Websters dictionary describes evil as morally bad, wicked, sin, and a source of sorrow and distress. Good is defined as something of good quality, satisfactory, producing a beneficial effect, considerable, desirable, well behaved, virtuous, and kind. These are both ends of the spectrum of how people, objects, and even ideas are impacted.. These definitions are bold representations of how people have behaved in the past and present. Both acts of good and evil by the world’s people have impacted society in the past and present and should be balanced to have an equal society.
Good and evil have both played roles in our history. Social psychologists focus on the specific psychological processes that trigger aggression in specific circumstances. …show more content…
“As a youngster, Adolf's dream was to enter the priesthood”(Grobman 1) Even this feared leader began as a kind hearted young man. Hitler decided to pursue being a painter. He failed at this and entered politics, still with good intents. Hitler is seen as a communist leader, but early in his life he actually was in a group called the free corps who opposed communism.”The Free Corps was a paramilitary organization composed of vigilante war veterans who banded together to fight the growing Communist insurgency which was taking over Germany. The Free Corps crushed this insurgency.”(Grobman 1) After this his kind self fell victim to the traumatizing events of WW1. Being Austrian born when an Archduke was assassinated he began hating Serbians, which inflamed his hatred and sent him into his “evil” rise to power. In his politics he developed and refined his anti-semantic ideology as a direct result to a kind boy exposed to the true evil of this world.. When Hitler began the “evil” nazi party was just a few member group who opposed the big government in their town. They used aggression to attack a government building, which ended up putting Adolph into jail. Here he wrote his book, which really outlined his anti-semantic ideology and showed how hateful WW1 had made him. The Holocaust was a huge example of this
Good and evil have both played roles in our history. Social psychologists focus on the specific psychological processes that trigger aggression in specific circumstances. …show more content…
“As a youngster, Adolf's dream was to enter the priesthood”(Grobman 1) Even this feared leader began as a kind hearted young man. Hitler decided to pursue being a painter. He failed at this and entered politics, still with good intents. Hitler is seen as a communist leader, but early in his life he actually was in a group called the free corps who opposed communism.”The Free Corps was a paramilitary organization composed of vigilante war veterans who banded together to fight the growing Communist insurgency which was taking over Germany. The Free Corps crushed this insurgency.”(Grobman 1) After this his kind self fell victim to the traumatizing events of WW1. Being Austrian born when an Archduke was assassinated he began hating Serbians, which inflamed his hatred and sent him into his “evil” rise to power. In his politics he developed and refined his anti-semantic ideology as a direct result to a kind boy exposed to the true evil of this world.. When Hitler began the “evil” nazi party was just a few member group who opposed the big government in their town. They used aggression to attack a government building, which ended up putting Adolph into jail. Here he wrote his book, which really outlined his anti-semantic ideology and showed how hateful WW1 had made him. The Holocaust was a huge example of this