Adnan Syed Case Study

In the world there is always minority being pulled over, accused and harassed because of how they look or their lifestyle by the police. Adnan Syed was accused of killing Hae his ex girlfriend and was sent to jail. While there was more evidence to be seen and others to be questioned threw the trial. This is why Adnan Syed deserves an appeal because the jury was biased, the cops singled in on him, and his lawyer was not thorough. During court the jury is not supposed to be biased to either side and give a fair trial. From jury selection, when one potential juror confessed that he couldn't be fair to a Muslim defendant because a “Muslim friend of his mistreats his wife, to a bail hearing when a prosecutor and referring to Adnan as a Pakistani (instead of American)”(Article 6 Right to a fair trial). In Adnan's trial i think it was unfair to have a jury that was biased and Muslim prejudice toward Adnan Syed not allowing him to have a fair trial threw the whole thing. This wasn't the only place he was singled on and wrongly accused. …show more content…
Because evidence shows that more criminal charges are filed against minorities, and minorities tend to be victimized by police brutality and is more often the result of police officers engaging in racial profiling.(Racial Profiling) which is wrong because no matter your race or color we should all be treated the same and they are using their powers to victimize people that didn't do anything instead of catching the real people that did the crimes. They should have at least looked into other people other more rather than singling in on Adnan after hearing Jay’s so called confession . When Adnan was in court what was his attorney