I will move forward under the notion of a wedding that is held in a church, and sworn in under oath on the biblical scriptures and promises made. During ceremony two people are sworn to unity, under the notion that you shall not commit adultery, read from the scripture. So that being the premise of your marriage you both come to the agreement, or make the promise,that this is not to be done. Morally it is wrong to commit adultery. Second stance is emotion, operating under the assumption that it is morally wrong to intentionally hurt someone or cause harm. By committing adultery you are not only hurting them but you are causing harm to their quality of life. So second grounds against adultery is the moral obligation you have to that person's emotion and quality of life. In conclusion. Adultery is morally impermissible to cause harm to someone intentionally, and exclude the emotion and promises you've …show more content…
Of course it is wrong to kill someone else because of a difference in views or sexual desires. We can all agree that it is morally wrong to do so. As she mentioned in the article it is a hate crime to kill someone under these circumstances. That being said, Janet Mock touches on the fact that if a transgender person is only sought after as a one night stand by a non transgender person, they are in no way obligated to tell that person, who seemingly takes no interest in knowing them there story and there sexcual