Problem Of Evil Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
The meaning of the word evil takes on many different forms, the most common is the concept of being morally wrong -negative behaviors-, bringing harm unto others and marked by bad events-such as a natural disaster- (Simple). The Problem of Evil consists of the idea that if there is a theistic God, then evil would not exist in the world. This is due to the fact that God is thought to be Omnipotent(all-powerful), Omniscient(all-knowing), and Omnibenevolent(all-good), which would mean that God would not have created a world in which evil lies. According to this idea, it would appear that a God with these traits would have eliminated evil on Earth, or would have made it so Evil did not exist at all. However, evil remains in the world, which causes …show more content…
“Part of the definition of libertarian free will that an action that is free in that sense cannot be caused by anything outside of the agent, not even God can cause a person to freely do what is right” (Tooley). If humans are thought to have free will, then God would have no ability to control their actions. This could result in evil being brought into the world due to negative actions being executed. This objection claims that premise 2 of the Problem of Evil argument could be false since it claims that God would have the ability to eliminate all evil which would not necessarily be true because God can only do what is logically possible. To eliminate all evil in the world God would have to take away free will from God’s creations and guide them in a positive direction. As far as human knowledge understands, humans do have free will, which means that God has no control over what their actions may be, evil or good. Therefore, a God that is Omnipotent or all-powerful would not be able to control God’s creations without taking away their ability to freely do as they …show more content…
Soul-building evils are evils in the world that help one build character and enhance their soul (Meister). This would mean that premise 4 of the Problem of Evil argument would be considered false, since even if God is all-good, God would allow evil into the world if it supported a greater good than the evil itself. “According to Hick, the divine intention in relation to humankind is to bring forth perfect finite personal beings by means of a "vale of soul-making" in which humans may transcend their natural self-centeredness by freely developing the most desirable qualities of moral character and entering into a personal relationship with their Maker” (Trakakis). Meaning that soul-making or soul-building helps humans grow as people and develop positive characteristics that give them a personal relationship with God. Mistakes are how people learn and without mistakes there would be no knowledge between right and wrong. An example of this would be a small child learning that if they hit someone there will be negative consequences, such as going to their room. This teaches the child not to hit others. Therefore, evil is needed in the world to help people grow as a person and be able to identify negative actions and how to avoid

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the logical problem of evil, it is made aware that three things must be true in the contemporary version layout for evil to exist. They are that God is all good, He is all…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If God truly wished the best for his children, then would it be wise to give people freedom of choice. The way Augustine explains free will, it is assumed that this would be a gift from God. Since he explains that evil is the absence of good, then how could our all loving God allow this. Would he not prevent this? If it is truly God’s will to let people have free choice of will and is not capable of truly making evil because he is all good, then it would only make sense that God would not tolerate evil befalling on his children, yet…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julian's Theory Of Evil

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The problem of evil is an atheistic argument, against the existence of God. It is a deductive argument that pits the existence of unjustified evil against the existence of any kind of divine being. Julian of Norwich presents a response to the problem of evil, but there are also some possible holes in Julian’s theory. This paper explores the problem of evil and how it is connected to human suffering, Julian’s theory in response to the problem, and a critique of Julian’s theory. One must assume that an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God exists.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Let’s call this premise, Premise 4. It states “In order for an action of yours to be free, you must have the ability to act otherwise” (Kane 24) which leads us to the second conclusion of The Consequence Argument which says “If determinism is true, then no one could have acted otherwise, therefore free will is impossible” (Kane…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will Response The theist says that God is defended by the problem of evil because God gave us human’s free will. It says that God is not responsible for the problem of evil because God gave the ability of free will to his people that way they can make their own mistakes and live their own lives. However God does control every aspect of your life he does allow free will so that way you can make your own choices and if those choices lead to God he will allow you into Heaven. He understands that you will make mistakes because we are sinful but that is why he sent his only son down to Earth to repay for those sins.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Exposition of the Problem of Evil In my paper, I will present the argument Weirob gives on the Problem of Evil, and explain Miller’s response to the Problem of Evil. I will explain why the character of Weirob argues it is impossible for an omniscient, omnipotent, and totally good God to exist simultaneously with evil in the world and go into detail about how Weirob believes that if God has these traits, He should be able to eliminate all evils in the world before they occur. Then I will give Miller’s defense to this argument which includes how God and evil can both exist in the world.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reichenbach, writes “creating persons who perform a very significant number of free acts and who thus might be appropriately termed free persons, God has made things which he subsequently cannot control”. So is there a limit over the control of people’s actions even if what they do is done out of pure evil or are we free to choose what actions to perform? Free will theodicy explains our human nature and our evolving world. As complex as times get from the very beginning to our current times we will always have to live together to survive and evolve into an efficient species. One way is creating an environment where we teach each other how to live on earth and prosper.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason that we even have an experience of perceived evil is because of the experience itself that .we have been through, meaning that; we can’t have “hot” without “cold” So I understand that what we believe is evil is just the opposite end of the of good. I am often confronted with the argument saying that evil shouldn’t exist if God really existed. The “problem of evil” means that the existence of evil is a needed condition for the existence of certain kinds of good things. There are a number of characteristics that are important only if evil exists in this world. Being compassionate, for instance, is a great value, but can only exist if there is suffering in this world.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason why we give this up is because getting rid of God being omnibenevolent would diminish the idea of him existing. Not only that, you can’t get rid of evil because evil actually…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arguments From Evil: Elliot Sober I. Introduction The reality of evil existing in our world has been questioned throughout time based on the argument that an all powerful, all knowing, and all good (all-PKG) God cannot coexist with evil. The problem of evil only appears when there is a PKG God because if God is all powerful, all knowing, and all good then how could there still be evil. Therefore, if one of those properties we removed then there would no longer be a problem because then God couldn 't prevent evil from happening.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, to say that God is in control of everything in the universe is hard to fathom. In saying so, one should take cognizance of the idea that some things do happen for no reason, that there is randomness in the universe. These pockets of chaos aren’t God’s handiwork, it’s simply the universe following the firm laws of nature, but every now and then, there are events that happen that seem to break outside the laws of nature. Nonetheless, this idea fails to understand that God has prerogatives that are unknown to…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil is not a problem unless it is directly related to the existence of God. The problem of evil is that if God exists he either allows evil to happen and is not the greatest most benevolent and righteous good, or he cannot stop it and is not all powerful. A direct response to the problem of evil is that God would not allow natural evil, such as hurricanes, or human evil, such as rape and torture. The idea of God is a being with ultimate power, ultimate good, and ultimate seer of the world. When we talked about the problem of evil in class, the indirect situation that stood out to me most was the one that was also in the book.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Augustine And Evil

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Epicurus was one of the first philosophers to consider the problem of evil and his question; “if He is both willing and able (to take away all evils), which alone is suitable to God, from what source then are evils? Or why does He not remove them?” , summarises concisely the issue which has been at the forefront of philosophical argument for thousands of years. To explore this question I will first consider what God is. In this essay I will refer to God in the orthodox monotheistic sense of the word as an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent being. Likewise, evil refers to all that is bad in the world.…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil exists because we chose it to. We, as free agents can choose between right and wrong. Through this we can justify our actions. What kind of world would we lead if everything was already decided for us and all we would have to do is perform it? God, although knows how we will choose, plays absolutely no role in our process of choosing.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pseudo-Dionysius-The Areopagite, one of the most influential and inspiring theologians and philosophers of our world today. The birth and death dates of Pseudo-Dionysius are unknown, but was considered to be between the late fifth century to the early sixth century. Most of Pseudo-Dionysius’ writings are presumably lost but, what was recovered of his work are of the most famous and well known in the Christian community and a great framework for philosophers and theologians. Among his great work and best known for is his writings on The Divine Names, Mystical Theology and Ecclesiastical Hierarchy. Pseudo-Dionysius was believed to be influenced by Maximus the Confessor.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays