Litigation, ADR or Criminal Prosecution
Dana Hoyle
University of the People
Adele’s case is a very pitiful one, there are many who will sympathize with her. Although it was not established, it seems as if she is a single parent and she had life a bit difficult. It give the impression as if she was stealing not because she wanted to but because she thought it would have happened only once and she had a desperate need. However she found herself in the same situation and decided to took the same path. Usually when a person commits and crime and never get caught they usually assumed that they will never be found out. She seems like she was just trying to provide for her daughter However, what must be established here is that Adele took what does not belong to her, she stole money from her work place on several occasions hence, she committed fraud and in the eyes of the law it is considered to be a crime. Also her organization was hurt in this process. …show more content…
Crimes committed against your workplace are considered public injury and it is punishable by the government (Lau & Johnson, 2011). The normal procedure for cases of this nature is as follows: The organization in this case is the victim and they will be the witnesses, the government the persecution and Adele the defendant would be charged with embezzlement. The government will gather all its evidence against Adele’s and then charge her with an indictment. Adele will be considered innocent until she can be proven guilty. The government is tasked with the burden prove Adele’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt. If they cannot prove their case Adelle will be acquitted and she can never be charged for the same crime again, that would be double jeopardy and it is never allowed. The government. Criminal cases carries penalties and if charged Adele might be looking at some jail time (Lau & Johnson,
Dana Hoyle
University of the People
Adele’s case is a very pitiful one, there are many who will sympathize with her. Although it was not established, it seems as if she is a single parent and she had life a bit difficult. It give the impression as if she was stealing not because she wanted to but because she thought it would have happened only once and she had a desperate need. However she found herself in the same situation and decided to took the same path. Usually when a person commits and crime and never get caught they usually assumed that they will never be found out. She seems like she was just trying to provide for her daughter However, what must be established here is that Adele took what does not belong to her, she stole money from her work place on several occasions hence, she committed fraud and in the eyes of the law it is considered to be a crime. Also her organization was hurt in this process. …show more content…
Crimes committed against your workplace are considered public injury and it is punishable by the government (Lau & Johnson, 2011). The normal procedure for cases of this nature is as follows: The organization in this case is the victim and they will be the witnesses, the government the persecution and Adele the defendant would be charged with embezzlement. The government will gather all its evidence against Adele’s and then charge her with an indictment. Adele will be considered innocent until she can be proven guilty. The government is tasked with the burden prove Adele’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt. If they cannot prove their case Adelle will be acquitted and she can never be charged for the same crime again, that would be double jeopardy and it is never allowed. The government. Criminal cases carries penalties and if charged Adele might be looking at some jail time (Lau & Johnson,