Advancement Of Colored People Case Analysis

After reading Civil Rights and Liberties section on Eres, How the National Association of the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) started to fight against the Jim Crow laws in place during very tense beginnings of the civil rights movement. Outlining the findings in the Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954) with a unanimous decision. This in fact radicated the Jim Crow laws of “Separate but equal doctrine” (380), as the chief justice Earl Warren stated, “. . . A sense of inferiority affects the motivation to learn” (381). In the historic decision colored people were now in protection of the Fourth Amendment. The Decision ended segregation, which was in fact a spark for the Civil Rights Movement. Even after this ruling the courts could not desegregation “deliberate speed”, because of hostility and violence in the south. …show more content…
AZ (1966), Supreme Court decision was also a ratification of the Fourth Amendment that incorporated the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments. In the Miranda case found that such Amendments would be applied to the state and local level of the justice system. With the judges vote five to four where the judges argued, “. . . that individuals felt pressured to incriminate themselves in the absence of a lawyer's counsel” (377). In fact that changed the attitude of the police protocol, which introduction what is now known as the “Miranda warnings” or also known as the “Miranda Rights”. That we have the right to remain silence and not self incriminate ourselves. These two cases not only shaped history, but helped the fight for equality for