Advantage And Disadvantage Of Falsifiability

Karl Popper defines falsifiability as the inherent testability of any given scientific hypothesis. Philosophy and science work together to work out the truths about our environment and the universe. These two fields are the elements of the advancement of knowledge and also in the development of human society.
Science uses experiments to get results to either verify or disapprove a certain hypothesis. Philosophy on the other hand is used to determine the factors of the validity of scientific developments. Philosophy determines the nature of science and influences the direction of research. If one theory is falsified, another theory is formed to replace and explain the new phenomena. Falsifiability might not be universally acceptable but it is one of the …show more content…
The idea of falsifiabilty in pure sciences is a useful in the generalization of theories that are both testable and also realistic. A scientific truth when a falsifiable theory is tested and the results are significant.
The advantage of this theory is that the truths can be falsified when more knowledge are available for a specific subject. The disadvantage of falsifiability is that it is strict and therefore it does not take into account that most sciences both observational and also descriptive.
Problems stemming from falsification include problems that stem from logical situations. Experiments and observations provide evidence which is faulty rather than being the law of theory. A scientific theory that is specific should contain complex statements as compared to single statements.
Furthermore, the theory will need augmentation by auxiliary assumptions which include laws that govern the use of any kind of instrument used. The validity which is tested by experimentation has to have conditions like description of the