. The parties get to discuss thoroughly together the bills and with more people in rule in the government, they can weigh out the pros and cons more efficiently and propose any amendments that might be of the people’s interest. In conclusion, majority, minority and coalition governments all have their benefits and limitations in regards to the policy making process. As discussed above, each type of government system suits different countries.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the reflections of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and the unsteady response associated with dealing with the historic disaster that his New Orleans gives way to thorough discussion the levels of responsibilities and role of the federal, state, and local authorities in times of disaster and emergency response to such disasters like Katrina. Under the systems or practice where more power is pushed to the federal government to spearhead and to always play the lead role is not a good idea and Katrina exposed the truth in that. In as much as federalism exist, Homeland security and the disaster management organization should operate or response to national disasters and not just act on federal missions. Before, Hurricane Katrina made a land…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Constitution Flaws

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “If men were angels, there would be no need of government.” -James Madison. Unfortunately, because men are not perfect and rather flawed, our country has government, and more specifically, our Constitution. Americans have abided by the Constitution for over 200 years, and if not for the great thought, time, and compromise that the founders put into this document, America might not have been the same.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Secondly, a strong national government can help achieve greater social, political and economical equality among its citizen. Also a strong national government is more likely to make foreign policy decisions that benefit the nation in comparison to a strong state government that prioritized the benefit of the state. A strong national Government can also provide unity among people; it enhances a strong sense of national pride and patriotism. On the other hand, there are also some disadvantages about…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    DBMF 405: Quiz One Answers should be written in one to three complete sentences. Each question is worth 5 points. There is no time limit in which to complete the quiz. According to Dr. Dobson, what is the relationship between panic and appeasement?…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Compared to the Presidential system, the Parliamentary system is more favourable to a healthy democracy. This essay will discuss the relationship between the Parliamentary and Presidential systems’ executive and legislative powers and the ways they differ from one another. Within the Parliamentary system, the executive and legislative powers are fused together to set and control the government (Mintz et al. 331-332).…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The transition to democracy for a new country has it’s foundations in what system it uses, and how well it uses it. This means that for countries such as Livonia, picking the correct system is critical in stabilizing and maintaining democracy as well as transitioning to a market economy. One must be objective and clear when it comes to reviewing which of the two options is best for Livonia. The criteria in which I will be evaluating both systems are as follows. Stability, as defined by how often the government is prone to change internally, and how prone the government is to collapse.…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays