The first reason why, Adnan’s trial is unforgivable because of the categorization about his very own case scenario. While going through his very own transcripts from his six-week trial, they were being forced to finish, he wasn’t only be able to try to put the evidence but also on his setting. Their very own analysis of the data couldn’t really be able to find any determined truthful evidence that is being showed at the case to propose that religion was actually motivated to the crime scene. The sources to Adnan’s unacceptable and faith were very persistent throughout the trial. Another, evidence that was starting at the trial that Adnan’s parents wouldn’t be able to accept his own dating ways. There’s an evidence that Adnan would protect his
…show more content…
In fact, it’s probably because there were other factors that is willing to be able to play a significant role. The evidence that was being presented that it was about the Anti-Muslim Prejudice was playing a role at different parts in Adnan’s case, from jury selection, when one of the juror were talking about that he couldn’t be fair to a Muslim that was being accused just because a Muslim friend of his would hurt his own wife, to a pledge hearing when a prosecutor keeps on referring to Adnan as a Pakistani (instead of American) and it can form to a pattern of cases where Pakistani’s will kill women and then they would go back to their own home country, which is very depressing. Alternatively, when another person, with no clear intention of lying, there are hard accusations that the ex-boyfriend of the cause of the murder, of course he will be a suspect, because it makes them a person of enjoyment. According to Conor Friedersdorf, “whether or not Adnan is guilty, it’s difficult to come away from this deep dive into his case without concluding that he would’ve gotten a fairer trial”(Serial Episode 10: The Best Defense is a good Defense). When the ex has no alibi, it can be even worse. The juries see that the Anti-Muslim Prejudice community as a role that should not be played, because it can cause abuse. When other Pakistanis harm their wife there would be a possibility that it can make you
In fact, it’s probably because there were other factors that is willing to be able to play a significant role. The evidence that was being presented that it was about the Anti-Muslim Prejudice was playing a role at different parts in Adnan’s case, from jury selection, when one of the juror were talking about that he couldn’t be fair to a Muslim that was being accused just because a Muslim friend of his would hurt his own wife, to a pledge hearing when a prosecutor keeps on referring to Adnan as a Pakistani (instead of American) and it can form to a pattern of cases where Pakistani’s will kill women and then they would go back to their own home country, which is very depressing. Alternatively, when another person, with no clear intention of lying, there are hard accusations that the ex-boyfriend of the cause of the murder, of course he will be a suspect, because it makes them a person of enjoyment. According to Conor Friedersdorf, “whether or not Adnan is guilty, it’s difficult to come away from this deep dive into his case without concluding that he would’ve gotten a fairer trial”(Serial Episode 10: The Best Defense is a good Defense). When the ex has no alibi, it can be even worse. The juries see that the Anti-Muslim Prejudice community as a role that should not be played, because it can cause abuse. When other Pakistanis harm their wife there would be a possibility that it can make you